Reply #67

or searching for a cure for cancer or something? why not put it to better use?


please. there is no child starving solely because a dog got a plate of human food as a last meal. it doesn't work that way. we have more than enough food to feed the world, the problem is distribution, so conserving one plate somewhere isn't going to change anything.

there are SO many WAY bigger factors to complain about if you're concerned about starving children.

would you really even think of telling those people that they were causing some child to starve?

and by the way, dog food is still food. so we're not talking about a survival difference, we're talking primarily about a culinary palate difference.

should they have just starved the dog? i mean heck, the dog's just gonna die later anyway, right?

sheesh!