Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Atman

(31,464 posts)
6. Not all gun owners are "nutters."
Tue Jan 22, 2013, 09:24 AM
Jan 2013

But your argument tends to jibe with many of them. You seem to think gun control advocates are seeking an all-or-nothing approach. Nothing could be further from the truth.

Seat belts laws were vehemently opposed as a violation of rights, but are widely accepted now. Do seat belts stop ALL automobile deaths? Of course not. But they've dramatically reduced their number. Same can be said for your "right" to smoke. No one says you can't smoke. But regulations about where you can smoke have dramatically reduced deaths. The list of similar comparisons is quite long.

For the bazillionth time, there is no movement to take your guns away. It isn't going to happen. What people are calling for is some common sense regulation to help reduce the likelihood of another mass shooting. No one expects to eliminate gun deaths. But there is absolutely no reason we can't take steps to make Americans safer.

No one is coming to take your guns!

The nutters still have a million answers for that. Atman Jan 2013 #1
Sounds like what Mitch McConnell tried to say in an e-mail to his supporters on mfcorey1 Jan 2013 #2
They have no regard for truth. Atman Jan 2013 #3
They certainly will. I don't count myself as a nutter, but simply by being an owner geckosfeet Jan 2013 #4
Not all gun owners are "nutters." Atman Jan 2013 #6
All my life I've sulphurdunn Jan 2013 #7
I don't think that. But I have seen "serious du'ers" proposing a repeal of the second amendment. geckosfeet Jan 2013 #8
Lots of people speak in hyperbole, but if you actually read the Constitution and Javaman Jan 2013 #11
Thank you! Atman Jan 2013 #15
I am not proposing unconstitutional regulation. geckosfeet Jan 2013 #27
To quote you... Javaman Jan 2013 #41
I did not make the proposal. geckosfeet Jan 2013 #43
Point to one of these serious DU'ers that are members of any nadinbrzezinski Jan 2013 #54
I don't know any personally. geckosfeet Jan 2013 #57
And...you know the steps to amend the Constitution nadinbrzezinski Jan 2013 #61
Yes. Just sayin - if people can hysterically rant about removing it geckosfeet Jan 2013 #62
And I will take your rants as seriously nadinbrzezinski Jan 2013 #63
We have reached a point of agreement then. geckosfeet Jan 2013 #65
Gun Owner is to Gun Nutter as... LanternWaste Jan 2013 #55
That's exactly how it's done. geckosfeet Jan 2013 #59
Here's a suggestion for all the good guy gun owners. Why dont you "sort through the chaff rhett o rick Jan 2013 #56
Well, since you asked. geckosfeet Jan 2013 #58
Forgive my over reaction. I appreciate your list and case presented. rhett o rick Jan 2013 #60
Not bad, s/he was doing well - sort of lost it at the end. jmg257 Jan 2013 #5
I'm curious sulphurdunn Jan 2013 #9
It won't happen...but they may try to get rid of as many of the targeted ones as they can. jmg257 Jan 2013 #14
I'm thinking he was talking about the Bushmaster look-a-likes. RC Jan 2013 #10
I understand what they were TRYing to say, but in a letter jmg257 Jan 2013 #13
So if it doesn't look like a military rifle a semi-automatic rifle is ok? hack89 Jan 2013 #17
You are deliberately not getting it RC Jan 2013 #35
And you are not getting it hack89 Jan 2013 #36
So what? That is not my point. I don't care how fast whatever can project projectiles. RC Jan 2013 #39
Yet handguns are the weapon of choice for most mass killers hack89 Jan 2013 #42
All you did was move the goal posts. RC Jan 2013 #44
We should start with a solution that would actually save lives. hack89 Jan 2013 #45
What is your solution that would actually save lives? RC Jan 2013 #46
Simple hack89 Jan 2013 #47
#2 has been tried. RC Jan 2013 #48
So we we can't crack down on violent felons? hack89 Jan 2013 #50
I hear you regjoe Jan 2013 #12
Yeah...where were the gun owners during the Bush administration? Thanks for nothing! Atman Jan 2013 #16
Where were the gun owners? regjoe Jan 2013 #18
That is one of the looniest "defenses" I've ever read! Atman Jan 2013 #19
Actually regjoe Jan 2013 #20
What 2nd Amendment rights are being taken away? JaneyVee Jan 2013 #22
Do you consider 'regulated' to be the same as "taken away?" regjoe Jan 2013 #23
You're the one who said "taken away". JaneyVee Jan 2013 #25
So, the 2nd Amendment "took away" weapons from militias? Atman Jan 2013 #26
Where does the "regulating" stop? regjoe Jan 2013 #30
You didn't understand my post, did you? Atman Jan 2013 #29
LOL! Have a nice day? But of course regjoe Jan 2013 #31
And 'People don't want to be a victim of a mass shooting, so the acts jmg257 Jan 2013 #21
So you have no problem with regjoe Jan 2013 #24
I have problems with laws that infringe on basic rights. Luckily most jmg257 Jan 2013 #28
At least you are honest regjoe Jan 2013 #32
??? Maybe you misread what I wrote? jmg257 Jan 2013 #33
No, I understood regjoe Jan 2013 #34
Ahh - got ya. The 2nd does indeed secure a right. jmg257 Jan 2013 #37
Get the Supreme Court regjoe Jan 2013 #38
The point already has some merit because so many lawmakers agree with it. jmg257 Jan 2013 #49
I've watched friends pretty much lose their minds over this Marrah_G Jan 2013 #40
Me too abelenkpe Jan 2013 #51
Its begun to really chill me to the bone Marrah_G Jan 2013 #53
Looks like the Usual Suspects bongbong Jan 2013 #52
They're not afraid of the second amendment being overturned- haele Jan 2013 #64
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Excellent letter to the e...»Reply #6