HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Krugman: Obama and Redist... » Reply #6
In the discussion thread: Krugman: Obama and Redistribution [View all]

Response to hfojvt (Reply #5)

Sun Jan 20, 2013, 03:40 PM

6. Dumb point.

"Meanwhile ATRA CUTS taxes relative to the EXPIRATION of the motherfucking goddam Bush tax cuts"

The fact is that it raises taxes on the top one percent even more than expiring Bush tax cuts. Sure some of those up to $400,000 benefit, but it's a permanent shift of taxing the top to benefit the bottom.

<...>

Perhaps the best prism through which to see the Democrats’ gains is inequality. In the 2008 campaign, Mr. Obama said that his top priority as president would be to “create bottom-up economic growth” and reduce inequality...In the 2009 stimulus, he insisted on making tax credits “fully refundable,” so that even people who did not make enough to pay much federal tax would benefit. The 2010 health care law overhaul was probably the biggest attack on inequality since it began rising in the 1970s, increasing taxes on businesses and the rich to pay for health insurance largely for the middle class.

As part of this week’s deal, Mr. Obama did make several major compromises. He accepted much less in overall tax revenue than the government would have received absent any deal. He allowed a payroll-tax cut, which applied to most households, to expire. And he yielded both on aspects of the estate tax and on the level at which the top marginal income-tax rate would start, moving it to $450,000 for couples, from $250,000.

Still, using inequality as a yardstick, he won much of what he had wanted. By holding firm to a top rate of 39.6 percent — up from 35 percent — he locked in a substantial tax increase for the very richest, who have received the biggest pretax raises in recent years.

On average, the top 0.1 percent of earners — whose incomes start at $2.7 million and go much higher — will pay $444,000 more in taxes in 2013 than they otherwise would have, according to the Tax Policy Center. The increases stem from both the fiscal deal and the new taxes in the health care law...the deal preserves the “compassionate conservative” part of President George W. Bush’s tax agenda — reducing federal income taxes on the working poor, sometimes to zero — while limiting the parts that most helped the affluent.

- more -

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/03/us/politics/for-obama-fiscal-deal-is-a-victory-that-also-holds-risks.html

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 20 replies Author Time Post
ProSense Jan 2013 OP
ProSense Jan 2013 #1
ProSense Jan 2013 #2
ProSense Jan 2013 #3
NashvilleLefty Jan 2013 #4
hfojvt Jan 2013 #5
LineLineNew Reply Dumb point.
ProSense Jan 2013 #6
hfojvt Jan 2013 #7
ProSense Jan 2013 #8
hfojvt Jan 2013 #9
ProSense Jan 2013 #10
hfojvt Jan 2013 #11
ProSense Jan 2013 #12
hfojvt Jan 2013 #13
ProSense Jan 2013 #14
Egalitarian Thug Jan 2013 #15
ProSense Jan 2013 #16
Egalitarian Thug Jan 2013 #17
ProSense Jan 2013 #18
hfojvt Jan 2013 #19
Egalitarian Thug Jan 2013 #20
Please login to view edit histories.