Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Oh, God, now they're coming for our avocados. Denninmi Jan 2013 #1
More to the point ... frazzled Jan 2013 #3
Not a bayonet...a bayonet mount. dkf Jan 2013 #8
There's no function for a bayonet mount unless ... frazzled Jan 2013 #11
The matter is not limited to your understanding of it cthulu2016 Jan 2013 #22
Sure about that? Fla_Democrat Jan 2013 #38
I can't think of a single non-military use for a bayonet Leaning Left Jan 2013 #18
Well, whoopee for you frazzled Jan 2013 #20
Since most pro-gun control arguments center on the volume of fire Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2013 #25
Have your "spear": just don't put it on the end of a gun frazzled Jan 2013 #28
collectors phillipstd Jan 2013 #32
You don't have a right to disturb the peace Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2013 #42
You really didn't get the OP even a little bit cthulu2016 Jan 2013 #43
Obviously you have never seen a feral pig. ... spin Jan 2013 #54
I use one in the garden rl6214 Jan 2013 #50
ROFL alcibiades_mystery Jan 2013 #5
the consitution also doesn't call for a d_r Jan 2013 #2
In the Heller ruling Scalia specifically mentioned the M16 as flamin lib Jan 2013 #4
A little more complicated hack89 Jan 2013 #13
None of that makes any difference. It's what the five conservative judges flamin lib Jan 2013 #14
There are a lot of rights not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution hack89 Jan 2013 #16
Government absolutely has a right to restrict what types of weapons are available Hugabear Jan 2013 #6
Government has the power, not the right. krispos42 Jan 2013 #9
Well, the Daisey is a smooth bore gun, so it has more in common with the flamin lib Jan 2013 #15
The OP doesn't "go with an interpretation" cthulu2016 Jan 2013 #33
actually that's true - the wording say 'arms' NOT 'all and every type of arms' samsingh Jan 2013 #53
Well, I'm glad you're not a SC Justice. Nye Bevan Jan 2013 #7
Just "feel good" politics! Leaning Left Jan 2013 #35
You wouldn't feel that way if I was cthulu2016 Jan 2013 #37
It allows them to control guns like the 'pre-ban' M1A & late WW2/ M1 Carbines. jmg257 Jan 2013 #10
The 'state' can "...restrict..." Tx4obama Jan 2013 #12
I thought we learned Leaning Left Jan 2013 #17
See post 87. eom RomneyLies Jan 2013 #26
Cool story, bro (nt) Recursion Jan 2013 #31
Enjoy your stay here. Lex Jan 2013 #41
On a scale from 1-100 Leaning Left Jan 2013 #19
And everyone can throw like John Elway. aandegoons Jan 2013 #21
OLD RIFLES! Leaning Left Jan 2013 #23
What about them? Very nice, but neither fit the AW description. jmg257 Jan 2013 #40
Let's just regulate the SALE and PURCHASE. JoePhilly Jan 2013 #24
How would you like that approach if it was applied to the First Amendment onenote Jan 2013 #34
I have to PAY for my internet connection. And its regulated. JoePhilly Jan 2013 #39
Just because regulation of commerce is permitted, onenote Jan 2013 #46
Ever been to an ABC store? JoePhilly Jan 2013 #47
I think you are missing the point onenote Jan 2013 #48
old rifle Leaning Left Jan 2013 #27
Gun porn thread bongbong Jan 2013 #29
Of course, since it's so easily avoided (just remove the bayonet lug) it's hard to argue standing Recursion Jan 2013 #30
+ 100,000,000 Leaning Left Jan 2013 #36
I noticed Leaning Left Jan 2013 #44
1 word..."decaf". nt jmg257 Jan 2013 #52
Post removed Post removed Jan 2013 #45
Don't really give a damn if it's unconstitutional if it saves lives... nt Comrade_McKenzie Jan 2013 #49
Summarizing Heller, elleng Jan 2013 #51
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I don't see how (one part...»Reply #23