Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

dkf

(37,305 posts)
4. Seems obvious to me. Especially when the new laws don't accomplish much.
Tue Jan 15, 2013, 12:40 PM
Jan 2013

Once you start limiting one feature and another shooting occurs, you need to limit the next feature, and the next occurs, then the next and the next. Because in the end even the most pathetic pea shooter isn't "safe".

If you want safety and could care less about rights, it's the logical end.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»X, Y, and Z: Anti-gun-con...»Reply #4