Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: You either accept limits on the 2nd Amendment, or you do not accept any limits at all. [View all]bongbong
(5,436 posts)29. The current wingut SCOTUS always ignores precedent
They ignored decades of decisions and legal history treating the 2nd Amendment as a group right when they mis-decided Heller.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
You either accept limits on the 2nd Amendment, or you do not accept any limits at all. [View all]
Hugabear
Jan 2013
OP
Reasonable limits, same as the first amendment. Supreme court ruled handgun bans were unreasonable.
Kurska
Jan 2013
#2
Tom Tomorrow coined the term to describe the gun nuts. It has now been hijacked by people not ...
11 Bravo
Jan 2013
#35
It's a gun owner who is super sensitive to percieved slights against their arsenals.
maxsolomon
Jan 2013
#40
I didn't give a shit about it. Because it's re-arranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.
maxsolomon
Jan 2013
#38
It could be possible, it could also be unconstitutional the courts would no doubt rule on it.
Kurska
Jan 2013
#11
Except the NRA screams bloody murder at even the most mild of gun control suggestions
Hugabear
Jan 2013
#10
Of course they do; that's their job. That said, they are open to expanding NICS
Recursion
Jan 2013
#13
I've often wondered why Second Amendment absolutists don't demand their right* to carry on airplanes
KamaAina
Jan 2013
#7
Owners of private property are free to make their own rules, as long as it doesn't discriminate.
NutmegYankee
Jan 2013
#12