General Discussion

krispos42

(49,445 posts)

9. Because there are very few accidental gun deaths per year

Sat Jan 12, 2013, 01:05 PM

Jan 2013

It's false equivalency. Guns do not go off by themselves. They are not so badly made that normal use makes them explode and injure bystanders.

They are used as tools to commit crime.

Cars are used to enable criminals to escape. Therefore, people can't own cars.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

45 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

And Nobody Cried: "They Are Trying To Take Away My Car" [View all] kpete Jan 2013 OP

Why indeed? yardwork Jan 2013 #1

That's because no one was talking about banning cars with racing wheels. aikoaiko Jan 2013 #2

You can paint flames on the side of your gun liberal N proud Jan 2013 #3

YEP. Rex Jan 2013 #5

how about a bayonet lug without a bayonet? aikoaiko Jan 2013 #32

This. Chorophyll Jan 2013 #18

I love how someone claims assault rifles are just "decorations".... Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2013 #13

Whether it's guns or cars or anything else, giving people 'wood' is not any form of problem petronius Jan 2013 #27

As far as "function" goes... Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2013 #35

Rush Limbaugh doesn't tell them what will happen next siligut Jan 2013 #40

The funny thing is these guys are the zombies they're waiting for. Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2013 #43

Only the most radical minority believe that - but, yes, that's what it's about. freshwest Jan 2013 #44

They LIKE the idea of the government targeting Liberals when they're in charge.... Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2013 #45

If by racing wheels you mean slick wheels, those are illegal on the street. sakabatou Jan 2013 #20

Wheels are 'rims'. Slicks are tires. aikoaiko Jan 2013 #31

There were a number of car magazines in the 60's and 70's that whined ThoughtCriminal Jan 2013 #4

High capacity car magazines? Robb Jan 2013 #6

Sort of like that ThoughtCriminal Jan 2013 #8

Nobody tried to take away cars, or ban cars with "sports car features" Recursion Jan 2013 #7

Depends on the "Feature" ThoughtCriminal Jan 2013 #11

Spoilers cartach Jan 2013 #24

That's my point (nt) Recursion Jan 2013 #26

Because there are very few accidental gun deaths per year krispos42 Jan 2013 #9

Actually ThoughtCriminal Jan 2013 #10

If people spent as much time with a gun in their hands as they do driving their vehicles... Buzz Clik Jan 2013 #22

Carrying a gun is "using" it. Straw Man Jan 2013 #30

Just like ThoughtCriminal Jan 2013 #34

One way to look at it. Straw Man Jan 2013 #37

Hopefully they would ThoughtCriminal Jan 2013 #41

Perhaps because nobody was trying to take their car. cthulu2016 Jan 2013 #12

who is taking your gun? frylock Jan 2013 #15

I don't have a gun, so your question is very foolish cthulu2016 Jan 2013 #17

as was your post i responded to.. frylock Jan 2013 #19

Disingenuous much? Straw Man Jan 2013 #29

buy your spare mags prior to any new legislation.. frylock Jan 2013 #33

Not really. Straw Man Jan 2013 #36

I do recall that many people Silver Swan Jan 2013 #14

Rep. Helen Chenoweth ThoughtCriminal Jan 2013 #25

Why - Because Of That Damned 2nd Amendment And The SCOTUS Unwilling To Take On The NRA cantbeserious Jan 2013 #16

A lot of proposals out there DO suggest elimination of some forms of gun ownership. Buzz Clik Jan 2013 #21

Because gun nuts are irrational. I post on another LibDemAlways Jan 2013 #23

Yet we have cars that can go in excess of 80mph sarisataka Jan 2013 #28

And gun nuts think my Nissan Altima is deadlier than an AR-15. Initech Jan 2013 #38

You can still buy a 650 horsepower GT500 that can go over 200mph Taitertots Jan 2013 #39

That's because no one WAS trying to ban cars. And there were plenty of complaints about seat belts. Honeycombe8 Jan 2013 #42