HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Let's show true fidelity ... » Reply #4
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Response to cantbeserious (Reply #1)

Sat Jan 12, 2013, 09:35 AM

4. No, I call for everyone between 18-46. We simply delete the male stuff.

Of course ownership and the right to bare is an individual right so it is not conditioned on participation in the militia. You would have the right after your service period or if you were unable to reasonably serve due to a handicap or something too.

I think that there should be no standing Army (boots on the ground, armor, etc). Due to skill level requirements and modern realities we would maintain a standing Navy and Air Force. The Army would be replaced mostly with the militia. Folks would serve and train for a year in a stretch and then a few days a year to maintain proficiency unless called up for a national emergency. Special forces and a small contingent of Marines (say a division) would continue to exist, along with brass. The militia could only serve in the US.

I'd close 90% or so of all bases worldwide but would add several carrier groups to maintain our ability to project power globally.

Conscientious objectors would be fine, they would serve in support roles but be excused from combat related situations and training.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 7 replies Author Time Post
rgbecker Jan 2013 OP
cantbeserious Jan 2013 #1
LineLineNew Reply No, I call for everyone between 18-46. We simply delete the male stuff.
TheKentuckian Jan 2013 #4
cantbeserious Jan 2013 #7
Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2013 #2
99Forever Jan 2013 #3
HereSince1628 Jan 2013 #5
99Forever Jan 2013 #6
Please login to view edit histories.