Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
But first, Turbineguy Jan 2013 #1
yup, i guess the figure the custodian is a single most expendable employee at a school. unblock Jan 2013 #3
I hope the custodians negotiated a raise for their additional Fresh_Start Jan 2013 #2
Guard services don't pay particularly well. FarCenter Jan 2013 #4
That would be the very first question I would ask if I were one Tempest Jan 2013 #5
not only targets... but also they are taking on liability Fresh_Start Jan 2013 #8
Or if one of their stray bullets hits a student or teacher Tempest Jan 2013 #34
Sometimes the school district will pay Fresh_Start Jan 2013 #36
How long before some student will get shot. tblue Jan 2013 #6
Bad management practice. Stupid politics. Principals in all states are THE primary point person for ancianita Jan 2013 #7
Hard to say about qualifications? Some custodians may be veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan. FarCenter Jan 2013 #9
That's too random and undependable as a practice in securing schools. Having "some" isn't a ancianita Jan 2013 #10
A posted, uniformed, armed guard can be useful, but only if you're out of the mass shooting mindset Recursion Jan 2013 #11
So because it can help in some cases Aerows Jan 2013 #13
Well, that's the opposite of what I'm suggesting Recursion Jan 2013 #16
They aren't rare though Aerows Jan 2013 #20
I don't know who decided this, but 4 fatalities in one incident is the "official" definition Recursion Jan 2013 #21
607 people Aerows Jan 2013 #23
I keep banging my head into this wall, but... Recursion Jan 2013 #31
I'm a much bigger fan Aerows Jan 2013 #35
Form and function Recursion Jan 2013 #44
Apparently you're not up on drive by shootings Tempest Jan 2013 #37
Not rifles, though Recursion Jan 2013 #41
Semi automatic machine guns that are legal to purchase. Tempest Jan 2013 #42
Something is either semi-automatic or a machine gun Recursion Jan 2013 #45
An Uzi is a semi-automatic machine gun. So it's not either/or. n/t Tempest Jan 2013 #49
No, an Uzi is not semi-automatic Recursion Jan 2013 #50
How about from the manufacturer? Would that be good enough? Tempest Jan 2013 #53
That's an "Uzi pistol", not an "Uzi submachinegun" Recursion Jan 2013 #54
You're seriously going to debate between a semi-automatic machine gun Tempest Jan 2013 #60
Yes. One is automatic and one is semi-automatic. Recursion Jan 2013 #61
Endless obsession about gun details bongbong Jan 2013 #65
And his clock has just run out. Tempest Jan 2013 #66
No ... Straw Man Jan 2013 #72
NOT true. Every security person knows that entry points are exactly the control points for school ancianita Jan 2013 #17
Why do you agree with me but then say "NOT true"? Recursion Jan 2013 #19
Oh. I guess because your example of how security doesn't work seemed to argue against your ancianita Jan 2013 #25
Doesn't work against lone gunman mass shooter types Recursion Jan 2013 #32
Lone gunmen Aerows Jan 2013 #40
I'm ready to address this if you can link some critical mass of "exceptions" that you imply here. ancianita Jan 2013 #43
I'm not against guards, just against them having guns Recursion Jan 2013 #46
Having unarmed entry guards in a country of 300 million guns makes absolutely no sense. ancianita Jan 2013 #48
Good security practices? marions ghost Jan 2013 #63
How come no one is asking why we need guns in schools?? Angry Dragon Jan 2013 #12
You can't fix the problem 100% Aerows Jan 2013 #18
So you are advocating confiscation to fix the problem? dkf Jan 2013 #26
Is that what was said? Even close? Buzz Clik Jan 2013 #27
In other words, just another post from dkf. n/t Tempest Jan 2013 #38
Yes, that's exactly what EVERYONE in this thread Aerows Jan 2013 #51
+1 Buzz Clik Jan 2013 #58
Show me where I said anything close to what you suggest ........ Angry Dragon Jan 2013 #67
I predict you won't get a meaningful reply from that one. 2ndAmForComputers Jan 2013 #73
Wasn't there an armed guard at the latest school shooting? SheilaT Jan 2013 #14
Principals know that for every entry and exit point you need an armed guard, and their communities ancianita Jan 2013 #30
Are you really advocating this? marions ghost Jan 2013 #64
It's not advocacy as much as it is pragmatics. ancianita Jan 2013 #71
Other countries have managed to take the guns away. SheilaT Jan 2013 #68
I would totally agree with this. The problem is the registering. I've suggested that every state ancianita Jan 2013 #69
Guard wasn't there. He was snowed in and didn't make it. n/t Tempest Jan 2013 #39
And of course, that will never happen again SheilaT Jan 2013 #74
... Robb Jan 2013 #15
Oh, Snap! Brother Buzz Jan 2013 #22
I have never been in a school where the janitor was anything less than a charity hire. Buzz Clik Jan 2013 #28
They are going to find his retirement grease. nt msanthrope Jan 2013 #24
In a local school district mainstreetonce Jan 2013 #29
I know that if the custodians would have had guns when I went to school, I would have been shot liberal N proud Jan 2013 #33
who ensures that the custodians can be trusted and won't cause more damage samsingh Jan 2013 #47
unanimously... hmmph (nt) OneTenthofOnePercent Jan 2013 #52
Armed custodians if we can't get cops we'll used the guys with mops Historic NY Jan 2013 #55
Weren't these the guys Politicalboi Jan 2013 #56
Tell me this is an Onion article? Rex Jan 2013 #57
And then it will lay them off due to the cost ... JoePhilly Jan 2013 #59
This is like a script for a bad Splatter movie. leveymg Jan 2013 #62
This is a bad idea. It just makes the custodians the first target of any shooter. JVS Jan 2013 #70
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»An Ohio School District I...»Reply #37