General Discussion

OneTenthofOnePercent

(6,268 posts)

42. Breaks what rules?

Tue Jan 8, 2013, 07:28 AM

Jan 2013

I mean to show National Firearms act is obsolete by new invention, ie: you can buy a machine gun
Not a good machine gun but one that breaks the rules and has great potential for harm in the exact right situation.

???

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

64 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This Simple, Legal Add-On Lets an AR-15 Rifle Fire 900 Rounds Per Minute [View all] MightyMopar Jan 2013 OP

Previously debunked...and you participated in that thread ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2013 #1

It's not debunked because you say it is, it fires as fast as machine gun! MightyMopar Jan 2013 #2

Some machine guns fire quickly, some fire slowly. ManiacJoe Jan 2013 #14

A full automatic M-16s runs 600 rpm (instantaneous rate) ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2013 #31

Slate rarely gets technical things correct, and this story is no different ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2013 #28

Well, What Do You Expect Of The Progressive Media, Mr. "Progressive"? Paladin Jan 2013 #33

I expect accuracy from the media on technical matters. I am oft disappointed, regardless of ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2013 #40

OK. From Now On, It's MR. Paladin, to you..... (nt) Paladin Jan 2013 #41

Is it possible to build a jetpack using downward firing machine guns? Xipe Totec Jan 2013 #3

900 rounds per minute equals 15 rounds per second. That better? Scuba Jan 2013 #9

Not better, not worse. The same. Xipe Totec Jan 2013 #10

So if the headline read "This Simple, Legal Add-On Lets an AR-15 Rifle Fire 15 Rounds er Second" .. Scuba Jan 2013 #11

The same; there is a limit to how much weight a mass murderer can carry arround. Xipe Totec Jan 2013 #13

And the less ammo he has, the fewer people he can kill. I like my logic lesson better than yours. Scuba Jan 2013 #15

He can carry the same ammo, just shoot slower and aim better. Xipe Totec Jan 2013 #17

So he walks into a crowded gym during a pep assembly gollygee Jan 2013 #18

The logic is quite simple Xipe Totec Jan 2013 #21

An idiot with a machine gun gollygee Jan 2013 #22

You can do far more damage with ricin Xipe Totec Jan 2013 #24

And ricin is just as easily procurable as ammo. What a silly comparison. EOTE Jan 2013 #51

Ricin is not procurable; it is synthesizable Xipe Totec Jan 2013 #56

Any idiot can get a shit load of ammo. EOTE Jan 2013 #57

See post #17 nt Xipe Totec Jan 2013 #63

Once again, a very foolish argument. EOTE Jan 2013 #64

More "Democraticgunsaround." n/t rzemanfl Jan 2013 #4

It can be done with a simple rubberband. flamin lib Jan 2013 #5

At about a half a buck per round, that is a very expensive minute. OffWithTheirHeads Jan 2013 #6

If you are going to be dead afterwards, the splurge probably doesnt matter. nt stevenleser Jan 2013 #43

That's the fundamental problem; there's little you can do to stop a kamikaze Xipe Totec Jan 2013 #44

I disagree. Guns make them too easy is the issue. Without guns, someone trying to cause stevenleser Jan 2013 #46

If you read my post you'll see we are in total agreement. nt Xipe Totec Jan 2013 #47

Is bump-firing used in many murders? cthulu2016 Jan 2013 #7

If it's legal to pack a 900-rounds-per-minute assault weapon on one's hip, great comfort can be indepat Jan 2013 #8

I gotta get one.... just my style! Bill USA Jan 2013 #12

"From my cold, dead hands!!!" LAGC Jan 2013 #30

Has anyone fired 900 rounds in a minute using this technique? cthulu2016 Jan 2013 #16

The rate of fire cannot be maintained for the full minute ManiacJoe Jan 2013 #20

No, but you can dump a 100 round mag in about seven seconds. RomneyLies Jan 2013 #32

If you're looking down the wrong end of one it doesn't matter. nt rrneck Jan 2013 #19

I don't know if the modification would work..... Red Mountain Jan 2013 #23

It's extremely effective. RomneyLies Jan 2013 #34

Why does the USMC preach semi-only then? sir pball Jan 2013 #58

You get far more contro with a slide stock and semi-automatic RomneyLies Jan 2013 #59

Huh sir pball Jan 2013 #60

I'd never fire off 20 rounds in one go RomneyLies Jan 2013 #61

I did, once sir pball Jan 2013 #62

Those 100 round mags are not reliable. More likely to jam prior to any melt down ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2013 #36

So what did the ATF say about the slide fire? ileus Jan 2013 #25

100% legal as the weapon is still semi-automatic RomneyLies Jan 2013 #35

I'd think with most cheap AR's this would just make a jam-o-matic. ileus Jan 2013 #39

And a great tool for Darwin and Murphy SQUEE Jan 2013 #48

A friend of mines DPMS went Kaboom this year. ileus Jan 2013 #52

Then write your legislators and the ATF about it NickB79 Jan 2013 #26

The ATF Has Been Without A Director For The Last Six Years. Paladin Jan 2013 #37

The difference in the stocks is the one banned used a spring mechanism for the return action. RomneyLies Jan 2013 #38

There's also the BMF Activator NickB79 Jan 2013 #27

I mean to show National Firearms act is obsolete by new invention, ie: you can buy a machine gun MightyMopar Jan 2013 #29

Breaks what rules? OneTenthofOnePercent Jan 2013 #42

It's legal because it's a waste of money. Heimer Jan 2013 #45

Subjective and not relevant...also can be used for suppression fire against police... uponit7771 Jan 2013 #54

I for one disagree, I don't trust the hired guns of the PTB SQUEE Jan 2013 #55

When you absolutely, positively got to kill every motherfucker in the room, accept no substitutes. krawhitham Jan 2013 #49

Actually this would be horrible at doing that Recursion Jan 2013 #53

But, but, but...criminals don't obey laws, so we can't ban those modifications! Tommy_Carcetti Jan 2013 #50