Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
15. your link doesn't say what you're claiming.
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 01:14 AM
Jan 2013

The Act preserves the 25%, 28%, 33% and 35% brackets, which were set to rise at the beginning of 2013, and adds a new 39.6% bracket applicable to taxable income exceeding (i) $450,000 for married individuals filing jointly or (ii) $400,000 for individual filers.

The income thresholds for each bracket will now be adjusted for inflation.

Note that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act imposes additional Medicare taxes, also effective on January 1, 2013, of (i) 3.8% upon certain investment income and (ii) 0.9% on certain employee wages and self-employment income, each of which were previously subject to a 2.9% tax, including the employer portion of the Medicare tax on employee wages.

Generally, the additional Medicare tax on investment income applies to the extent that modified adjusted gross income exceeds $250,000 for married individuals filing jointly and $200,000 for individual filers, and the additional Medicare tax on wages and selfemployment income applies above a threshold of compensation income of $250,000 for joint filers and $200,000 for individual filers.

http://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/the-american-taxpayer-relief-act-of-2012-14974/


Here's what you made of it:

Short-term 43.4 percent. Long-term 23.8 percent.

But it doesn't say that. It says a 3.8% tax on "certain investment income" over the cap.

It's a surcharge on total qualified investment income over the cap, not a tax on short-term or long-term cap gains.

Top rates on short & long-term cap gains = 39.6% & 20%. As stated in your link.

Is naked capitalism your new wsws?...nt SidDithers Jan 2013 #1
No, what you posted is propaganda. ProSense Jan 2013 #2
First, short-term capital gains were taxed at regular income tax rates before the deal, & still HiPointDem Jan 2013 #4
Oh, ProSense Jan 2013 #8
medicare tax is a surcharge on *most* capital income over a cap, not just on S-T cap gains. HiPointDem Jan 2013 #10
Yes, it is. ProSense Jan 2013 #11
You'd better read what i wrote again, & the source material i posted, because you're flat wrong. HiPointDem Jan 2013 #12
No, ProSense Jan 2013 #13
your link doesn't say what you're claiming. HiPointDem Jan 2013 #15
It says exactly that, but ProSense Jan 2013 #16
where does it say 'exactly that'? HiPointDem Jan 2013 #17
It says ProSense Jan 2013 #18
i take that as an admission that it doesn't say what you just claimed. HiPointDem Jan 2013 #19
yeah sure hfojvt Jan 2013 #21
Wow is this article wrong jeff47 Jan 2013 #3
not sure what you're claiming here, but: HiPointDem Jan 2013 #5
You really should read the article jeff47 Jan 2013 #6
you didn't hear me. no sense talking to you. HiPointDem Jan 2013 #14
Again, your blogger is wrong. jeff47 Jan 2013 #25
the 'blogger' (a tax lawyer) is not the only person saying so. HiPointDem Jan 2013 #27
You just contradicted your first blogger jeff47 Jan 2013 #28
the first source doesn't claim the rate reverts to an expired law. you're blowing smoke, goodbye. HiPointDem Jan 2013 #29
Go look up 4 posts. jeff47 Jan 2013 #31
and the new legislation doesn't mention qualified dividends & does remain tied to capital gains HiPointDem Jan 2013 #32
You're almost there. jeff47 Jan 2013 #33
the links say otherwise. you're blowing smoke. HiPointDem Jan 2013 #34
please provide me with a source that supports your claim that qualified dividends no longer HiPointDem Jan 2013 #35
I already did. Look up the thread for the Wikipedia link. jeff47 Jan 2013 #36
i've provided 5 links, all saying the same thing. i'm not going to search this thread for a HiPointDem Jan 2013 #38
You can't find post #3? jeff47 Jan 2013 #39
rec cthulu2016 Jan 2013 #7
It's nonsense. n/t ProSense Jan 2013 #9
while I agree with the title hfojvt Jan 2013 #20
In at least one important area the article UNDERSTATES the situation. Faryn Balyncd Jan 2013 #22
+1 HiPointDem Jan 2013 #30
Most progressive tax code since Reagan isn't saying much anyway gollygee Jan 2013 #23
ironic though; top rate was higher during most of reagan admin. HiPointDem Jan 2013 #26
For Obama, a Victory That Also Holds Risks ProSense Jan 2013 #24
There is nothing progressive about any tax code... kentuck Jan 2013 #37
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Fiscal cliff deal = most ...»Reply #15