Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Was Citizens United Correct? [View all]reACTIONary
(5,770 posts)22. The first amendment does not protect commercial speech...
...but it does protect political speech and the freedom of conscience. Is your suggestion that expressing a political, religious or philosophical opinion can be equivocated with promoting a fraudulent investment? How does that work - they seem fundamentally different to me.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
67 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of state
Fire Walk With Me
Jan 2013
#13
" in an oppressive, authoritarian police state, you don't." No totally, not yet.
Lady Freedom Returns
Jan 2013
#47
You are stuck in semantics and theories while the facts are in your face.
Fire Walk With Me
Jan 2013
#56
Corporations, or any paper entity, are not people. Money is not speech.
Egalitarian Thug
Jan 2013
#21
One last kick to your attention seeking flame bait. "It falls short of an abomination" is only your
Egalitarian Thug
Jan 2013
#28
You are right. "An abomination" might not be all that much of a big deal...
reACTIONary
Jan 2013
#32
OK, it seems you really want to talk, my apologies for assuming that you were just
Egalitarian Thug
Jan 2013
#37
Actually, the ACLU said yes to a very narrow issue and the court ruled very broadly against
Puregonzo1188
Jan 2013
#51