Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why Paul Krugman should be President Obama's pick for US treasury secretary [View all]ProSense
(116,464 posts)6. I get the sense
"Krugman will remain banished from the White House until he embraces triangulation, which he will not barring a brain trauma of some sort."
...that the most important thing in the world to you is to prove Obama is a sellout who should be despised.
Krugman is a practical person who rarily subccumbs to knee-jerk.
Battles of the Budget
By PAUL KRUGMAN
The centrist fantasy of a Grand Bargain on the budget never had a chance. Even if some kind of bargain had supposedly been reached, key players would soon have reneged on the deal probably the next time a Republican occupied the White House.
For the reality is that our two major political parties are engaged in a fierce struggle over the future shape of American society. Democrats want to preserve the legacy of the New Deal and the Great Society Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid and add to them what every other advanced country has: a more or less universal guarantee of essential health care. Republicans want to roll all of that back, making room for drastically lower taxes on the wealthy. Yes, its essentially a class war.
The fight over the fiscal cliff was just one battle in that war. It ended, arguably, in a tactical victory for Democrats. The question is whether it was a Pyrrhic victory that set the stage for a larger defeat.
Why do I say that it was a tactical victory? Mainly because of what didnt happen: There were no benefit cuts.
<...>
There were also some actual positives from a progressive point of view. Expanded unemployment benefits were given another year to run, a huge benefit to many families and a significant boost to our economic prospects (because this is money that will be spent, and hence help preserve jobs). Other benefits to lower-income families were given another five years although, unfortunately, the payroll tax break was allowed to expire, which will hurt both working families and job creation.
- more -
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/04/opinion/kurgman-battles-of-the-budget.html
By PAUL KRUGMAN
The centrist fantasy of a Grand Bargain on the budget never had a chance. Even if some kind of bargain had supposedly been reached, key players would soon have reneged on the deal probably the next time a Republican occupied the White House.
For the reality is that our two major political parties are engaged in a fierce struggle over the future shape of American society. Democrats want to preserve the legacy of the New Deal and the Great Society Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid and add to them what every other advanced country has: a more or less universal guarantee of essential health care. Republicans want to roll all of that back, making room for drastically lower taxes on the wealthy. Yes, its essentially a class war.
The fight over the fiscal cliff was just one battle in that war. It ended, arguably, in a tactical victory for Democrats. The question is whether it was a Pyrrhic victory that set the stage for a larger defeat.
Why do I say that it was a tactical victory? Mainly because of what didnt happen: There were no benefit cuts.
<...>
There were also some actual positives from a progressive point of view. Expanded unemployment benefits were given another year to run, a huge benefit to many families and a significant boost to our economic prospects (because this is money that will be spent, and hence help preserve jobs). Other benefits to lower-income families were given another five years although, unfortunately, the payroll tax break was allowed to expire, which will hurt both working families and job creation.
- more -
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/04/opinion/kurgman-battles-of-the-budget.html
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Why Paul Krugman should be President Obama's pick for US treasury secretary [View all]
ProSense
Jan 2013
OP
Robert Reich would be a "good pick" too & has experience from the Clinton administration.
xtraxritical
Jan 2013
#25
ProSense, did you notice this part of the story? Hagel is being trashed here on DU:
freshwest
Jan 2013
#26
For me it comes down to the fact that Krugman is a Kensian. He understands how we got out of
jwirr
Jan 2013
#41
I'm guessing that ProSense would rather have Krugman inside the tent pissing out
Fumesucker
Jan 2013
#42