HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Matt Taibbi's big con

Sun Jan 6, 2013, 10:45 AM

Matt Taibbi's big con [View all]

Matt Taibbi's big con

by citizen k

Previously published here.

Matt Taibbi is so good at whipping up indignation about the evil bankers that it's easy to overlook the crackpot and diversionary nature of the story he is telling. It would be useful if there was public pressure, for example, to provide a postal bank that would give people an alternative to commercial banks or if the government made low cost loans available to businesses or municipalities (instead of just to banks) so that Wall Street's casino investment mentality could not cripple the economy. Tax policy that rewarded long term investment and penalized gambling with other people's money would also be useful. But Taibbi and others have displaced discussions of such options with confused and misdirected anger. For example, once he has developed the narrative a bit in his latest, he offers up the following absurd line:

Republican senators David Vitter of Louisiana and James Inhofe of Oklahoma were so mad about the unilateral changes and lack of oversight that they sponsored a bill in January 2009 to cancel the remaining $350 billion of TARP.

David Vitter and James Inhofe, two of the worst, most despicable, most irresponsible Senators in the history of the United States were - get this -"mad about ... lack of oversight" in TARP. And because of this sudden rush of integrity and public spirit, not because they were unprincipled partisan hacks angry that Barack Obama was taking office a week later, they tried to shut off the money spigots after Paulson and G. W. Bush had already handed out $300 billion to Wall Street. That's what Taibbi wants you to believe. On second thought, "crackpot" is too polite.

The Vitter/Inhofe resolution was also sponsored by Bunning, Sessions, DeMint, Barrasso, Enzi and Brownback- an all star cast of terrible Senators. And Taibbi pivots from the righteous indignation of Diaper Dave Vitter to the fulminations of Neil Barofsky, the guy GW Bush appointed as TARP Inspector General and whose complaints Taibbi takes as unquestionable truth. Mr. Barofsky, it turns out, was also a big fan of GOP politicians.

For instance, like so many actors in the capital, Mr. Barofsky develops backdoor relationships with the offices of friendly Republican lawmakers like Senator Charles E. Grassley of Iowa and Representative Darrell Issa of California, leaking information back and forth to shape news coverage. Then he wonders why Treasury keeps him in the dark? (NYT)

Issa and Grassley - nearly at the same level of moral integrity and public service as Vitter. But here's something just as important that Taibbi does not say: the failure of that Vitter/Inhofe resolution is what allowed President Obama and Treasury Secretary Geithner to rescue the auto industry with TARP funds. In fact, the auto rescue, by far the biggest use of TARP funds by Obama's Administration is never mentioned in Taibbi's article. Never mentioned- like it didn't happen. Of course the Treasury under Tim Geithner did not just rescue the auto industry, it rescued the credit unions, provided billions of dollars of TARP loans to small banks, including labor union owned banks, and retrieved almost all the money Bush and Paulson had given to the big Wall Street banks. Taibbi makes strenuous efforts to dance around the last part - in fact he implies the opposite.

And lastly, he (Larry Summers) promised that the bailouts would be temporary – with a "plan for exit of government intervention" implemented "as quickly as possible."

The reassurances worked. Once again, TARP survived in Congress – and once again, the bailouts were greenlighted with the aid of Democrats who fell for the old "it'll help ordinary people" sales pitch. <..>

But in the end, almost nothing Summers promised actually materialized.

But in fact, with one exception everything Summers promised did materialize - especially the exit. Almost all of the money that Bush and Paulson gave to Wall Street came back to the public under Obama and Geithner. To avoid the problem this fact presents for his story, Taibbi uses a lot of invective:

It has been four long winters since the federal government, in the hulking, shaven-skulled, Alien Nation-esque form of then-Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson, committed $700 billion in taxpayer money to rescue Wall Street from its own chicanery and greed.

Actually, the government never committed more than $450billion, but what's an additional $250billion when it gets in the way of a good story? Or how's this on Larry Summers?

- more -

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/01/06/1176751/-Matt-Taibbi-s-big-con

I simply can't wrap my head around why anyone would credit Republicans for this.

The TARP program originally authorized expenditures of $700 billion. The Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act reduced the amount authorized to $475 billion...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troubled_Asset_Relief_Program.





Note:

Kos Media, LLC Site content may be used for any purpose without explicit permission unless otherwise specified



167 replies, 9301 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 167 replies Author Time Post
Reply Matt Taibbi's big con [View all]
ProSense Jan 2013 OP
RomneyLies Jan 2013 #1
Kahuna Jan 2013 #2
RomneyLies Jan 2013 #3
OKNancy Jan 2013 #5
RomneyLies Jan 2013 #7
Tom Rinaldo Jan 2013 #21
leveymg Jan 2013 #133
RomneyLies Jan 2013 #134
leveymg Jan 2013 #135
RomneyLies Jan 2013 #137
leveymg Jan 2013 #140
MannyGoldstein Jan 2013 #4
ProSense Jan 2013 #6
MannyGoldstein Jan 2013 #18
RomneyLies Jan 2013 #19
Skittles Jan 2013 #153
RomneyLies Jan 2013 #154
Skittles Jan 2013 #155
RomneyLies Jan 2013 #158
Skittles Jan 2013 #159
LineLineLineLineLineLineLineLineLineLineNew Reply .
RomneyLies Jan 2013 #160
ProSense Jan 2013 #20
amandabeech Jan 2013 #75
Tutonic Jan 2013 #8
RomneyLies Jan 2013 #9
ProSense Jan 2013 #11
No Compromise Jan 2013 #10
Octafish Jan 2013 #12
LineLineReply .
RomneyLies Jan 2013 #13
ProSense Jan 2013 #14
Octafish Jan 2013 #25
MannyGoldstein Jan 2013 #28
ProSense Jan 2013 #32
Octafish Jan 2013 #33
ProSense Jan 2013 #36
Octafish Jan 2013 #46
Rex Jan 2013 #60
ProSense Jan 2013 #63
Octafish Jan 2013 #73
Rex Jan 2013 #97
woo me with science Jan 2013 #151
ProSense Jan 2013 #30
Octafish Jan 2013 #39
ProSense Jan 2013 #48
Octafish Jan 2013 #53
ProSense Jan 2013 #54
Octafish Jan 2013 #61
RomneyLies Jan 2013 #62
Octafish Jan 2013 #69
RomneyLies Jan 2013 #70
grahamhgreen Jan 2013 #108
RomneyLies Jan 2013 #111
Octafish Jan 2013 #163
datasuspect Jan 2013 #106
RomneyLies Jan 2013 #117
woo me with science Jan 2013 #152
Sekhmets Daughter Jan 2013 #109
LIBertea Jan 2013 #15
ProSense Jan 2013 #16
RomneyLies Jan 2013 #17
grahamhgreen Jan 2013 #79
RomneyLies Jan 2013 #80
grahamhgreen Jan 2013 #84
RomneyLies Jan 2013 #88
janx Jan 2013 #121
RomneyLies Jan 2013 #122
janx Jan 2013 #125
RomneyLies Jan 2013 #127
Skittles Jan 2013 #161
MannyGoldstein Jan 2013 #29
leftstreet Jan 2013 #31
ProSense Jan 2013 #34
leftstreet Jan 2013 #38
ProSense Jan 2013 #52
grahamhgreen Jan 2013 #76
leftstreet Jan 2013 #82
Skittles Jan 2013 #156
MannyGoldstein Jan 2013 #22
ProSense Jan 2013 #23
MannyGoldstein Jan 2013 #24
ProSense Jan 2013 #26
MannyGoldstein Jan 2013 #27
RomneyLies Jan 2013 #58
Marr Jan 2013 #37
ProSense Jan 2013 #41
Marr Jan 2013 #43
ProSense Jan 2013 #50
RomneyLies Jan 2013 #59
Marr Jan 2013 #35
ProSense Jan 2013 #40
Marr Jan 2013 #44
ProSense Jan 2013 #51
HiPointDem Jan 2013 #128
Bonobo Jan 2013 #166
bigtree Jan 2013 #42
freshwest Jan 2013 #45
snot Jan 2013 #47
ProSense Jan 2013 #49
snot Jan 2013 #162
JEB Jan 2013 #55
patrice Jan 2013 #56
jtuck004 Jan 2013 #57
SidDithers Jan 2013 #64
Tarheel_Dem Jan 2013 #65
colsohlibgal Jan 2013 #66
RomneyLies Jan 2013 #67
MannyGoldstein Jan 2013 #71
RomneyLies Jan 2013 #72
MannyGoldstein Jan 2013 #131
RomneyLies Jan 2013 #132
grantcart Jan 2013 #68
Romulox Jan 2013 #77
patrice Jan 2013 #118
grahamhgreen Jan 2013 #74
datasuspect Jan 2013 #78
ProSense Jan 2013 #81
datasuspect Jan 2013 #83
RomneyLies Jan 2013 #85
datasuspect Jan 2013 #86
RomneyLies Jan 2013 #89
datasuspect Jan 2013 #91
RomneyLies Jan 2013 #92
datasuspect Jan 2013 #94
RomneyLies Jan 2013 #96
datasuspect Jan 2013 #99
LineLineLineLineLineLineLineLineLineLineReply .
RomneyLies Jan 2013 #107
ProSense Jan 2013 #87
datasuspect Jan 2013 #90
RomneyLies Jan 2013 #93
datasuspect Jan 2013 #95
RomneyLies Jan 2013 #98
datasuspect Jan 2013 #100
LineLineLineLineLineLineLineLineLineLineReply .
RomneyLies Jan 2013 #101
datasuspect Jan 2013 #102
LineLineLineLineLineLineLineLineLineLineReply .
RomneyLies Jan 2013 #103
grahamhgreen Jan 2013 #104
datasuspect Jan 2013 #105
RomneyLies Jan 2013 #110
datasuspect Jan 2013 #112
RomneyLies Jan 2013 #114
grahamhgreen Jan 2013 #115
datasuspect Jan 2013 #116
Sekhmets Daughter Jan 2013 #113
ProSense Jan 2013 #120
Sekhmets Daughter Jan 2013 #130
ProSense Jan 2013 #136
Sekhmets Daughter Jan 2013 #139
ProSense Jan 2013 #142
Sekhmets Daughter Jan 2013 #143
LittleBlue Jan 2013 #119
ProSense Jan 2013 #123
LittleBlue Jan 2013 #138
HiPointDem Jan 2013 #124
Nevernose Jan 2013 #126
ProSense Jan 2013 #129
HiPointDem Jan 2013 #147
datasuspect Jan 2013 #146
woo me with science Jan 2013 #157
HiPointDem Jan 2013 #141
Egalitarian Thug Jan 2013 #144
gulliver Jan 2013 #145
Scurrilous Jan 2013 #148
Cynicus Emeritus Jan 2013 #149
banned from Kos Jan 2013 #150
donheld Jan 2013 #164
Bonobo Jan 2013 #165
One of the 99 Jan 2013 #167