Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Fact - It will never happen. NYC_SKP Jan 2013 #1
Fact - Societies Change - DUI Laws, Gay Rights, Civil Rights - Gun Access Can Change as Well cantbeserious Jan 2013 #4
you realize many people survive by hunting, right? KittyWampus Jan 2013 #70
You Do Realize That A Gun Is Not The Only Method For Killing Wild Game? cantbeserious Jan 2013 #81
Now we are down to the level of comedy nadinbrzezinski Jan 2013 #83
Fact - You Are A good Comedian by Implying That Only Guns Can Be Used To Hunt Wild Game cantbeserious Jan 2013 #85
do look the fallacy reductio ad absurdum nadinbrzezinski Jan 2013 #90
The Fact Remains That A Gun Is Not The Only Method For Hunting Wild Game cantbeserious Jan 2013 #92
thw fact is that this is the logic fallacy you engage in nadinbrzezinski Jan 2013 #95
Is One Denying That Other Methods Are Used To Hunt Wild Game? cantbeserious Jan 2013 #97
your op is pure reductio ad absurdum nadinbrzezinski Jan 2013 #112
To The Contrary - Anything Created By Man Can Be UnCreated By Man - Guns In Society Are Not A Given cantbeserious Jan 2013 #129
I hunt elk with a can of beans. Common Sense Party Jan 2013 #252
Take a lot of deer with your hoopak, do you? Fla_Democrat Jan 2013 #139
Your Reference Is Too Obscure - Was This An attempt At Humor Or Sarcasm - If So, Both Failed cantbeserious Jan 2013 #147
Oh, I don't know.. Fla_Democrat Jan 2013 #167
So This Was An Ad Hominen Attack Based On Ridicule - Surely You Can Do Better cantbeserious Jan 2013 #168
Don't be silly Fla_Democrat Jan 2013 #173
Yet You Admitted To Using Ridicule To Debase Me - What Else Can That Be Than Ad Hominen cantbeserious Jan 2013 #175
That's why his user name is appropriate tradecenter Jan 2013 #86
When One Cannot Defend A Position One Attacks The Messenger - Classic Debating Mistake cantbeserious Jan 2013 #93
I don't have to defend anything. tradecenter Jan 2013 #104
All Change Begins With A First Step - That Some Are Unwilling To Take That Step Speaks Volumes cantbeserious Jan 2013 #149
i think you just nailed it obamanut2012 Jan 2013 #99
Be Advised That Your Post Is Considered An Ad Hominen Attack Under The DU Community Rules cantbeserious Jan 2013 #102
Then alert on it. tradecenter Jan 2013 #110
And You Have Just Admitted That The Attack Was Ad Hominen - Thanks For Outing Yourself cantbeserious Jan 2013 #148
You REALLY are making this way to easy. tradecenter Jan 2013 #247
It's the most efficient. KittyWampus Jan 2013 #89
Efficiency Is Not The Argument At Hand - There Are Other Methods For Hunting Wild Game cantbeserious Jan 2013 #91
including mitary grade nadinbrzezinski Jan 2013 #94
The Original Post Only Considers Firearms - The Discussion Has Not Been Broadened cantbeserious Jan 2013 #96
snaring a deer works so well obamanut2012 Jan 2013 #98
Seems Our Literature Is Replete With Stories Of Many Trappers That Used A Snare For Wild Game cantbeserious Jan 2013 #108
Literature = fiction Indydem Jan 2013 #123
Umm - I Guess You Have Never Read Non-Fiction cantbeserious Jan 2013 #150
Snares were mainly used to trap rabbits, beavers, and small game. tradecenter Jan 2013 #125
People eat reindeers tama Jan 2013 #204
Notice I said that rifles were "generally" used to bring down larger game. tradecenter Jan 2013 #246
Yes, you said generally tama Jan 2013 #248
True. tradecenter Jan 2013 #249
But without rifle tama Jan 2013 #250
You won't get any argument from me about what the Europeans did to the Native Americans. tradecenter Jan 2013 #251
I'm not against hunting with rifles tama Jan 2013 #255
Plus 1000. tradecenter Jan 2013 #256
excellent backwoodsbob Jan 2013 #127
No Advocacy Was Made - That Guns Are The Only Option For Those That Need To Feed Themselves cantbeserious Jan 2013 #151
the other options are snares and traps backwoodsbob Jan 2013 #162
actually, crossbows are the alternative. But since I'm refuting the OP'er I didn't mention it. KittyWampus Jan 2013 #211
I have a high end crossbow backwoodsbob Jan 2013 #214
Oops, after checking I just realized that crossbows are no longer legal in NY state. KittyWampus Jan 2013 #228
Many? Please provide the data on per cent of population that survive Warren Stupidity Jan 2013 #84
Why? Because you don't know anyone or live in a comfortable bubble? KittyWampus Jan 2013 #88
No because I doubt that "many" people in the us use hunting as their primary food source. Warren Stupidity Jan 2013 #111
Then you must live in either an urban or economic bubble. KittyWampus Jan 2013 #178
where is your data for your unsubstantiated assertion? Warren Stupidity Jan 2013 #179
Actually, you are the one making an unsubstantiated claim. That no Americans rely on hunting f/food. KittyWampus Jan 2013 #212
You made a claim that many people depend on hunting for survival. Warren Stupidity Jan 2013 #244
not really BS overthehillvet Jan 2013 #234
Link to your data source? Warren Stupidity Jan 2013 #243
Fact, this is as fringe as more gunz for everyone nadinbrzezinski Jan 2013 #2
So - You Are Advocating The "Acceptable Losses" Philosophy? cantbeserious Jan 2013 #7
No, I want regulations nadinbrzezinski Jan 2013 #24
So - With Regulations - One Is Still Advocating For "Acceptable Losses" cantbeserious Jan 2013 #37
You are going to have losses nadinbrzezinski Jan 2013 #46
If Guns Are Not Part Of The Society Then The Losses Will Be Astronomically Low cantbeserious Jan 2013 #48
Good luck with that nadinbrzezinski Jan 2013 #52
All Points Raised Have Been Addressed - Maybe The Logic Is Too Unsettling For Some cantbeserious Jan 2013 #58
What logic? nadinbrzezinski Jan 2013 #64
Reread The Original Post More Carefully - The Logic Is Unassailable cantbeserious Jan 2013 #146
Reductio ad absurdum nadinbrzezinski Jan 2013 #158
There Is No Logical Fallacy - Each Statement Proceeds Logically From The One Before cantbeserious Jan 2013 #160
Yes it is...and fantasy to boot nadinbrzezinski Jan 2013 #163
More Misdirection - Maybe One Should Reread The OP - Society Has A Choice To Make cantbeserious Jan 2013 #165
No misdirection nadinbrzezinski Jan 2013 #166
It Appears That One Is Unwilling To Face Their Personal Choice Which Has Become Clear In Context cantbeserious Jan 2013 #169
Which s exactly what? nadinbrzezinski Jan 2013 #170
You Appear To Be Advocating For The "Acceptable Losses" Policy In That The Problem Is So cantbeserious Jan 2013 #171
I live in the real world nadinbrzezinski Jan 2013 #172
All That Reads As Rationalization To Justify "Acceptable Losses" - Sometimes The Truth Is Unsettling cantbeserious Jan 2013 #174
What you call rationalization nadinbrzezinski Jan 2013 #176
Compromise Is Just A Fancy Word For Someone Wins And Someone Loses cantbeserious Jan 2013 #177
You haven't addressed jack derby378 Jan 2013 #67
Each And Every Counter Argument Has Been Addressed As Deflecting Rhetoric From The OP cantbeserious Jan 2013 #153
I'm a realist and I do try and look at the facts overthehillvet Jan 2013 #237
Actually, its well past that position ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2013 #8
So - You To Are Advocating The "Acceptable Losses" Philosophy? cantbeserious Jan 2013 #13
People engage in the "acceptable losses" philosophy EVERY SINGLE DAY. beevul Jan 2013 #229
So - It Would Be Acceptable If We Nominate Your Loved Ones To Be The Next "Acceptable Loss"? cantbeserious Jan 2013 #262
I didn't realize anyone was nominating anyone specifically. beevul Jan 2013 #266
If We Accept "Acceptable Losses" We Are Accepting A Probability - What Probability Will You Accept? cantbeserious Jan 2013 #267
So, precisely... 99Forever Jan 2013 #19
Yes - That Is The Question That The "Acceptable Losses" Crowd Must Address cantbeserious Jan 2013 #21
I want assault weapons to be designated under the 1934 nadinbrzezinski Jan 2013 #31
And of course you didn't answer the question. 99Forever Jan 2013 #44
Read post 37 nadinbrzezinski Jan 2013 #49
You still haven't answered the question. Post 37 wasn't even yours. 99Forever Jan 2013 #56
Since you can't find it nadinbrzezinski Jan 2013 #59
That "human slaughter" has been steadily declining for decades hack89 Jan 2013 #33
Tell that to the families of Sandy Hook. 99Forever Jan 2013 #42
Facts are not NRA talking points hack89 Jan 2013 #55
Can't read either? 99Forever Jan 2013 #60
What about the gun slaughter tama Jan 2013 #220
Not sure where "you start from"... 99Forever Jan 2013 #222
I'm pretty thin on suggestions. :) tama Jan 2013 #245
Except, of course, for weapons in the hands of government employees slackmaster Jan 2013 #3
No Guns Means No Guns cantbeserious Jan 2013 #9
No guns means un-inventing them and putting society back to conditions in the early 14th Century. slackmaster Jan 2013 #12
Some Said That Woman Would Never Receive The Right To Vote - Nay Saying Is Predictable cantbeserious Jan 2013 #14
You have one thing right. The root purpose of a gun is to destroy something. slackmaster Jan 2013 #15
Reread The Original Post More Carefully cantbeserious Jan 2013 #17
You're asking for a guarantee that bad things won't happen, in a world where bad things happen slackmaster Jan 2013 #18
No - Bad Things Happen - However, Those Bad Things Do Not Have To Be Caused By A Gun cantbeserious Jan 2013 #20
So how do you stop criminals from having guns? hack89 Jan 2013 #35
Any Firearm Use In The Act Of A Crime Will Be Met With An Automatic Judgment Of Death By The State cantbeserious Jan 2013 #47
The death penalty - what better way to show how we value human life. nt hack89 Jan 2013 #57
To Discourage Those That Would Choose To Use A Gun To Destroy Others - A Fair Question To Raise cantbeserious Jan 2013 #62
LOL! NYC_SKP Jan 2013 #63
The Use Of THe Death Penalty To Deter Crime Is A Fair Question For Another Discussion cantbeserious Jan 2013 #66
Wow, tradecenter Jan 2013 #69
Well, better make that police force full military Lurker Deluxe Jan 2013 #79
Enforce a law like that and you guarantee more gun deaths. RC Jan 2013 #116
Hope you... Puha Ekapi Jan 2013 #157
Why are you so cruel?..here is a case where just what you propose has happened PrincetonTiger2009 Jan 2013 #259
The State will have to use guns to enforce your law. GreenStormCloud Jan 2013 #279
Your proposal is the equivalent of uninventing women. beevul Jan 2013 #232
kick samsingh Jan 2013 #5
Fact - your post is hyperbole geckosfeet Jan 2013 #6
Fact - Unassailable Logic Is Often Not Palatable cantbeserious Jan 2013 #10
Logic: "the science that investigates the principles governing correct or reliable inference" geckosfeet Jan 2013 #22
No - Your Desire To Negate Logic Is The Unsupportable Assertion - The OP Logic Is Unassailable cantbeserious Jan 2013 #23
Even countries with outright bans have firearm homcides geckosfeet Jan 2013 #71
The Logic Remains Unassailable - To Eliminate Destruction By Firearms - Eliminate The Firearms cantbeserious Jan 2013 #100
Well - let us know when you get back to the real world. geckosfeet Jan 2013 #126
Firmly Living In The Real World Today cantbeserious Jan 2013 #140
The real world is - the guns are here. geckosfeet Jan 2013 #258
Sure, and to eliminate destruction caused by drunk driving, eliminate alcohol. Common Sense Party Jan 2013 #253
Bravo. This should be our starting position. Robb Jan 2013 #11
Good point. n/t AndyA Jan 2013 #16
Thank you. Robb Jan 2013 #27
Except that "calling for guns in schools" sylvi Jan 2013 #230
Life is full of peril. Too fucking bad. Robb Jan 2013 #231
Unresponsive sylvi Jan 2013 #235
Not by you; I'd prefer you underestimate me. Robb Jan 2013 #236
I don't think it's possible to underestimate you. nt sylvi Jan 2013 #238
Zing! Robb Jan 2013 #240
Are you going to be on the confiscation team? tradecenter Jan 2013 #25
Fact - Nothing On This Earth Has To Be Part Of Any Culture Should The Society Decide It So cantbeserious Jan 2013 #41
Heres my answer to you. tradecenter Jan 2013 #43
Fact - Societies Can Choose Again cantbeserious Jan 2013 #50
Logically sound... Lizzie Poppet Jan 2013 #26
Logic Stands On Its Own - Making The Case Is Simple - Do We Want People To Die By Firearms? cantbeserious Jan 2013 #30
Of course. But as I said, the logic in your initial post doesn't speak to attainability. Lizzie Poppet Jan 2013 #36
Fact - Attainability Is Not An Impediment - We Changed DUI Laws, Smoking Laws, Marriage Laws Etc... cantbeserious Jan 2013 #39
I have to disagree. Lizzie Poppet Jan 2013 #45
Fact - Booze And Pot Do Not Have As Their Fundamental Purpose To Destroy Something Or Someone cantbeserious Jan 2013 #54
Fact- booze and pot are not a right. tradecenter Jan 2013 #61
Fact - Any Amendment To The Constitution Can Be Repealed - It Is Part Of Our Constitution cantbeserious Jan 2013 #65
Then you should get right on it. tradecenter Jan 2013 #75
Doesn't change the argument I was making in the least. Lizzie Poppet Jan 2013 #122
Is it also "fact" dems_rightnow Jan 2013 #53
Fact - That Society Chooses To Condone Unacceptable Behavior Is Clear - Gun Violence This Discussion cantbeserious Jan 2013 #73
Great answer to the question... dems_rightnow Jan 2013 #76
Nothing Was Ignored - The Choice Is Clear - "Acceptable Losses" From Guns Or A Zero Tolerance Policy cantbeserious Jan 2013 #78
I Totally and Unequivocably Choose "Acceptable Losses" Over a Zero Tolerance Policy. NYC_SKP Jan 2013 #106
None - You Have Chosen To Relive The Terror Of Newtown On A Ongoing Basis - That Speaks Volumes cantbeserious Jan 2013 #156
Gradually. Please emphasize gradually. Loudly Jan 2013 #28
Fact - Your screen name is ... oldhippie Jan 2013 #29
Be Advised - That Is Considered An Ad Hominen Attack And Is Against The Rules Of DU cantbeserious Jan 2013 #32
Except, for better or worse, that rule has been effectively tossed. Lizzie Poppet Jan 2013 #38
Well - If The Ad Hominen Attacks Continue It Is Within The Community Rules To Alert cantbeserious Jan 2013 #40
And I encourage that...but without a lot of confidence in things changing. Lizzie Poppet Jan 2013 #51
Now, really, how can you consider a compliment ... oldhippie Jan 2013 #118
THEIR guns are making US unsafe cpwm17 Jan 2013 #34
Fact is: you got a better chance of winning the lottery. hobbit709 Jan 2013 #68
Fact - Someone Always Wins The Lottery Eventually cantbeserious Jan 2013 #74
Fact: one of these days the sun will expand to a red giant. hobbit709 Jan 2013 #80
False Equivalencies - All Guns Can Be Eliminated Long Before The Sun Goes Nova - As For Norway cantbeserious Jan 2013 #82
Your mind is made up with your own unrealistic facts. hobbit709 Jan 2013 #87
Facts Are Facts - Logic Is Logic - Maybe Your Mind Is Closed cantbeserious Jan 2013 #137
Our Sun won't go nova, it will expand to a red giant. GreenStormCloud Jan 2013 #280
I agree that guns' whole purpose is destruction duhneece Jan 2013 #72
Then To Be Clear - One Is Condoning The "Acceptable Losses" Argument cantbeserious Jan 2013 #77
Yes, similar to car deaths duhneece Jan 2013 #218
This message was self-deleted by its author guardian Jan 2013 #101
Reread The Original Post More Carefully - Pay Attention To What Was Not Said cantbeserious Jan 2013 #103
Why stop there? FreeJoe Jan 2013 #105
Truly This Post Does Represent A Logical Absurdity Because It Begins With A Non-Tangible Proposition cantbeserious Jan 2013 #114
Are you serious? FreeJoe Jan 2013 #117
Facts Speak For Themselves - Logic Is Logic - The Fantasy Is That Nothing Can Be Done cantbeserious Jan 2013 #138
Your user name is "cantbeserious" obamanut2012 Jan 2013 #107
My User Name Is Not The Topic At Hand - Is Attacking The Messenger The Best You Have To Offer? cantbeserious Jan 2013 #113
Oh, NO! No one would ever attack the messenger around here ..... oldhippie Jan 2013 #120
If One Is A Right Wing Troll Or A NRA Shill Then That Is Not Necessarily An Ad Hominen Attack cantbeserious Jan 2013 #133
What is one if, actually, an unserious, self-aggrandizing fool? Common Sense Party Jan 2013 #260
Ahhh. This type of rhetoric feeds right in to NRA's rhetoric about gun grabbers aikoaiko Jan 2013 #109
Now It Makes Sense FreeJoe Jan 2013 #119
No Troll - Have Voted Progressively My Entire Life - Logic Dictates That A Choice Be Made cantbeserious Jan 2013 #134
I totally destroyed those stick-on paper targets. Deep13 Jan 2013 #115
Logic Dictates That We Do Not Conflate The Issues - Stick With One Challenge At A Time cantbeserious Jan 2013 #143
Reality just isn't that linear. Deep13 Jan 2013 #155
Reality Is As Linear As Society Chooses To Make It cantbeserious Jan 2013 #159
So - you are advocating the "Acceptable Losses" philosophy? Recursion Jan 2013 #121
No - Logic Dictates Otherwise - It Is Society That Deems Dead Children As "Acceptable Losses" cantbeserious Jan 2013 #132
Fact - what you purpose is impossible to inact. Rex Jan 2013 #124
Fact - Defeatist Attitudes Will Doom Most Endeavors - You Knew That When You Posted cantbeserious Jan 2013 #130
This thread is more fun than a barrel of monkeys. rrneck Jan 2013 #128
Glad That The Unnecessary Deaths Of Innocent Woman And Children Brings You Amusement cantbeserious Jan 2013 #135
Glad you would leverage a tragedy to feed on your own sanctimony. rrneck Jan 2013 #141
Not Leaning On Tragedy - The Tragedy Is The Motivation And Root Of The OP Logic cantbeserious Jan 2013 #144
The OP is self serving hyperbole. nt rrneck Jan 2013 #181
The OP States The Facts And Draws A Conclusion Based On Logic - Society Must Choose cantbeserious Jan 2013 #183
Do you know the difference between rrneck Jan 2013 #184
Yes - Of Course cantbeserious Jan 2013 #191
Then is rrneck Jan 2013 #194
Society Must Choose Which Methods Of Death Are Acceptable And Unacceptable cantbeserious Jan 2013 #195
Is death by baseball bat acceptable? nt rrneck Jan 2013 #197
Asked And Answered cantbeserious Jan 2013 #202
Asked and avoided. rrneck Jan 2013 #217
That is kind of true. ZombieHorde Jan 2013 #131
Reread The Original Post More Carefully - Pay Attention To What Was Not Said cantbeserious Jan 2013 #136
You absolutely get bonus points for not mentioning Hitler. nt ZombieHorde Jan 2013 #213
Fact - Prohibitions fail. You'll never eliminate most of the 300,000,000 firearms. n/t OneTenthofOnePercent Jan 2013 #142
Fact - Defeatist Thinking Will Doom Most Endeavors cantbeserious Jan 2013 #145
There's a difference between being realistic and unecessarily defeatist. OneTenthofOnePercent Jan 2013 #219
In response to your last paragraph... cherokeeprogressive Jan 2013 #152
False Misdirection - Eliminating Guns Would Mean Stiff Penalties For Those Breaking New Gun Laws cantbeserious Jan 2013 #154
So you're a Death Penalty Advocate then? We have that already. Doesn't stop murderers. cherokeeprogressive Jan 2013 #161
No Advocacy Was Made - It Is Axiomatic That Guns Will Exist Elsewhere - Those Choosing To Use Guns cantbeserious Jan 2013 #164
Perhaps so, just like bow and arrows or spears or swords or blowguns TheKentuckian Jan 2013 #180
So You Are In Support Of The "Acceptable Losses" Defense - Duly Noted cantbeserious Jan 2013 #182
If NRA was interested in protecting the right to bear arms they would promote less killing. Thinkingabout Jan 2013 #185
Yes - Agree - The NRA Has Become Its Own Worst Enemy cantbeserious Jan 2013 #190
Works for me. Unfortunately it'll never happen, just like I won't wake up tomorrow a size 5. MotherPetrie Jan 2013 #186
All Change Begins With the First Step - Society Must Choose If "Acceptable Losses" Are To Be Tolerated cantbeserious Jan 2013 #189
Fact. I own a gun for that very purpose. Throd Jan 2013 #187
The Self Defense Argument As One Of The Many Compromises Justifying "Acceptable Losses" cantbeserious Jan 2013 #188
Shooting an intruder is a completely acceptable loss from my perspective. Throd Jan 2013 #192
Yes - Your Position Is Clear - The Price Of Gun Ownership Is "Acceptable Losses" In Society cantbeserious Jan 2013 #193
People have the right to defend themselves in their homes. Throd Jan 2013 #196
Yes - But Maybe Not With Firearms If Society Chooses Otherwise cantbeserious Jan 2013 #200
I don't care what you or society thinks about defending my home with fireams. Throd Jan 2013 #208
How else are you suggesting people defend themselves in their homes? Common Sense Party Jan 2013 #254
Acceptable Losses is a concept and policy ..... oldhippie Jan 2013 #209
Thank you sylvi Jan 2013 #242
This thread is hilarious. flvegan Jan 2013 #198
Glad That The Unnecessary Deaths Of Innocent Woman And Children Brings You Amusement cantbeserious Jan 2013 #199
Thank you for inventing dems_rightnow Jan 2013 #215
First, it doesn't and only an idiot would suggest such a thing. flvegan Jan 2013 #216
Great thread! zappaman Jan 2013 #201
OK tama Jan 2013 #203
There Was No Mention Of Disarming The Well Regulated Militia That Is Our Army, Navy And Air Force cantbeserious Jan 2013 #205
Get real tama Jan 2013 #210
You can't be serious. LOL. rightsideout Jan 2013 #206
Fact- Hysterical knee jerk reactions based on emotion SQUEE Jan 2013 #207
Why would you feel this is a "knee jerk reaction"? Are the most recent jmg257 Jan 2013 #221
Discussion, yes, by all means. SQUEE Jan 2013 #223
Its only absurd because you don't agree with. He's right though... jmg257 Jan 2013 #224
and if there were no <fill in blank>...oh what a wonderful world this would be. SQUEE Jan 2013 #225
So, what's your point? Does the number of existing guns change his fact with regards to the jmg257 Jan 2013 #226
Again it is an absurd concept, not based in reality. SQUEE Jan 2013 #227
Why? Because you agree that, although a strange concept, it is the thruth? jmg257 Jan 2013 #233
Guns have no single intrinsic purpose sylvi Jan 2013 #239
ZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz Remmah2 Jan 2013 #241
Glad To See You Enjoying Your Snooze When The Parents Of Sandy Hook Will Live A Life Of Tragedy cantbeserious Jan 2013 #265
Action not emotion solves problems. Remmah2 Jan 2013 #269
Exactly - Sleeping Will Accomplish Nothing cantbeserious Jan 2013 #270
Drugs are illegal... LibertyMonger Jan 2013 #257
I'm not willing to be under teabagger rule in order to have a gun free America ecstatic Jan 2013 #261
A Short Term Strategy - Merits Further Consideration cantbeserious Jan 2013 #274
Gong on you....they have three purposes. ileus Jan 2013 #263
The One Pulling The Trigger Reverts To The Definition Above - Destroy What Is In Front Of The Barrel cantbeserious Jan 2013 #264
yet another person confusing fact and opinion. ho hum. cali Jan 2013 #268
Facts Are Clear - To What Opinion Do You Refer? cantbeserious Jan 2013 #271
Dream on. LAGC Jan 2013 #272
No Dream - Societies Change - Guns Can Be Purged - All It Takes Is Courage And The First Step cantbeserious Jan 2013 #273
You're the NRA's best spokesperson. LAGC Jan 2013 #275
Shame That You Are So Short Sighted cantbeserious Jan 2013 #276
Keep making the NRA's case for them, that gun controllers really want to ban all guns. LAGC Jan 2013 #277
Ah, One Misses The Point Entirely - Shame That Your Mind And Eyes Are So Myopic cantbeserious Jan 2013 #278
On the day you eliminate guns from the world, the following will happen: GreenStormCloud Jan 2013 #281
What A Pessimistic World View You Espouse - That Humanity Cannot Grow And Change - You Have My Pity cantbeserious Jan 2013 #282
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Fact - Guns Have One Purp...»Reply #7