Reply #26

In the discussion thread: Only a real coward would want to use the kind of guns the NRA says are for hunting. nt [View all]

Response to Fumesucker (Reply #24)

Thu Jan 3, 2013, 10:53 PM

jody (26,624 posts)

26. Fumesucker OP linked guns with hunting. True I and others do use handguns for hunting but that's a

minority of hunters.

OP was almost certainly talking about rifles since those are the ones with large magazines and scary looking things like a bayonet lug, or made from composites.

Fact is handguns were used in 6,009 of the total12,996 homicides in 2010.

People who want to ban or control firearms undefined will fail.

If they take the time to learn the language of violent crime and what weapons are used to murder, then they just might common ground with many pro-RKBA Democrats and seek solutions that make it more difficult to get firearms.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

87 replies	Author	Time	Post
Only a real coward would want to use the kind of guns the NRA says are for hunting. nt [View all]	kelliekat44	Jan 2013	OP
Apparently you hate guns. Do you believe they create crime? nt	jody	Jan 2013	#1
they certainly facilitate it.	spanone	Jan 2013	#2
OK but what guns do you hate and why? nt	jody	Jan 2013	#4
What guns do you love and why?	neverforget	Jan 2013	#12
And they can prevent it	ProgressiveProfessor	Jan 2013	#6
Sure they can, but I'm betting they enable as many, if not more, than they stop. nt	white_wolf	Jan 2013	#9
I think guns are capable of creating crime and in some cases they do	Fumesucker	Jan 2013	#3
OK but what guns do you hate and why? nt	jody	Jan 2013	#5
I don't hate any inanimate object and try not to hate anyone	Fumesucker	Jan 2013	#11
I think	Berserker	Jan 2013	#10
Rapists wear condoms?	Fumesucker	Jan 2013	#14
How else do they not leave DNA evidence?	hack89	Jan 2013	#48
So condoms make negligent rape common?	Fumesucker	Jan 2013	#49
They makes it easier for those predisposed to rape or kill	hack89	Jan 2013	#52
So the young woman was predisposed to kill her brother?	Fumesucker	Jan 2013	#57
I distinguish between crimes and accidents	hack89	Jan 2013	#58
Negligent manslaughter carries no criminal penalties?	Fumesucker	Jan 2013	#59
And there are many things that can kill when used in a negligent manner.	hack89	Jan 2013	#60
Nuclear weapons used negligently can kill	Fumesucker	Jan 2013	#61
Look at just accidental gun deaths	hack89	Jan 2013	#62
You still are trying desperately to equate non negligent acts with negligent ones	Fumesucker	Jan 2013	#63
Is there such a thing as a non-negligent gun accident that kills someone?	hack89	Jan 2013	#65
Negligent nuclear weapons use has never killed anyone	Fumesucker	Jan 2013	#66
The issue with nukes is not negligent use - it is malicious deliberate use. Just like with guns. nt	hack89	Jan 2013	#67
I already pointed out that nuclear weapons have killed far fewer people than guns	Fumesucker	Jan 2013	#68
When a single gun can kill ten million people in a second let me know.	hack89	Jan 2013	#69
Only a matter of degree and not of kind between guns and nukes	Fumesucker	Jan 2013	#70
It is very much a matter of kind	hack89	Jan 2013	#71
Hand grenades are not crew served weapons and nukes don't have to be	Fumesucker	Jan 2013	#72
You will always pick a number that justifies draconian gun control laws	hack89	Jan 2013	#73
And you will always pick a number that allows for casual mass slaughter	Fumesucker	Jan 2013	#74
Hand grenades are not protected by the 2A	hack89	Jan 2013	#75
The Constitution does not mention "guns", it uses the more general term "arms"	Fumesucker	Jan 2013	#80
We have already discussed this	hack89	Jan 2013	#81
Agree and the Heller opinion said:	jody	Jan 2013	#85
Condoms were invented to prevent unwanted pregnancy	duhneece	Jan 2013	#78
So you hate all guns? Of every kind? Because that lady killed her brother with one? How 'bout knives	Honeycombe8	Jan 2013	#19
If the gun wasn't there, would the young man now be dead of a gunshot wound inflicted by his sister?	Fumesucker	Jan 2013	#22
If the kitchen knives weren't there, would that teen's mother still be alive?	Honeycombe8	Jan 2013	#43
English? Do you speak it?	Fumesucker	Jan 2013	#44
NO doubt about that	madokie	Jan 2013	#47
How does a gun "create" crime?	Puzzledtraveller	Jan 2013	#50
Negligent manslaughter is not a crime?	Fumesucker	Jan 2013	#51
And you love 'em	nadinbrzezinski	Jan 2013	#7
That's a huge stretch.	white_wolf	Jan 2013	#8
I can infer anything I wish. OP author can reply or not. nt	jody	Jan 2013	#13
And the rest of us are free to point and laugh when you make a laughable inference	Fumesucker	Jan 2013	#16
At least readers know "3. I think guns are capable of creating crime". FBI reports for 2010	jody	Jan 2013	#23
This is my rifle, this is my gun, this is for shooting, this is for fun	Fumesucker	Jan 2013	#24
Fumesucker OP linked guns with hunting. True I and others do use handguns for hunting but that's a	jody	Jan 2013	#26
I know that violence including gun crime has been declining steadily for some time now	Fumesucker	Jan 2013	#31
OK, we can concentrate on handguns since they are used in about 50% of murders.	jody	Jan 2013	#34
I'm reminded of an old Yakov Smirnoff joke	Fumesucker	Jan 2013	#40
LOL those who want to ban all firearms attack those who want no bans and vice versa.	jody	Jan 2013	#84
Heh! The gun coward rings in!	madinmaryland	Jan 2013	#15
Bullshit premise.	Occulus	Jan 2013	#17
Yes I know they create crime by making evil things possible, even glamorous in a sick way	MightyMopar	Jan 2013	#53
Looks like an NRA talking point to me.	rrneck	Jan 2013	#64
Why?? Wouldn't much depend on what they want to use them for?	jmg257	Jan 2013	#18
Want to see pics of my penis?	-..__...	Jan 2013	#20
Please proceed, governor n/t	Fumesucker	Jan 2013	#25
Message deleted by the DU Administrators	-..__...	Jan 2013	#27
that's fucked up you'd post that man....	dionysus	Jan 2013	#29
Relax... "man"...	-..__...	Jan 2013	#33
Well that POS got shown the door.	JTFrog	Jan 2013	#86
:)	dionysus	Jan 2013	#87
Mitt? Is that you?	Fumesucker	Jan 2013	#32
The magic underwear chaffs my shaft.	-..__...	Jan 2013	#35
You sure that's not caused by the pistols in your pockets?	Fumesucker	Jan 2013	#36
I'm generally opposed to "Mexican carry" for the obvious flaws...	-..__...	Jan 2013	#37
Well, in your case it wouldn't make all that much difference anyway	Fumesucker	Jan 2013	#39
Aim small... miss small.	-..__...	Jan 2013	#41
They must be afraid of getting gored by a buck, moose or wild hog!	Auntie Bush	Jan 2013	#21
Nonsense.	MrSlayer	Jan 2013	#28
WTF kind of guns are those?	cliffordu	Jan 2013	#30
Clearly a coward.	Marinedem	Jan 2013	#38
Don't worry , most won't even know or care who he is .	former-republican	Jan 2013	#42
No, a real coward bases it all in hunting.	flvegan	Jan 2013	#45
I've always said that if you want to impress with your hunting prowess,	Egalitarian Thug	Jan 2013	#46
I am stupider for having read this thread.	Atman	Jan 2013	#54
Very well said! nt	Pholus	Jan 2013	#55
I'm only replying because I want reply	duhneece	Jan 2013	#83
About 80% of gun owners don't hunt. N/T	GreenStormCloud	Jan 2013	#56
coward or worse	samsingh	Jan 2013	#76
I find hunting with high powered weapons to be cowardice too..	and-justice-for-all	Jan 2013	#77
You and your fancy bows and arrows..	X_Digger	Jan 2013	#79
How is it cowardly? nt	ZombieHorde	Jan 2013	#82

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.