Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

PufPuf23

(8,764 posts)

4. I agree that "under-reported" is more apt.

Reply to cthulu2016 (Reply #1)

Thu Jan 3, 2013, 04:35 PM

Jan 2013

Project Censored is more than 35 years old and that is what they call themselves.

Project Censor also calls them stories of 2013 when they really mean ranked and reported in 2013 for 2012 stories.

I am just the messenger but do support Project Censored.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Project Censored: Top Censored Stories of 2013 [View all] PufPuf23 Jan 2013 OP

Substitute "under-reported" for "censored" and it's an okay list. cthulu2016 Jan 2013 #1

I was going to say something like that. RevStPatrick Jan 2013 #2

Agreed. n/t X_Digger Jan 2013 #3

I agree that "under-reported" is more apt. PufPuf23 Jan 2013 #4

"Project Under-Reported" just doesn't have that alarming *zing* to it. Bucky Jan 2013 #6

"Move along. Nothing to see here." - Tow Talli Tarian Berlum Jan 2013 #5