Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

HeroBrand

(11 posts)
18. .
Wed Jan 2, 2013, 12:21 PM
Jan 2013

To a neutral observer, the threat of increased taxation at a higher level of success would cause a tendency to avoid success as a means of avoiding higher taxes.

.......... Angry Dragon Jan 2013 #1
. HeroBrand Jan 2013 #2
that's the best username you could come up with? snooper2 Jan 2013 #3
I have a question for you. yardwork Jan 2013 #4
Post removed Post removed Jan 2013 #7
And what did we get from those who benefited by over 2 trillion dollars sabrina 1 Jan 2013 #15
. HeroBrand Jan 2013 #18
They've had 12 YEARS to create jobs. EOTE Jan 2013 #23
You are advocating supply side economics buzzroller Jan 2013 #29
How unbelievably stupid. smirkymonkey Jan 2013 #42
Save Your Energy HangOnKids Jan 2013 #47
Are you kidding? Lol, well, I'll take a million dollars a year and pay sabrina 1 Jan 2013 #56
Despite the seeming negative incentive, the wealthy have a much higher share than before. yardwork Jan 2013 #25
You are R Troll and listen to Rush to much! imanamerican63 Jan 2013 #34
As long as FOX News viewing dupes keep repeating the myth PA Democrat Jan 2013 #5
. HeroBrand Jan 2013 #8
Then how do you explain Romney paying 12% on his many millions of income? EOTE Jan 2013 #14
A fact? Do you know the definition of the word? SomethingFishy Jan 2013 #52
Aw. Someone sent him home to his buddies at FAUX News. PA Democrat Jan 2013 #55
That's because the 2% make much more than the average American Fumesucker Jan 2013 #6
. HeroBrand Jan 2013 #9
The great bulk of it IS due to the Bush tax cuts. EOTE Jan 2013 #12
. HeroBrand Jan 2013 #16
Wow, not terribly bright, are you? EOTE Jan 2013 #19
unfortunately, they are not expiring hfojvt Jan 2013 #28
I'll take it as a partial victory. EOTE Jan 2013 #30
apparently citizens are never gonna get fired up hfojvt Jan 2013 #48
I'm not placated, just willing to accept this as a positive change. EOTE Jan 2013 #49
no, is some cases it is even worse than 2010 hfojvt Jan 2013 #53
Taxes aren't a penalty. Taxes are paying your fair share in contributing to our great country. Lex Jan 2013 #36
Thank YOU! smirkymonkey Jan 2013 #43
The government borrows the money for the tax cuts from the Chinese and then they pay interest on it, yortsed snacilbuper Jan 2013 #37
Do you deny that the Bush tax cuts were touted as being great for the economy? Fumesucker Jan 2013 #22
As well they should, we do have a PROGRESSIVE tax system. EOTE Jan 2013 #10
. HeroBrand Jan 2013 #13
They can afford to pay more because they choose to live in America, where we have a progressive tax EOTE Jan 2013 #17
it's pretty obvious that they can afford to pay more hfojvt Jan 2013 #27
Instead of focusing on those making $450,000, focus on those making $500 million. yardwork Jan 2013 #32
fuck the 99% hfojvt Jan 2013 #46
Yes, it's terrible. And this is the reason our country has so little money for infrastructure. yardwork Jan 2013 #51
it is the top 50% that has 80% of the pie hfojvt Jan 2013 #54
Is that a questions? imanamerican63 Jan 2013 #26
The percentage of taxes should not be the same. The very wealthy should pay a higher percentage. yardwork Jan 2013 #35
I agree, I was trying keep my point simple to him! imanamerican63 Jan 2013 #41
I agreed with your point that the 1% actually pay a lot lower percent in taxes, due to tax dodges yardwork Jan 2013 #44
Enjoy your short stay on DU! Harmony Blue Jan 2013 #50
I'm not sure its going to be a fair share madokie Jan 2013 #11
You are right buzzroller Jan 2013 #24
The tax rate on the very wealthy is so much less than it was in the 1960s and 70s. yardwork Jan 2013 #38
I would too, if it was true hfojvt Jan 2013 #20
The homeless are celebrating n/t L0oniX Jan 2013 #21
Not even close to a "fair share" NCTraveler Jan 2013 #31
Good point! imanamerican63 Jan 2013 #33
I was trying to make a joke about the tea baggers! imanamerican63 Jan 2013 #39
More like the .5% nt lumberjack_jeff Jan 2013 #40
We'll see, at that level, they're good at hiding income, and besides, isn't it... johnnyrocket Jan 2013 #45
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I feel better that the 2%...»Reply #18