Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,503 posts)
32. It has not always been like this
Mon Dec 31, 2012, 10:44 PM
Dec 2012

http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2011/03/03/147994/unions-income-inequality/



By Zaid Jilani on Mar 3, 2011 at 9:55 am

Across the country, right-wing legislators continue their attack on labor unions, claiming that they are saving their states money. Yet in waging these anti-labor campaigns, these politicians are ignoring one very simple fact: unions were a major force in building and sustaining the great American middle class, and as they declined, so has the middle class. As CAP’s Karla Waters and David Madland showed in a report they first published this past January, as union membership has steadily declined since 1967, so too has the middle class’s share of national income, as the super-rich have taken a larger share of national income than any time since the 1920s:

FULL story at link.

The 250K pledge is important [View all] ProSense Dec 2012 OP
yawn. How did that Ralph Nader thingy work out in 2000 for the whiners then? graham4anything Dec 2012 #1
How's the weather on Mars? ProSense Dec 2012 #2
you remind me of the writing of graham4anything Dec 2012 #5
You remind me, ProSense Dec 2012 #6
yet another ad hominem how quaint graham4anything Dec 2012 #7
Why are you allowing this thread to ProSense Dec 2012 #9
honestly ProSense (and I have thought this for some time now) he vaguely reminds me of Tuesday Afternoon Dec 2012 #17
Oh my! kentuck Dec 2012 #20
... SammyWinstonJack Dec 2012 #23
LOL Skittles Dec 2012 #4
Desperate and despicable. This is entirely representative of the biggest problem we have faced for Egalitarian Thug Dec 2012 #11
You really have no clue whatsoever, do you? RomneyLies Dec 2012 #8
Post removed Post removed Dec 2012 #15
Are you somehow insinuating that... former_con Dec 2012 #25
However, the Job Creators have signed a pledge to create 20 million Angry Dragon Dec 2012 #3
Lesson learned: Promises are for suckers. n/t L0oniX Dec 2012 #10
Aw, c'mon. You don't seriously expect President Obama to do what Candidate Obama promised, do you? kath Dec 2012 #12
maybe, but $450,000 isn't much worse bigtree Dec 2012 #13
So nineteen50 Dec 2012 #14
I don't recall Obama making a $250,000 "pledge." kelliekat44 Dec 2012 #16
It's conflating with the "if you make 250k or less, your taxes will go down" bit. Robb Dec 2012 #22
That's how I recall it. I ALWAYS expected the $250k to go up, that it was a negotiation starting Honeycombe8 Dec 2012 #26
Thank you! nt kelliekat44 Jan 2013 #39
Excellent OP Prosense. Thank you. In another thread many people seem to be saying In Truth We Trust Dec 2012 #18
Agree. (link) Atticus Dec 2012 #19
$450k is fine railsback Dec 2012 #21
+1. Honeycombe8 Dec 2012 #27
Actually, you want to know the specifgics instead of this generality stanch because Coyotl Dec 2012 #31
$450k isn't that much in today's terms railsback Jan 2013 #42
The millionaires and billionaires get the same tax cut JoeDuck Dec 2012 #35
Yes, everyone gets the same cuts up to $450k (married) railsback Jan 2013 #43
The revenue we gave up is negligible anyway. The GOP was fighting for ~$1500 in tax cuts per year high density Jan 2013 #40
It is true that Democrats former_con Dec 2012 #24
+1000 Myrina Dec 2012 #30
I ALWAYS thought the $250k would go up, that it was a negotiating starting point. Honeycombe8 Dec 2012 #28
Post removed Post removed Dec 2012 #29
It has not always been like this Omaha Steve Dec 2012 #32
it was only a starting point. Obama had to compromise a little. Don't sweat the small stuff!!!! NewEngland4Obama Dec 2012 #33
In Case You Missed It... former_con Dec 2012 #34
But the revenue generated would've come from those who could least afford it. Honeycombe8 Jan 2013 #37
Yes not yet anyway former_con Jan 2013 #41
Great article Demo_Chris Jan 2013 #36
I have to agree with this article my father is on social security he makes 789 a month that's 9,468 Arcanetrance Jan 2013 #38
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The 250K pledge is import...»Reply #32