Reply #36

In the discussion thread: They planned to kill us "if deemed necessary." [View all]

Response to AZ Progressive (Reply #31)

Mon Dec 31, 2012, 02:00 AM

DollarBillHines (1,922 posts)

36. That's it, right there.

They were there, before it ever got started.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

78 replies	Author	Time	Post
They planned to kill us "if deemed necessary." [View all]	FourScore	Dec 2012	OP
It seems from these docs	AldoLeopold	Dec 2012	#1
Denials that this happened	nadinbrzezinski	Dec 2012	#2
You mean when Naomi first broke the story in November, 2011?	Zorra	Dec 2012	#12
Yup	nadinbrzezinski	Dec 2012	#13
The fervent denials on DU back then would be comical if they weren't so naive.	Zorra	Dec 2012	#14
And this looks like a news dump	nadinbrzezinski	Dec 2012	#15
Have you read the documents?	creeksneakers2	Dec 2012	#28
Alex Jones-ers like Wolf come up with their lie first, then try to force the "facts" to fit	Adenoid_Hynkel	Dec 2012	#30
What?	JDPriestly	Dec 2012	#39
When Germany "Occupied" France was it a hostile act?	creeksneakers2	Dec 2012	#44
"Occupying" publicly owned land in your own country is not at all comparable to invading and then	JDPriestly	Dec 2012	#45
I guess then according to you the Boston Tea Party was a hostile act.n/t	Cleita	Dec 2012	#55
To the British it was	creeksneakers2	Dec 2012	#74
So you get the comparison.	Cleita	Dec 2012	#76
Except the Boston TP didn't take years to get their objectives accomplished.	randome	Jan 2013	#77
Yeah	creeksneakers2	Jan 2013	#78
After reading her article - she's not a reporter, she's not an analyst, she's...	reACTIONary	Dec 2012	#57
both. though you forgot "sad and pathetic," too.	villager	Dec 2012	#32
I don't deny what that document says	creeksneakers2	Dec 2012	#26
This s a part of the collection of documents	nadinbrzezinski	Dec 2012	#27
The documents aren't any such thing.	creeksneakers2	Dec 2012	#29
Yes they are	nadinbrzezinski	Dec 2012	#33
Not down the memory hole here	creeksneakers2	Dec 2012	#35
I imagined the raids then	nadinbrzezinski	Dec 2012	#51
There are over 400 pages of documents there.	OnyxCollie	Dec 2012	#75
Problem is that the report, thanks to the blacked out portions, is not clear as to who	JDPriestly	Dec 2012	#46
That would be an enormous problem	creeksneakers2	Dec 2012	#73
kr	HiPointDem	Dec 2012	#3
Tea Baggers protests are protected	cbrer	Dec 2012	#4
You either trust ONLY the government (with guns,etc) or you do not	The Straight Story	Dec 2012	#5
None s coming for your potato shooter	nadinbrzezinski	Dec 2012	#6
You don't even need an assualt rifle	oldbanjo	Dec 2012	#65
As I said, you don't need an AR-15	nadinbrzezinski	Dec 2012	#70
K&R'd, and	snot	Dec 2012	#7
+1000	FourScore	Dec 2012	#16
Too late!	Spryguy	Dec 2012	#62
Sadly, this isn't shocking or surprising in the least...	VOX	Dec 2012	#8
K & R	AzDar	Dec 2012	#9
God Bless America...	L0oniX	Dec 2012	#10
We trust this organization to protect us?	Undismayed	Dec 2012	#11
uh, yeah. cause people 'planning sniper attacks' write like a 3rd grader.	pasto76	Dec 2012	#17
I think you may have indentified a large part of the problem.	cherokeeprogressive	Dec 2012	#19
The police response to Occupy has been brutal and disgusting.	white_wolf	Dec 2012	#20
I 100% agree.	oldbanjo	Dec 2012	#67
So DHS made that up?	nadinbrzezinski	Dec 2012	#21
uh, yeah, cause police never fire on innocent people	RedCappedBandit	Dec 2012	#22
Please provide even one single link from this site where "a liberal" asserts	FourScore	Dec 2012	#23
Are you suggesting	JReed	Dec 2012	#25
I had to go back all the way to Dec 6 2012 to find this story	Fumesucker	Dec 2012	#34
There wasn't any rioting by OWS people in LA that I am aware of.	JDPriestly	Dec 2012	#42
Good post.	Blanks	Dec 2012	#50
The historical record is rife with police who have fired on unarmed protesters, even in modern	HiPointDem	Dec 2012	#47
Except maybe teargas canisters into a young man's head	Marrah_G	Dec 2012	#58
I'm just wondering how you know what "if deemed necessary" means.	Prometheus Bound	Dec 2012	#61
It looked to me like the Police were trying to start a Riot.	oldbanjo	Dec 2012	#66
I wish this was an Onion headline....	obama2terms	Dec 2012	#18
Believe me, for the last 10 years what Bushco calls "fusion camps" have been built to contain unruly	judesedit	Dec 2012	#24
Where are these "fusion camps"?	former9thward	Dec 2012	#60
I'm surprised that so many of you are surprised	AZ Progressive	Dec 2012	#31
That's it, right there.	DollarBillHines	Dec 2012	#36
Yep. And it's even one of the reasons OWS 'chose' not to have LEADERS to begin with.	Amonester	Dec 2012	#37
OWS was following the Egyptian Rebellion	AZ Progressive	Dec 2012	#48
'OWS chose'? That's hilarious.	randome	Dec 2012	#63
What if the people planning the sniper attacks on the "leaders" of Occupy	JDPriestly	Dec 2012	#38
They were trained by the Gov. to kill leaders during Riots, years ago I saw a video	oldbanjo	Dec 2012	#69
Your government loves you.	Taverner	Dec 2012	#40
"Bad writing happens."	Amonester	Dec 2012	#41
Are there still Occupy occupations happening anywhere in the US?	ChisolmTrailDem	Dec 2012	#43
Yes nt	tama	Dec 2012	#52
I am betting the numbers will pick back up in the spring	Marrah_G	Dec 2012	#59
Let's see: "Dallas," "kill the leadership," "sniper rifles"	KansDem	Dec 2012	#49
Come on folks seriously?	former_con	Dec 2012	#53
K&R	woo me with science	Dec 2012	#54
We need a new years revolution.	WHEN CRABS ROAR	Dec 2012	#56
I see something very wrong with this post, no skepticism regarding the document	Coyotl	Dec 2012	#64
It's bullshit.	randome	Dec 2012	#68
Yes the interpretation that this is an FBI doc insterad of a doc of unknown provenience is total BS	Coyotl	Dec 2012	#72
Freedom of information	nadinbrzezinski	Dec 2012	#71

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.