Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
17. Not between private sellers.
Mon Dec 31, 2012, 02:14 AM
Dec 2012
What is the "gun show loophole"?

The Gun Control Act of 1968 requires anyone engaged in the business of selling guns to have a Federal Firearms License (FFL) and keep a record of their sales. However, this law does not cover all gun sellers. If a supplier is selling from his or her private collection and the principal objective is not to make a profit, the seller is not "engaged in the business" and is not required to have a license. Because they are unlicensed, these sellers are not required to keep records of sales and are not required to perform background checks on potential buyers, even those prohibited from purchasing guns by the Gun Control Act. The gun show loophole refers to the fact that prohibited purchasers can avoid required background checks by seeking out these unlicensed sellers at gun shows.


Which states have closed the gun show loophole?

Only six states (California, Colorado, Illinois, New York, Oregon and Rhode Island) require universal background checks on all firearm sales at gun shows, including sales by unlicensed dealers. Three more states (Connecticut, Maryland and Pennsylvania) require background checks on all handgun sales made at gun shows. Eight other states (Hawaii, Iowa, Massachusetts, Michigan, Missouri, New Jersey, Nebraska and North Carolina) require purchasers to obtain a permit and undergo a background check before buying a handgun. 33 states have taken no action whatsoever to close the gun show loophole.

In two states, voters themselves closed the loophole when their legislatures refused to do so. On November 7, 2000, the citizens of Colorado overwhelmingly voted 70% – 30% in favor of Amendment 22, closing the gun show loophole in their state. The referendum followed the tragic shooting at Columbine High School on April 20, 1999 (the guns used in the shooting were purchased from private sellers at Denver gun shows). In Oregon, voters also voted overwhelmingly, 62% – 38%, in favor of Measure 5, effectively closing the gun show loophole in their state.


http://www.csgv.org/issues-and-campaigns/gun-show-loophole/gun-show-loophole-faq

Some states have already closed it, individually. You may live in one of them. Biden is talking federally.
Last night my local nooz [View all] nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 OP
We have to support all these proposals! LibGranny Dec 2012 #1
The chance that anything will get past the Republican Congress or the NRA aproved... Agnosticsherbet Dec 2012 #2
I want a recorded vote nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #4
I will not vote for nor donate money to anyone approved by the NRA... Agnosticsherbet Dec 2012 #7
I am to the same point. nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #8
Me too. LeftTurnOnly Dec 2012 #10
Limiting the size of magazines won't help much if people can buy multiple mags TexasBushwhacker Dec 2012 #3
It does, Loughner was engaged nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #5
And tape them together... NYC_SKP Dec 2012 #6
Too easy to jam the exposed magazines.......n/t Mopar151 Dec 2012 #11
It's a start cowboy. Pauldg47 Dec 2012 #9
Gun Show Loophole? aptal Dec 2012 #12
Private sales nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #13
At just gun shows or in general? aptal Dec 2012 #14
It is called the gun show loophole nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #15
But my point is this has nothing to do with the gun show itself. aptal Dec 2012 #16
Not between private sellers. nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #17
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Last night my local nooz»Reply #17