Reply #14

In the discussion thread: Yes, there should be a gun registry. No, it shouldn't be public. [View all]

Fri Dec 28, 2012, 11:32 AM

bluerum (6,109 posts)

14. Here is another self righteous anti gun position. You must keep your guns safely hidden and locked

away. Meanwhile we are going to publish a list of adresses that identifies the location of all the guns in town.

But i agree. If there is going to be a registry it should be for law enforcement purposes only.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

47 replies	Author	Time	Post
Yes, there should be a gun registry. No, it shouldn't be public. [View all]	DanTex	Dec 2012	OP
Rec because I agree with 50% of this post	slackmaster	Dec 2012	#1
not that the private sector does any better	unblock	Dec 2012	#2
Not necessarily. Tax data, for example, is pretty well confidential.	DanTex	Dec 2012	#4
And passport files.....oops	yellowcanine	Dec 2012	#47
I agree	oddoneout	Dec 2012	#3
I agree as well.	JaneyVee	Dec 2012	#5
I suggest a police type psych test for all before a gun purchase is allowed.	L0oniX	Dec 2012	#6
Is it a violation of privacy to release and publish ...	GodlessBiker	Dec 2012	#7
I don't know. Is that information publicly available?	DanTex	Dec 2012	#8
I couldn't agree with you more.	tradecenter	Dec 2012	#9
How come?	treestar	Dec 2012	#10
See WilliamPitt's post on that subject	slackmaster	Dec 2012	#11
So let the potential attacker know you have the gun	treestar	Dec 2012	#19
The gun is not the issue	slackmaster	Dec 2012	#21
One's address is not "unlisted" if one does something to create a public record.	treestar	Dec 2012	#22
That's a nice rationalization	slackmaster	Dec 2012	#24
Not a rationalization at all	AceWheeler	Dec 2012	#43
The protection order usually will prohibit him from having one too.	shadowrider	Dec 2012	#38
Because it's none of your business, that's why.	MicaelS	Dec 2012	#17
Why? You have possession of something you can use to kill me?	treestar	Dec 2012	#18
"We register cars publicly." - And Rebecca Schaeffer was killed because of available DMV records.	PoliticAverse	Dec 2012	#29
She was killed because a psycho had a gun	treestar	Dec 2012	#46
In Munnesota, cops and other	Jenoch	Dec 2012	#34
So you'd be ok with blanket publishing this info	SpartanDem	Dec 2012	#41
It's already public	treestar	Dec 2012	#45
It isn't the point...	Coyote_Tan	Dec 2012	#26
If a criminal knows you have	Jenoch	Dec 2012	#33
Concur.	byronius	Dec 2012	#12
Agree 100% n/t	lynne	Dec 2012	#13
Here is another self righteous anti gun position. You must keep your guns safely hidden and locked	bluerum	Dec 2012	#14
That's funny. I thought all responsible gun owners did that. You mean there are some	madinmaryland	Dec 2012	#39
Agree 100% California's DMV record are not public, guns should be the same. nationwide	Dems to Win	Dec 2012	#15
the lovely Rebecca Shaeffer	Skittles	Dec 2012	#16
Great idea! nt	ecstatic	Dec 2012	#20
We should have the right to know who is armed in our communities	Hugabear	Dec 2012	#23
There are lots of things I'd like to know about my neighbors...	Coyote_Tan	Dec 2012	#27
I'd certainly like to know which ones are closet Furries, or Abba fans	slackmaster	Dec 2012	#28
What's wrong with ABBA?	sarisataka	Dec 2012	#31
Have you just outed yourself here, sarisataka? Or should I call you "Bjorn?"	slackmaster	Dec 2012	#32
I choose to exercise my 5th Amendment rights...	sarisataka	Dec 2012	#36
I agree n/t	RomneyLies	Dec 2012	#25
It should be public	bowens43	Dec 2012	#30
So how do we get criminals to register their guns?	hack89	Dec 2012	#35
Exactly!	Sadiedog	Dec 2012	#42
Not only private, but it should require a warrant to access.	OneTenthofOnePercent	Dec 2012	#37
Nonsense. I jumped thru MUCH tougher and many more hoops...	99Forever	Dec 2012	#40
And I would support such a law. nt	NutmegYankee	Dec 2012	#44

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.