Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

jody

(26,624 posts)
57. Not "being considered" SCOTUS acknowledge that all rights pre-exist our Constitution and do not
Thu Dec 27, 2012, 01:43 PM
Dec 2012

depend upon it.

Suggest you read UNITED STATES v. CRUIKSHANK ET AL. 92 U.S. 542 (1875)

Majority and minority cited that case in DC v Heller (2008)

In Heller both sides cited PA(1776) & VT(1777) constitutions that declared rights are "natural, inherent, inalienable/unalienable" and "That the people have a right to bear arms for the defence of themselves and the state"

yeah and you should buy a bushmaster with a huge clip kydo Dec 2012 #1
Well, you know ... Denninmi Dec 2012 #3
thats so true kydo Dec 2012 #40
Depends on state law. In California if you were kept in for more than 72 hours, you are ineligible slackmaster Dec 2012 #2
Thanks for participating. Denninmi Dec 2012 #4
Retained in the facility against one's will. slackmaster Dec 2012 #7
Involuntarily detained on a mental health hold. Jackpine Radical Dec 2012 #9
Why do you NEED a gun? NightWatcher Dec 2012 #5
Tacky wall decor? Denninmi Dec 2012 #12
I thought it is Involuntarily Committed HockeyMom Dec 2012 #19
Probably not. But if... Schema Thing Dec 2012 #6
Generally, Bipolar doesn't mean you are mentally incompetent. NutmegYankee Dec 2012 #8
Bipolar I can come with psychotic features. Jackpine Radical Dec 2012 #10
Thank you for that. Denninmi Dec 2012 #18
The way things are now, with the right to arms being considered a constitutionally protected right, jmg257 Dec 2012 #11
There is no mechanism in place for that type of system. Denninmi Dec 2012 #14
Not "being considered" SCOTUS acknowledge that all rights pre-exist our Constitution and do not jody Dec 2012 #57
I'll pass, thanks. I understand the notion of rights secured by the Constitution just fine. jmg257 Dec 2012 #78
I'm content with you recognizing what SCOTUS says is the law & you obey it or suffer the punishment. jody Dec 2012 #79
Fine, but what does all that have to do with the OP? What should he/she be able to do re: arms? nt jmg257 Dec 2012 #80
Perhaps but CO & Wa nullified federal marijuana law. I begin to understand arguments from both sides jody Dec 2012 #87
In Ohio, you could legally do so. riqster Dec 2012 #13
Same in Michigan, and with the federal instant background check. Denninmi Dec 2012 #16
I think with time it's okay to get a gun under those circumstances mythology Dec 2012 #15
Thanks excellent question and jody Dec 2012 #17
Well, I don't want to give away the farm, so to speak, but my opinion on gun control is this: Denninmi Dec 2012 #20
I understand that you are currently seeking treatment for the problems you described in the OP but.. Walk away Dec 2012 #77
I think it would be a good idea to stop starting these threads on DU. nolabear Dec 2012 #21
Thanks, Nolabear. Denninmi Dec 2012 #23
Okay. I respect that. nolabear Dec 2012 #72
The ignorance on display in Meta was that it was only one poster who held ignorant views riderinthestorm Dec 2012 #24
Taking it personally? Perish the thought. Denninmi Dec 2012 #27
Sometimes it only takes one person to start the ball rolling on change.... riderinthestorm Dec 2012 #33
riderinthestorm Ignorance is a curable disease, stupidity is a terminal illness. Those who insult and jody Dec 2012 #28
Agreed. I don't think people thought they were insulting. A "national database" of mentally ill riderinthestorm Dec 2012 #39
Not just NRA, Mayor Menino of Boston and Mayor Bloomberg of New York City, cochairmen of Mayors jody Dec 2012 #54
Yes, a continuation of "Adam Lanza MUST have been mentally ill!!!11111" thinking riderinthestorm Dec 2012 #67
Emanuel "You never want a serious crisis to go to waste." Repubs lost with Poindexter's IAO and now jody Dec 2012 #68
nolabear good analysis. Laughable that people who call themselves progressive are so intolerant. nt jody Dec 2012 #26
No and No Resonance_Chamber Dec 2012 #22
Because? Denninmi Dec 2012 #25
Denninmi see #28. nt jody Dec 2012 #29
Ok then get a gun, I really don't care Resonance_Chamber Dec 2012 #44
"I really don't care" Then why are you here? nt jody Dec 2012 #55
Got nothing else better to do right now. Any other questions? Resonance_Chamber Dec 2012 #63
That's all goodbye nt jody Dec 2012 #64
Bullshit. You can't possibly make this judgment. You don't have nearly enough info cali Dec 2012 #35
What a load of absolutist dung riqster Dec 2012 #36
yes you are slinging BS, if you are a commerical pilot on anti-depressents you don't fly air planes Resonance_Chamber Dec 2012 #46
Well... LP2K12 Dec 2012 #41
The difference is you know you have seizures and take precautions Resonance_Chamber Dec 2012 #48
No. LP2K12 Dec 2012 #49
Post removed Post removed Dec 2012 #62
Again... LP2K12 Dec 2012 #69
It's cheaper to borrow one from a friend or family member HereSince1628 Dec 2012 #30
It doesn't matter what I think. rrneck Dec 2012 #31
We can't answer that question here and you should know that so cali Dec 2012 #32
No, you should not Marrah_G Dec 2012 #34
Marrah, you don't have the information neccessary to make such a judgment cali Dec 2012 #37
The question is whether mental illness by itself is the criteria to use to make this determination. backscatter712 Dec 2012 #38
Why would you even want to buy a gun? leftyladyfrommo Dec 2012 #42
In the spirit of full disclosure... easttexaslefty Dec 2012 #43
Your diagnosis is something of a red herring, I think, insofar as anyone who wants coalition_unwilling Dec 2012 #45
Anyone wanting to vote must "pass first a rigorous licensing regimen (perhaps with a mental health jody Dec 2012 #59
Hmm, after seeing some of the commentary on Yahoo's boards and other coalition_unwilling Dec 2012 #60
Please add "sheer ignorance and outright delusional thinking right here on DU". nt jody Dec 2012 #61
A bigger concern than a diagnosis like yours Voice for Peace Dec 2012 #47
People confuse mental illness with psychosis. Odin2005 Dec 2012 #50
I feel compelled to add this. easttexaslefty Dec 2012 #51
Sure. Just don't by any ammo. TheCowsCameHome Dec 2012 #52
I have a conflict. no_hypocrisy Dec 2012 #53
If your psychiatrist says it's okay. Barack_America Dec 2012 #56
I wouldn't if I were you. NCTraveler Dec 2012 #58
Wow, great post... OneMoreDemocrat Dec 2012 #65
Probably should not. jp76 Dec 2012 #66
Every case is different, every patient is an individual. Glaug-Eldare Dec 2012 #70
Actually my dear Denninmi the real question is... Drew Richards Dec 2012 #71
If a friend with PTSD or depression were to ask me that question, my suggestion would be "no". lumberjack_jeff Dec 2012 #73
The NRA say more guns = good, and we certainly have to keep up with the Jonses Fire Walk With Me Dec 2012 #74
I am ADHD WilmywoodNCparalegal Dec 2012 #75
Laws concerning firearms and the mentally ill... PoliticAverse Dec 2012 #76
A vet with PTSD (I think went to the clinic I did) arrested today for shooting police officer HereSince1628 Dec 2012 #81
Something nobody is discussing here HockeyMom Dec 2012 #82
See reply #81 n/t HereSince1628 Dec 2012 #83
Where I used to work HockeyMom Dec 2012 #89
No Kalidurga Dec 2012 #84
If you have not been adjudicated a danger to yourself or others, it is your right. X_Digger Dec 2012 #85
Can you? Yes. Should you? Unlike virtually everyone else at DU, I alone lack ... 11 Bravo Dec 2012 #86
Even though I may have stayed at a Holiday Inn Express, I am still in no position to evaluate you madinmaryland Dec 2012 #88
I don't know what your rights are, but no, you shouldn't buy a gun. Th1onein Dec 2012 #90
OK, I wanted to wrap this up. Denninmi Dec 2012 #91
Peace Denninmi :) Fire Walk With Me Dec 2012 #92
Thanks, same to you. Denninmi Dec 2012 #93
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I'm bipolar (or possibly ...»Reply #57