Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

former_con

(47 posts)
17. No not really Robin Hood
Wed Dec 26, 2012, 10:42 PM
Dec 2012

You notice I only include that on the richest of the rich because the point is if they can pay a tax attorney 100K or more to find them ways to avoid paying more in taxes then they absolutely have too much money in the first place.... By attaching a wealth tax to them i.e. the IRS does a wealth assesment and collects say 1 percent on all real asset value over $10 million effectively a confiscation of a small portion of their weatlh. So for example, a Billionaire on paper would have to fork over roughly 10 million per year as an added direct tax simply because their wealth as attributed to the means of using this entire nations inherent value to attain that weatlh i.e., the military protection they received, the local, state police, fire, plus the real estate land assests sitting on the U.S. land which technically in the broadest sense belongs to the community of citizens that are Americans. I think this is fair.

K&R Luminous Animal Dec 2012 #1
Bookmarked for tomorrow. Thanks. nt 99th_Monkey Dec 2012 #2
Please add a Financial Transaction Tax to eliminate the computer driven front running Vincardog Dec 2012 #3
Yes! "Robin Hood Bankers Tax" FailureToCommunicate Dec 2012 #6
Nice vid! 0.05% tax = 100 billion/year. No brainer. grahamhgreen Dec 2012 #11
Capital idea! grahamhgreen Dec 2012 #9
I am all for that Whoopdedoo Dec 2012 #12
Great idea Hassin Bin Sober Dec 2012 #21
K&R Thank you for keeping this issue at the top of the forum. woo me with science Dec 2012 #4
K&R n/t DeSwiss Dec 2012 #5
HUGE K & R !!! WillyT Dec 2012 #7
K&R'd! snot Dec 2012 #8
K&R sarchasm Dec 2012 #10
The math won't work... former_con Dec 2012 #13
Welcome to DU. You are headed in the right (correct) direction FailureToCommunicate Dec 2012 #14
No not really Robin Hood former_con Dec 2012 #17
This is presented as a baseline , grahamhgreen Dec 2012 #16
Yes it is true that would definately pay off the debt former_con Dec 2012 #19
94%? ImaModMan Dec 2012 #27
Because so many fled the country during the 50s abelenkpe Dec 2012 #28
Not arguing ImaModMan Dec 2012 #29
No, see that's the problem I wouldn't abelenkpe Dec 2012 #37
My friend that is a rightwing talking point... former_con Dec 2012 #40
We have to be real about this mostlyconfused Dec 2012 #33
France has already raised rates abelenkpe Dec 2012 #35
LOL I love that it is exactly what woke me up.... former_con Dec 2012 #39
The tax rates in 1942 were 90 percent former_con Dec 2012 #36
Personally, I would say good riddance. 6 Waltons have as much wealth as grahamhgreen Dec 2012 #42
Part of your math is fuzzy too. Lucky Luciano Dec 2012 #43
Of course former_con Dec 2012 #46
One last idea... musical_soul Dec 2012 #15
Well really the argument you will hear... former_con Dec 2012 #18
Six Walmart heirs control as much wealth as the bottom 42% of Americans Fumesucker Dec 2012 #22
+1 a2liberal Dec 2012 #44
You and me both: sabrina 1 Dec 2012 #20
Thank you. Let's fill the boards with save SS threads! grahamhgreen Dec 2012 #23
Why isn't this on DU's front page? MannyGoldstein Dec 2012 #24
Kick! smokey nj Dec 2012 #25
K&R 99Forever Dec 2012 #26
K&R daleanime Dec 2012 #30
K&R! nt Poll_Blind Dec 2012 #31
Follow these guidelines and mix in the ACA and watch the American economy boom! Politicub Dec 2012 #32
Bless you for reposting! Melissa G Dec 2012 #34
k/r limpyhobbler Dec 2012 #38
K&R gringo43 Dec 2012 #41
Love "this stuff." Please keep posting it. JDPriestly Dec 2012 #45
K&R I hope we don't let them get away with this. Egalitarian Thug Dec 2012 #47
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Reminder: Progressives Ha...»Reply #17