Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(67,791 posts)

8. What I see as more likely are shenanigans in their party

Wed Dec 26, 2012, 09:46 PM

Dec 2012

An upstart candidate, abstentions, that sort of thing.

Like maybe the teabaggers revolting and voting for . . . . I dunno . . . . Bachmann.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

They couldn't be that foolish could they? Sekhmets Daughter Dec 2012 #1

It would be so perfect! Sekhmets Daughter Dec 2012 #13

FAIL. Coyotl Dec 2012 #2

or it could even be sabbat hunter Dec 2012 #4

All true. Stinky The Clown Dec 2012 #5

It takes a simple majority of 218 votes RomneyLies Dec 2012 #6

What I see as more likely are shenanigans in their party Stinky The Clown Dec 2012 #8

It is not out of the realm of possibilities. PennsylvaniaMatt Dec 2012 #9

Wouldn't need 34 Republicans. LiberalFighter Dec 2012 #10

You're Right - I just don't see any Republican voting directly FOR Pelosi PennsylvaniaMatt Dec 2012 #12