Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
320. Well, if your gun'owning neighbor has a criminal or mental illness record,
Wed Dec 26, 2012, 02:58 PM
Dec 2012

They wouldn't appear on the list since they can't legally own a gun. So the list is at best a false sense of security.
Second, it's highly likely that some on the list are retired LEO or Judges, who may have a valid reason to keep their address private since an ex-con with a grudge may seek them out for revenge.
Lastly, a victim of domestic abuse probably wouldn't like their ex to have their current address.
Publishing information like this was simply a really bad idea, that was not thought through.

That provides one of the strongest arguments against gun registration slackmaster Dec 2012 #1
Almost everything is public information nowadays. proud2BlibKansan Dec 2012 #2
Public doesn't necessarily mean freely available to anyone who wants it for any reason at any time slackmaster Dec 2012 #3
Public employees salaries are public info. Newspapers started publishing them a couple years ago. proud2BlibKansan Dec 2012 #9
So does that mean the place you worked for was inflating it for book keeping reasons or did the littlemissmartypants Dec 2012 #18
I have no idea. proud2BlibKansan Dec 2012 #21
What you are seeing though nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #96
Yes and it ended with littlemissmartypants Dec 2012 #104
That "slippery slope" some of us talked about when the Patriot Act Jamastiene Dec 2012 #254
Probably the gross, before the S/S, taxes, Medicare, insurance, retirement, etc., were taken out. RC Dec 2012 #89
More like the gross plus 50% proud2BlibKansan Dec 2012 #107
So they exposed themselves as littlemissmartypants Dec 2012 #111
Yep but we don't know who screwed up. proud2BlibKansan Dec 2012 #113
If it's like NY, they're not idiots. bobclark86 Dec 2012 #125
I'm familiar with those figures. proud2BlibKansan Dec 2012 #177
Old information.... WCGreen Dec 2012 #169
The reported number probably Jenoch Dec 2012 #234
Not to mention the criminal aspect of it. Jamastiene Dec 2012 #253
Actually...sadly nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #10
Go to the California DMV and ask for your next-door neighbor's vehicle registrations slackmaster Dec 2012 #11
Oh if a paper wanted to run a similar list nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #26
It would be a major scandal if a newspaper published a DMV registration list here, I believe. slackmaster Dec 2012 #33
And Doug Manchester would care? nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #46
I agree, and I am quite sure the motivation of the publisher of the newspaper who published gun... slackmaster Dec 2012 #52
If Manchester can increase the ever diving nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #56
Circulation spiraling down, paper getting noticeably thinner by the month slackmaster Dec 2012 #59
Hey, it is a dying paper nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #63
that is because of the young actress who was killed dsc Dec 2012 #272
It would be illegal here obamanut2012 Dec 2012 #141
Fred Phelps has some kind of connection that gets him DMV records. proud2BlibKansan Dec 2012 #108
He's a great example of a fucked up person who does fucked up things for attention slackmaster Dec 2012 #114
It's also the same here obamanut2012 Dec 2012 #140
DING! I believe you are correct. slackmaster Dec 2012 #147
"vehicle registrations" dixiegrrrrl Dec 2012 #145
Simple nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #148
Actually... yes- it does mean exactly that. LooseWilly Dec 2012 #17
The legal term "public record" means accessible to scrutiny by the public slackmaster Dec 2012 #20
Do you own a set of encyclopedias? Robb Dec 2012 #36
Do you know anyone who has ever filed for bankruptcy protection, or been tried for a federal crime? slackmaster Dec 2012 #43
Gatekeepers. Like, for example, *newspapers*. Robb Dec 2012 #194
Vehicle registration information is not public record. Deed titles are. LooseWilly Dec 2012 #44
In most states, home sales prices are public record. A few states including Texas are called... slackmaster Dec 2012 #47
Morally Right? LooseWilly Dec 2012 #67
Boy, this is a tough one primavera Dec 2012 #149
A publc figure has a lower expectation of privacy, accorting to the courts. HooptieWagon Dec 2012 #200
Yes, major hypocrisy. Mojorabbit Dec 2012 #285
Also for stalkers... HooptieWagon Dec 2012 #305
what's there too hide samsingh Dec 2012 #210
This: HooptieWagon Dec 2012 #307
i was heartbroken about this - are DMV records still openly available? samsingh Dec 2012 #314
Not anymore in Cali. HooptieWagon Dec 2012 #316
agreed samsingh Dec 2012 #318
It provides an incredibly STRONG argument IN FAVOR of registering ALL GUNS, IMO RomneyLies Dec 2012 #280
Sweet. I found my own neighborhood on the map. Chorophyll Dec 2012 #4
The burglars now know where to look for guns. Rapists and home-invasion robbers also benefit... slackmaster Dec 2012 #6
Of course you assume guns are the only deterent and that without a gun you will be victim. Hoyt Dec 2012 #14
This message was self-deleted by its author slackmaster Dec 2012 #32
Slackmaster, why don't you quit obsessing over being a victim. Crackheads aren't going to check Hoyt Dec 2012 #39
Ha ha! Made you think. slackmaster Dec 2012 #45
It might just be me shadowrider Dec 2012 #48
No, he didn't answer it at all. slackmaster Dec 2012 #55
Hey did you check out that map? proud2BlibKansan Dec 2012 #80
Those are NYS pistol permits only. bobclark86 Dec 2012 #133
Just because a household is not on the list, ywcachieve Dec 2012 #65
So the people who do appear on the map aren't really the ones that people should be worried about. slackmaster Dec 2012 #97
This post is a good one to show that no one should register their guns because a list could get out. oldbanjo Dec 2012 #135
I'll always comply with the law, but laws are made by people that we elect. slackmaster Dec 2012 #157
And I will go out of my way to vote for any candidate with an f or d rating from the NRA nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #165
I will go out of my way to support ANY politician who supports universal gun registration RomneyLies Dec 2012 #282
Very true. Lifelong Protester Dec 2012 #187
Of course you would, the people with guns oldbanjo Dec 2012 #124
Of course they are, just ask Nancy Lanza. ET Awful Dec 2012 #129
Amen! Shadowflash Dec 2012 #34
If the bad guy is armed you are a victim.... oldbanjo Dec 2012 #126
You don't think criminals are smart enough to take that list, pick a few Jamastiene Dec 2012 #256
Price one has to pay for keeping a weapons cache. Hoyt Dec 2012 #262
and that others will pay because more guns are in the hands of criminals arely staircase Dec 2012 #275
Exactly. Jamastiene Dec 2012 #288
Price the public has to pay for a newspaper Jamastiene Dec 2012 #291
My friend, simply saying that those who unreasonably arm up because they are afraid of crime are Hoyt Dec 2012 #299
Yup. I'm extra-scared now. nt Chorophyll Dec 2012 #15
Yeah, cause everyone who has a gun in their house has registered it. blueamy66 Dec 2012 #57
Do you even realize you are coming across as really, really paranoid here? Whovian Dec 2012 #73
Let me just add to my previous comment that I was not surprised IN THE LEAST Chorophyll Dec 2012 #74
I have to agree with you. Fresh_Start Dec 2012 #304
Brilliant!! Public Information... overload LooseWilly Dec 2012 #5
Yup nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #8
Our local media put all of our salaries online. proud2BlibKansan Dec 2012 #12
Yeah, organizations like a school district don't want to work any harder than necessary to comply... LooseWilly Dec 2012 #30
The newspaper is just exercising its first amendment rights Warren Stupidity Dec 2012 #7
I could show you a dozen houses with signs on the lawn tularetom Dec 2012 #13
This message was self-deleted by its author slackmaster Dec 2012 #16
Why did this guy just put up a sign that said "I am an asshole with a gun" nt Walk away Dec 2012 #22
Exactly. Anybody who would put this sign in their yard should add: renie408 Dec 2012 #25
Couple of corrections... pkdu Dec 2012 #37
I would welcome that. renie408 Dec 2012 #23
Or A Sign That Says - "If You Are A Really Good Criminal, Prove It By Duking It Out With My Neighbor" cantbeserious Dec 2012 #35
Why is it that everybody that owns a gun thinks that THEY will be the ones renie408 Dec 2012 #224
Read this... renie408 Dec 2012 #226
Seems to me... littlemissmartypants Dec 2012 #49
By publishing a map of homes that DO have guns, the paper also published a map of homes that do NOT. slackmaster Dec 2012 #62
How do we know they littlemissmartypants Dec 2012 #66
No they didn't proud2BlibKansan Dec 2012 #71
So the people who do appear on the map aren't really the ones that people should be worried about. slackmaster Dec 2012 #91
Not only that but is the map even accurate proud2BlibKansan Dec 2012 #99
I guarantee it is not accurate. All map publishers intentionally "seed" their products with errors. slackmaster Dec 2012 #101
Confession time ... GeorgeGist Dec 2012 #295
I'd see that sign and be thinking "tick...tick...tick" gulliver Dec 2012 #95
He might as well put a sign on his lawn that reads Ikonoklast Dec 2012 #324
I think it is a great public service. Walk away Dec 2012 #19
Another great reason. Hear, hear! Shadowflash Dec 2012 #27
We did the same thing when our kids were young. proud2BlibKansan Dec 2012 #31
Does it bother you to be paranoid? Indydem Dec 2012 #38
All of our children know how to swim and if they are too young to swim.... Walk away Dec 2012 #61
See the story on post 61 nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #68
Alas, the mobile version doesn't show post # Indydem Dec 2012 #92
Read this nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #98
No, paranoia is gun nuts buying up all the guns and ammo they can MessiahRp Dec 2012 #287
Ha ha! Is that honestly the best you have? Indydem Dec 2012 #292
Do a little thinking here. Were gun sales this high under Bush? Under Clinton? No. MessiahRp Dec 2012 #322
This is seriously the best you've got? Indydem Dec 2012 #323
Obama NEVER ran on gun control so you're full of shit. MessiahRp Dec 2012 #332
Makes sense to me Shadowflash Dec 2012 #24
A 90 ROUND CLIP! Indydem Dec 2012 #41
The new shadowrider Dec 2012 #60
I think you have to shoot that from a ladder. Indydem Dec 2012 #87
Drum Electric Monk Dec 2012 #247
Here's seveal different sizes of magazines RomneyLies Dec 2012 #249
The Best Way For The Unarmed To Avoid Being Shot By Gun Owners - Information Is Power cantbeserious Dec 2012 #28
Sunlight is an excellent disinfectant. Robb Dec 2012 #29
Too much sunlight can burn. HooptieWagon Dec 2012 #308
We probably shouldn't license cars then. Robb Dec 2012 #310
Or not not publish owners names and addys in newspapers. HooptieWagon Dec 2012 #321
First they came for the phone books. Robb Dec 2012 #330
Why many people had inlisted numbers, HooptieWagon Dec 2012 #331
And I wonder who will die from this disgusting stunt? cthulu2016 Dec 2012 #40
Self righteous gun haters think even less. Nt Indydem Dec 2012 #42
The 'self righteous gun haters' are getting fed up with the mass shooting by gun lovers. RC Dec 2012 #130
Gun "Lovers" aren't committing these crimes. Indydem Dec 2012 #259
Do you have a list of all the members of the gun culture? How can you make that statement? morningfog Dec 2012 #274
Name me the NRA member, or gun culture member who participated in a mass murder. Indydem Dec 2012 #276
How do you identify the gun culture member? By, like, them possessing guns? morningfog Dec 2012 #277
Wrong. Indydem Dec 2012 #281
The guns you defend are capable of mass murder morningfog Dec 2012 #294
So is a bomb Indydem Dec 2012 #301
The people who performed the disgusting stunt don't give a flying fuck if anyone gets harmed by it slackmaster Dec 2012 #51
Well, since their own personal information was almost immediately counter-leaked... Lizzie Poppet Dec 2012 #217
Well gunowners say that underthematrix Dec 2012 #122
So you're saying houses with guns are not safe? aquart Dec 2012 #131
Most of the commenters on that article seem to know ChisolmTrailDem Dec 2012 #219
That is dangerous for the gun owners. Thieves will target them, to steal their guns. Honeycombe8 Dec 2012 #50
"That is dangerous for the gun owners." Chorophyll Dec 2012 #72
Yes, it's true. Guns are expensive and a common object of theft. Honeycombe8 Dec 2012 #78
Right. But I thought people kept guns so that they could defend themselves from the baddies? Chorophyll Dec 2012 #106
You're misinformed. People keep firearms for a lot of different reasons. slackmaster Dec 2012 #117
I'll let my stereotype go when you stop making comments about rapists and home invasions, Chorophyll Dec 2012 #119
Yes. But there's a difference between protecting against the happenstance that you have an intruder, Honeycombe8 Dec 2012 #260
Ermm... where do you live that X-boxes have to be registered with a public regulatory agency? LooseWilly Dec 2012 #116
Public records. tee-hee. Baitball Blogger Dec 2012 #53
Yes, I'm sure this woman is laughing: HooptieWagon Dec 2012 #309
What public records did he have access to? Baitball Blogger Dec 2012 #311
Driver's license, vehicle registration. HooptieWagon Dec 2012 #315
Such is the case in Florida. Baitball Blogger Dec 2012 #317
Well, if your gun'owning neighbor has a criminal or mental illness record, HooptieWagon Dec 2012 #320
There are ways to address those issues. Baitball Blogger Dec 2012 #326
I just love how most people in this thread care more about the Fawke Em Dec 2012 #54
What about the Fourth Amendment? slackmaster Dec 2012 #58
Dubya did away with the 4th amendment proud2BlibKansan Dec 2012 #77
And DUers are now enthusiastically embracing many of Dubya's policies all over the place slackmaster Dec 2012 #79
Like the first nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #85
Exactly proud2BlibKansan Dec 2012 #110
FREEDOM - of Information Act otohara Dec 2012 #86
No government action, no Fourth Amendment issue. Comrade Grumpy Dec 2012 #156
Government released the information to the press. Government made the law that allowed it... slackmaster Dec 2012 #159
The first amendment doesn't shield the paper from negligence. NutmegYankee Dec 2012 #93
Public information is not private. That is the definition of "Public Record"... LooseWilly Dec 2012 #112
Disagree. NutmegYankee Dec 2012 #167
So you are arguing that requested public information should not be shared with fellow citizens? LooseWilly Dec 2012 #214
I strongly believe this should not have been a public record. NutmegYankee Dec 2012 #221
You strongly believe it shouldn't've been a public record. Fair enough. Agitate to change it... LooseWilly Dec 2012 #233
Excellent post, and well said. billh58 Dec 2012 #297
I'm in favor of making lots of things public information. Comrade_McKenzie Dec 2012 #64
One of my old neighbors is listed on this map. In_The_Wind Dec 2012 #69
And no guns in Newtown proud2BlibKansan Dec 2012 #75
I don't understand how that could be possible. In_The_Wind Dec 2012 #142
I thought this was about two NY counties. PavePusher Dec 2012 #151
I wonder how the DUers cheering this would feel... HooptieWagon Dec 2012 #70
You of course realize nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #76
Of course, legal gun owners are covered by the 2A. HooptieWagon Dec 2012 #139
Gun banners are as fringe as we all get a Glock 9 nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #144
No one has claimed the NRA is mainstream. HooptieWagon Dec 2012 #174
Look, limiting mag size, and 100% background checks nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #181
Extra-capacity mags have no useful purpose for civilians... HooptieWagon Dec 2012 #208
Lets do nothing then nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #261
No one here has suggested that. HooptieWagon Dec 2012 #263
Spoken like a true billh58 Dec 2012 #154
"Then be responsible and accountable for it"... bvar22 Dec 2012 #225
"NRA talking points". There's that incantation again... friendly_iconoclast Dec 2012 #283
Funny, that drunk driving thing... beevul Dec 2012 #279
This message was self-deleted by its author slackmaster Dec 2012 #83
Yeah. There are no principles, only aesthetics. JVS Dec 2012 #255
What? billh58 Dec 2012 #127
I've never owned a gun, so I don't have a dog in that fight. HooptieWagon Dec 2012 #153
How many people have billh58 Dec 2012 #271
If you do drive t cars in public at all you have no reasonable expectation of privacy regarding them Bluenorthwest Dec 2012 #298
That wins the ridiculous comparison award for today! Congratulations! Squinch Dec 2012 #143
I wonder how many people this pissed off complained when newspapers published teachers' test scores Starry Messenger Dec 2012 #81
Yep. proud2BlibKansan Dec 2012 #82
That's different slackmaster Dec 2012 #84
Nothing but praise for doing this.... ReRe Dec 2012 #88
Let me give you a little piece of information that you may not have considered. slackmaster Dec 2012 #94
Yeah, yeah, yeah.... ReRe Dec 2012 #230
"Please don't attack me for thinking." PavePusher Dec 2012 #155
Whew! ReRe Dec 2012 #231
So, if owning and carrying a gun is such a wonderful, "patriotic"... 99Forever Dec 2012 #90
It's an invasion of privacy that serves no purpose other than boosting sales of a newspaper slackmaster Dec 2012 #100
Couldn't the same pretty much be said about the gun manufacturers? Sekhmets Daughter Dec 2012 #109
I know for a fact that the neighbors on all four sides of me have firearms in their homes slackmaster Dec 2012 #115
Good. Sekhmets Daughter Dec 2012 #164
Again- public information is *NOT* private... there is no expectation of privacy LooseWilly Dec 2012 #121
That you are armed and dangerous... 99Forever Dec 2012 #128
Because it's probably inaccurate info proud2BlibKansan Dec 2012 #123
You are starting to look rather foolish. PavePusher Dec 2012 #158
Yet they list gun owners in CT proud2BlibKansan Dec 2012 #172
The article doesn't explain those dots in CT. PavePusher Dec 2012 #192
Did you ever consider that billh58 Dec 2012 #186
For the same reason they billh58 Dec 2012 #182
Next up? A list of those DENIED a permit??? HereSince1628 Dec 2012 #102
That would actually be more useful for people looking for lists of neighbors to avoid slackmaster Dec 2012 #103
I wouldn't make a bet on that. HereSince1628 Dec 2012 #105
Actually, that list billh58 Dec 2012 #134
The list exists, the question is how and when it will become public information. HereSince1628 Dec 2012 #138
It's a great guide for parents. Where NOT to let your kid play. mainer Dec 2012 #118
so it shifts burglars to homes without guns HereSince1628 Dec 2012 #120
Not really. The reality is, not many criminals are overly bright. RC Dec 2012 #152
Here's a list of the tems stolen by burglars nationwide... slackmaster Dec 2012 #166
I bet it sold some papers. gollygee Dec 2012 #132
So they publish the names of the LAW ABIDING citizens. Are they trying to drive gun ownership 1monster Dec 2012 #136
So it's okay to publish weddings, billh58 Dec 2012 #168
Where I live, the birth announcements are up to the parents. If they want the birth published, 1monster Dec 2012 #216
I submit that the examples you cite billh58 Dec 2012 #220
You have to pay for an obituary in the paper. proud2BlibKansan Dec 2012 #236
Not in all papers. Robb Dec 2012 #239
That's good. proud2BlibKansan Dec 2012 #241
Not where I live. billh58 Dec 2012 #252
100% out of line obamanut2012 Dec 2012 #137
It seems to be a lot like Business Licenses, and such. LooseWilly Dec 2012 #180
I wonder how well this idea would be received.. -..__... Dec 2012 #146
Just curious. . . . Piazza Riforma Dec 2012 #150
I automatically trash all Westboro threads slackmaster Dec 2012 #160
The dumb thing about that is that info is already out there. proud2BlibKansan Dec 2012 #237
I don't support the release of personal information of WBC JVS Dec 2012 #258
Spam deleted by Behind the Aegis (MIR Team) Choptop Dec 2012 #161
Post removed Post removed Dec 2012 #175
Post removed Post removed Dec 2012 #188
Oh, no, you didn't. slackmaster Dec 2012 #190
That newspaper is protecting my right of free association. Concealed Carry MIXES "good" guys/gals patrice Dec 2012 #162
What is truely amazing, on a alledged liberal website.... PavePusher Dec 2012 #163
It's not against "honest, lawful people" it's against circumstances that affect millions directly or patrice Dec 2012 #176
You should read the article, patrice. It has nothing to do with concealed carry permits. slackmaster Dec 2012 #179
Something is not "dishonest" merely because you label it so. PavePusher Dec 2012 #195
Isn't something that refuses to identify what it is, conceals itself, & acts publicly BECAUSE of patrice Dec 2012 #204
Illuminating, isn't it? Lizzie Poppet Dec 2012 #222
Slavery, too, was once lawful. Robb Dec 2012 #229
If you think it valid to equate lawful tools and methods for self-defense to slavery... PavePusher Dec 2012 #240
Slaves were lawful tools. Robb Dec 2012 #242
The newspaper should be sued Dirty Socialist Dec 2012 #170
Public information is not private. LooseWilly Dec 2012 #189
That pretty much shoots down my suggestion Dirty Socialist Dec 2012 #206
As has been pointed out, billh58 Dec 2012 #197
Which is why the counterattack is also legal. Lizzie Poppet Dec 2012 #223
Uhmmm... their business info is also public record- but *NOT* their personal information. LooseWilly Dec 2012 #306
I'm anti-gun, but this seems like it does more harm than good. lexw Dec 2012 #171
All the publisher cares about is that it sells newspapers slackmaster Dec 2012 #184
It's called a First Amendment Remedy. Robb Dec 2012 #203
If I had an assault weapon in the house, I would be tossing it. gulliver Dec 2012 #173
Well said, billh58 Dec 2012 #201
A kid I taught about 20 years ago had a dad who was on parole. proud2BlibKansan Dec 2012 #238
Isn't that just a msm variation of the cartoon below? jody Dec 2012 #178
Which cartoon strongly supports why we ought to ask questions about gun-ownership, because patrice Dec 2012 #196
And anything that acrues power to itself only is FASCISM. nt patrice Dec 2012 #198
I'm just trying to figure out the "why" of it all. The rationale behind it. Buns_of_Fire Dec 2012 #183
The answer is: To sell more newspapers slackmaster Dec 2012 #185
actually what they really care about newblewtoo Dec 2012 #235
It is for the sake of billh58 Dec 2012 #209
Okay, that's a valid reason. I was just wondering about the newspaper's reason. Buns_of_Fire Dec 2012 #232
If guns are so good, why are "we" trying to CONCEAL them? Concealment is the problem. patrice Dec 2012 #191
You should read the article, patrice. It has nothing to do with concealed carry permits. slackmaster Dec 2012 #193
k, got it. It's like saying, TTE, "These people own big diamonds". ABC is trolling this issue :-(((( patrice Dec 2012 #202
I like this idea. As they say, if you see something suspicious report it. Bravo idea graham4anything Dec 2012 #199
How would you feel about a newspaper publishing your health records, tax returns, HooptieWagon Dec 2012 #205
Why protect a WMD? graham4anything Dec 2012 #211
Exactly! Now you know what home you can enter with no problem. Socal31 Dec 2012 #207
People with alarms have stickers outside warning people in bright neon colors outside graham4anything Dec 2012 #212
That just doesn't hold water, sorry. Socal31 Dec 2012 #218
Let's see people's health records published also. HooptieWagon Dec 2012 #213
I'm a very private person, and I don't like the idea of ZombieHorde Dec 2012 #215
I think that's a excellent idea-- my county newspaper did it four years ago.... mike_c Dec 2012 #227
If this is that's going to happen with registration and licensing... Lizzie Poppet Dec 2012 #246
and that matters to anyone at all because? farminator3000 Dec 2012 #228
I wonder what other groups people would like to see receive that treatment. (nt) Posteritatis Dec 2012 #243
I posted upthread that teacher salaries are online now. proud2BlibKansan Dec 2012 #244
Yeah, can't say I'm comfortable with that one Posteritatis Dec 2012 #245
This would be a better country if EVERY gun owner's name and address was publicly published. RomneyLies Dec 2012 #248
I would think that gun owners would WELCOME this. NashvilleLefty Dec 2012 #250
One reason that is a bad idea... Jamastiene Dec 2012 #251
well i guess burglars and other felons can use this arely staircase Dec 2012 #257
And gun-owners less likely to register them. HooptieWagon Dec 2012 #264
Who cares? Spryguy Dec 2012 #265
So endangering a retired LEO or abused woman is just collateral damage? HooptieWagon Dec 2012 #267
Someone who keeps equating the outing of gun ownership billh58 Dec 2012 #269
Do you call Dept of Justice statistics pointless? HooptieWagon Dec 2012 #270
Neither are you, and tell that billh58 Dec 2012 #273
"Fail to recognize"? HooptieWagon Dec 2012 #284
The newspaper was exposed too. Cynicus Emeritus Dec 2012 #312
Karma is a bitch. HooptieWagon Dec 2012 #319
can't wait to see next week's edition arely staircase Dec 2012 #266
Bad for gun owners but also bad for those without guns - lynne Dec 2012 #268
This is where I grew up tabbycat31 Dec 2012 #278
I'm pro-gun regulation, but this just feels wrong to me. Bucky Dec 2012 #286
Its actually dangerous. HooptieWagon Dec 2012 #313
The MSM (and I include 24/7 news and Facebook) Cynicus Emeritus Dec 2012 #333
Why? mzmolly Dec 2012 #289
You wouldn't mind then if I published a list of Brady Campaign members? friendly_iconoclast Dec 2012 #290
Big Difference Spryguy Dec 2012 #293
Public Information is... public. Yes, this list can be acquired by anyone by filling out a form... LooseWilly Dec 2012 #302
All six of them? nt Remmah2 Dec 2012 #329
A serious downside to this...the extreme right. Atman Dec 2012 #296
I was afraid of that. proud2BlibKansan Dec 2012 #300
Ironically... her home address is NOT a Public Record... so this is invasion of privacy LooseWilly Dec 2012 #303
It could have been gotten from tax records, which *are* public (and online in some places) friendly_iconoclast Dec 2012 #328
I thought gun nuts were proud of their home armories? Floyd_Gondolli Dec 2012 #325
WTF?! Here you go burglars....nt Deep13 Dec 2012 #327
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Newspaper Publishes Gun O...»Reply #320