General Discussion

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)

10. No. I assume you are trying to equate gun cultists to police, judges, etc. They aren't though.

Wed Dec 26, 2012, 01:57 PM

Dec 2012

I also don't support printing names of assault weapons owners, public toters, etc., rigth NOW.

However, I would not be opposed to setting a date in the future to allow those anti-societal gun owners (owners of assault type weapons, public toters, etc.) to get rid of such weapons before names are printed, available on-line, etc.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

43 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Should the names and address' of police officers, judges, corrections officers, etc be public record [View all] -..__... Dec 2012 OP

Of course not. Jenoch Dec 2012 #1

Thank you. -..__... Dec 2012 #4

In some states they are. RomneyLies Dec 2012 #2

So are the names of firearms owners... -..__... Dec 2012 #3

When gun registration is a matter of public record, I find your complaints ridiculous RomneyLies Dec 2012 #5

One of those consequnces being... -..__... Dec 2012 #8

It reveals to the public at large which are the most dangerous homes in their neighborhood RomneyLies Dec 2012 #9

Now look who's paranoid... -..__... Dec 2012 #13

I live in a world of fact. RomneyLies Dec 2012 #23

Do you keep your kids away from homes with... Coyote_Tan Dec 2012 #38

There is a HUGE difference between gun owner and gun NUT. PeaceNikki Dec 2012 #25

Car registration is a matter of public record, but here in California the DMV can't release peoples' slackmaster Dec 2012 #14

Laws vary. -..__... Dec 2012 #17

Those facts pretty well torpedo the simplistic assertion by some that "public means public" slackmaster Dec 2012 #19

Which is why Florida does not allow gun registration. spin Dec 2012 #29

Yet another reason to stay away from that fucked up state n/t RomneyLies Dec 2012 #30

You have a right to visit Florida or to avoid it. spin Dec 2012 #36

I'm pretty sure their names are all Public Record, as Public Employees... and their salaries as well LooseWilly Dec 2012 #6

I disagree. djg21 Dec 2012 #41

welcome back. you haven't really posted in here since Trayvon Martin CreekDog Dec 2012 #7

I haven't? -..__... Dec 2012 #11

i'm welcoming you to the rest of DU --outside the Gun group CreekDog Dec 2012 #33

Did you read what he posted? 80% of his recent posts are outside the Gungeon. OneTenthofOnePercent Dec 2012 #40

you mean since December 14th? CreekDog Dec 2012 #43

This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Dec 2012 #15

No he didn't... -..__... Dec 2012 #20

This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Dec 2012 #22

+1,000,000,000,000 n/t RomneyLies Dec 2012 #24

here's the fake Trayvon Martin picture you posted in GD --came from Stormfront CreekDog Dec 2012 #34

Bless your little heart LanternWaste Dec 2012 #39

No. I assume you are trying to equate gun cultists to police, judges, etc. They aren't though. Hoyt Dec 2012 #10

That's not a bad idea (and a reasonable starting point for discussion, too). nt Buns_of_Fire Dec 2012 #35

They are and one has to get it blocked.... Historic NY Dec 2012 #12

This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Dec 2012 #16

I thought the gun nuts would LOOOVE this idea*. Won't that deter 'bad dudes' from taking YOUR shit? PeaceNikki Dec 2012 #18

I'm not always home. ... spin Dec 2012 #31

Yes Capt. Obvious Dec 2012 #21

Do you have a problem with open public records? Ikonoklast Dec 2012 #26

Names, yes, home addresses, no. elleng Dec 2012 #27

Yes. Unless they are ashamed of their records or behaviour. Whovian Dec 2012 #28

Judges are definitely a matter of public record here in Maryland. madinmaryland Dec 2012 #32

I thought gun nuts were proud of their home armories? Floyd_Gondolli Dec 2012 #37

To answer the question , no, but.... musiclawyer Dec 2012 #42