General Discussion

Ter

(4,281 posts)

29. And 10th

Reply to ElbarDee (Reply #18)

Tue Dec 25, 2012, 01:26 PM

Dec 2012

Federal bans of any kind violate the 10th Amendment, and it's times Justices see this.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

56 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Police Wonder If They’ll Need To Confiscate Assault Weapons In Event Of Ban [View all] former-republican Dec 2012 OP

It is not going to happen so why wonder about it? n/t doc03 Dec 2012 #1

Post removed Post removed Dec 2012 #3

I feel Doc03 is just being realistic. ... spin Dec 2012 #7

Thanks that's all I was saying. The Republicans control the House, doc03 Dec 2012 #21

We might disagree over how to handle semi-auto firearms but we both understand reality. (n/t) spin Dec 2012 #38

Violence rwilson32zoom Dec 2012 #14

Link to any mass killings by fork? morningfog Dec 2012 #24

He took the DU holiday special: freshwest Dec 2012 #47

Hmmm,hadn't thought of that!! wendylaroux Dec 2012 #55

Why are they talking about it instead of doing it? realgreen Dec 2012 #2

The second and fourth Amendment gets in the way. nt ElbarDee Dec 2012 #18

And 10th Ter Dec 2012 #29

Ture. nt ElbarDee Dec 2012 #49

Talking rather than doing is standard behavior for people who live in dream worlds slackmaster Dec 2012 #34

Whoa, please. When you say: freshwest Dec 2012 #48

It will never happen! Will not pass house or senate! Bookmark this! The... Logical Dec 2012 #4

Please... Keefer Dec 2012 #5

Looks scary and It can fire lots of bullets , they must be stopped former-republican Dec 2012 #6

Post removed Post removed Dec 2012 #12

Couldn't stay longer? TheCowsCameHome Dec 2012 #19

Legal Definition, if you please? atreides1 Dec 2012 #31

the legal definition WILL BE what ever the legislation makes it to be. Just like last time, but bettyellen Dec 2012 #39

Full definition by federal AWB (per wiki) Angleae Dec 2012 #46

Okay ... spin Dec 2012 #8

Any semi-automatic weapon that... Kaleva Dec 2012 #10

6.8 SPC former-republican Dec 2012 #13

Having a case length of 42.6 mm, it would fall under my defination. Kaleva Dec 2012 #16

Oh the technical definition diversion. NRA debate strategy play book. Warren Stupidity Dec 2012 #33

it's not bossy22 Dec 2012 #42

It still works, evidently - TheCowsCameHome Dec 2012 #50

Please define hunting rifle. nt. OldDem2012 Dec 2012 #35

Most likely there will be a grandfather clause as in the old law bluestateguy Dec 2012 #9

It won't pass with the grandfather clause either. Angleae Dec 2012 #15

Post removed Post removed Dec 2012 #11

See? See? See? TheCowsCameHome Dec 2012 #17

Stop having sex with cows! L0oniX Dec 2012 #22

Buy back programs will get many assault weapons off the street SecularMotion Dec 2012 #20

Only if they offer at least market value. Lizzie Poppet Dec 2012 #25

They usually pay $50 to $100 for a buy back former-republican Dec 2012 #26

Either turn your assault weapon in at a fair price SecularMotion Dec 2012 #32

what's the fair price? bossy22 Dec 2012 #43

Australia beat market prices with its buy back. Robb Dec 2012 #45

Buybacks are unlikely to flush out many ARs or semi version AKs aikoaiko Dec 2012 #28

True, owners of such guns are not as law-abiding or responsible as we have been told. Hoyt Dec 2012 #54

I think with bill boards with the faces of the victims of gun violence where placed across America warrior1 Dec 2012 #23

Here's the Russian La La La La La guy's comment slackmaster Dec 2012 #27

I love this video former-republican Dec 2012 #30

My bet is that one of the compromises of upcoming legislation would include a grandfather clause. backscatter712 Dec 2012 #36

They should be wondering... -..__... Dec 2012 #37

Exactly. Lizzie Poppet Dec 2012 #40

Police Want to Confiscate Guns From People Who Want to Shoot Police farminator3000 Dec 2012 #41

LOL! Confiscate guns? Not. Gonna. Happen. Poll_Blind Dec 2012 #44

I do not think the Oath Keepers will comply riverbendviewgal Dec 2012 #51

1. Very few owners will relinquish their assault weapons even with a voluntary buy-back program. no_hypocrisy Dec 2012 #52

They should worry. Assault weapons owners are not as "law-abiding" as they want us to believe. Hoyt Dec 2012 #53

did they last time? farminator3000 Dec 2012 #56