Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
6. Sure you can (the NRA building, at least). They have a public shooting range.
Mon Dec 24, 2012, 04:17 PM
Dec 2012

Now with free WiFi, apparently.

The Capitol is a gun-free zone for non-LEO's. Unlike most gun-free zones, they have armed guards and a metal detector.

The most recent mass shooting in the US Capitol was 1998.

It *can*, it just hasn't yet Recursion Dec 2012 #1
You can't walk into the NRA building or Congress with your gun! MightyMopar Dec 2012 #4
Sure you can (the NRA building, at least). They have a public shooting range. Recursion Dec 2012 #6
+1 HiPointDem Dec 2012 #24
Please define extreme gun control. n/t Sekhmets Daughter Dec 2012 #2
Gun control that is transparently hypocritical, that violates the Second Amendment TPaine7 Dec 2012 #66
So you don't think there should be any gun control? Sekhmets Daughter Dec 2012 #75
How does much of Europe, Oceania, Canada live in freedom without the 2nd amendment? MightyMopar Dec 2012 #3
This reads a lot like the Turner Diaries and loads of other paranoid Libertarian drivel. bettyellen Dec 2012 #5
It's true, but it has the wrong tone, so you hope it's ignored and truth is overridden? Ok. nt TPaine7 Dec 2012 #10
It isn't true. JDPriestly Dec 2012 #33
You read the 2nd Amendment the way Scalia reads the rest of the Constitution Bake Dec 2012 #64
Where is this talk of magazines coming from? The antecedent of "it" is clearly the statements TPaine7 Dec 2012 #68
Nice way to call the gun worshipper a racist... realgreen Dec 2012 #29
Maybe, it's an imortant question not just to gun owners but the mentally ill HereSince1628 Dec 2012 #7
So you wrote Obama a letter with links to WorldNetDaily and reason.com and David Kopel? DanTex Dec 2012 #8
Point out the factual errors (like I pointed out your bald-faced personal lie about me) and we can TPaine7 Dec 2012 #9
You haven't even attempted to make a factual argument. DanTex Dec 2012 #11
It's an opinion piece that quotes statements of fact. Look up "fact" then get back to me. TPaine7 Dec 2012 #16
An opinion piece that selectively reports facts and omits others to arrive at right-wing conclusions DanTex Dec 2012 #21
Thanks for your tacit admission that everything I said was true, despite your sourcing diversion nt TPaine7 Dec 2012 #23
LOL. Nice one. DanTex Dec 2012 #27
I love a dose of right wing libertarian none sense in the morning. nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #12
I would say I love tripe from people who substitute labels for reasoning while dodging substance, TPaine7 Dec 2012 #14
Word net daily nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #15
The link is gone, the source is gone, the truth is still there. nt TPaine7 Dec 2012 #20
Your paranoid truth that is nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #22
Why is it that when the subject has anything to do with guns so many people can't seem to TPaine7 Dec 2012 #47
Have fun...the reception nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #48
There is a kernal of truth in this though Mojorabbit Dec 2012 #59
A total ban would only pass after a civil war nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #61
I don't think you comprehended what I was saying Mojorabbit Dec 2012 #62
And those of us living in reality, not the OP incidentally, nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #63
It was part of MY discussion within the thread. I am totally understanding it. Mojorabbit Dec 2012 #65
Why won't you answer any of my questions? Sekhmets Daughter Dec 2012 #45
Because I went to a Christmas event. Is that OK? TPaine7 Dec 2012 #69
Yes! Have a wonderful Christmas. Sekhmets Daughter Dec 2012 #76
Just curious...do you think the mentally ill can preserve their rights HereSince1628 Dec 2012 #18
Just curious nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #25
You could have answered first. But I'll ante up HereSince1628 Dec 2012 #30
You sure realize nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #35
No I don't think you are the NRA. But the mentally ill have a stake, they have rights, too. HereSince1628 Dec 2012 #36
You are talking of the universe nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #39
NO. I AM TRYING TO DRAW ATTENTION to the rights of the vast majority of the mentally ill HereSince1628 Dec 2012 #40
So let me get this straight nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #42
I think you are avoiding, you still haven't answered my question HereSince1628 Dec 2012 #44
I have told you who is not currently allowed nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #46
You seem to disbelieve what the actuarial data about mental illness HereSince1628 Dec 2012 #49
And the numbers who are in the database nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #50
Jeebus...The issue is the push to ADD people to NCIS based on searching med records HereSince1628 Dec 2012 #53
Yes, to add those who rightfully should be nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #55
And you think ANY one with an SSRI script in their records should be added HereSince1628 Dec 2012 #56
That is not what serious people are talking about nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #58
Just because you let fear completely rule your life doesn't mean you have the right DisgustipatedinCA Dec 2012 #13
You have no idea what you're talking about. TPaine7 Dec 2012 #17
Yep, he shits all over DU with this RW Libertarian govt hating extremism. Repulsive. bettyellen Dec 2012 #34
Huh? ibegurpard Dec 2012 #19
yes samsingh Dec 2012 #26
Please read this and then consider more gun control riverbendviewgal Dec 2012 #28
I am interested how this will play out int he midterms Mojorabbit Dec 2012 #60
Wrong question, IMHO. OldEurope Dec 2012 #31
x2. Detailed OP and cited sources are worth reading. AnotherMcIntosh Dec 2012 #32
No, they are not. Ikonoklast Dec 2012 #57
Tl;dr exists for a reason. Warren Stupidity Dec 2012 #77
This is nonsensical drivel Spider Jerusalem Dec 2012 #37
I agree. Post 37 was nonsensical drivel. TPaine7 Dec 2012 #70
Wrong and wrong Spider Jerusalem Dec 2012 #71
Yes, your post 71 is wrong. And wrong. TPaine7 Dec 2012 #73
Still wrong Spider Jerusalem Dec 2012 #74
First of all your thread title and whole premise for this thread is bullshit, as has been pointed madinmaryland Dec 2012 #38
Yes. This has been another edition of simple answers for simpleton questions. nt Pholus Dec 2012 #41
What a monstrosity of special pleading, straw men and false equivalence intaglio Dec 2012 #43
Oh wait, you were serious. Let me laugh even harder. Prometheus_unbound Dec 2012 #51
Can mass slaughter coexist KT2000 Dec 2012 #52
OMG -- are you serious?! Guns have seriously warped you - please get help. MotherPetrie Dec 2012 #54
Was this your thesis at Glenn Beck U.? WinkyDink Dec 2012 #67
Oh goody. 99Forever Dec 2012 #72
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Can Extreme Gun Control C...»Reply #6