General Discussion

pipoman

(16,038 posts)

12. Yes it would start out voluntary..

Mon Dec 24, 2012, 12:45 AM

Dec 2012

I believe one of the reasons most states don't have a requirement for background checks is because, as it is now, they would have to fund the system somehow. There isn't a mechanism for this to be easily accomplished without a lot of expense at the state level. If the system was in place and could be implemented by the state without cost, more states may require it.

Second paragraph..correct

Third..This is an answer to the complex question of intrastate private gun sales. Every real or perceived problem would require it's own discussion IMO.

I don't believe it will stop any event necessarily. If it does, we'll never know it, huh? I don't believe it is possible to limit the rights of people who have been convicted of nothing...maybe a felon could be prohibited from living in a home with a gun...again a whole other discussion with it's own nuances.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

39 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The "Gun Show Loophole" solution? [View all] pipoman Dec 2012 OP

Solution: Spryguy Dec 2012 #1

That's what OP proposed. nt jody Dec 2012 #2

Not quite. Spryguy Dec 2012 #4

Can't (Constitutionally) be regulated at the intrastate level...now what? pipoman Dec 2012 #5

"I believe that if the licensing requirements for FFLs were amended to require every FFL dealer to jody Dec 2012 #8

You make an excellent point. NashvilleLefty Dec 2012 #3

I really believe the gun lobby may agree pipoman Dec 2012 #7

Thank you for your post. LisaLynne Dec 2012 #6

But it would have to be voluntary, right? Squinch Dec 2012 #9

Yes it would start out voluntary.. pipoman Dec 2012 #12

Thanks. I do think this is just the kind of thing that is needed to begin to work on this, and it Squinch Dec 2012 #28

I believe your idea is a sound one. Jenoch Dec 2012 #10

The "it's not the Federal Government's jurisdiction" talking point is simply inaccurate. DanTex Dec 2012 #11

Yes it does..well, regulates, not necessarily prevents.. pipoman Dec 2012 #13

While I like your suggestion and I'm adding it to my list of what my legislators are going to hear Squinch Dec 2012 #29

Thanks... pipoman Dec 2012 #35

How do pawn shops handle the sales? Do licencsed dealers take consignment deals? rwheeler31 Dec 2012 #14

If a pawn shop sells guns pipoman Dec 2012 #15

If you have ever watched Pawn Stars Jenoch Dec 2012 #19

Your idea sounds good to me. (n/t) spin Dec 2012 #16

There would have to be action on a state-by-state level. krispos42 Dec 2012 #17

I believe pipoman Dec 2012 #26

Very smart. Squinch Dec 2012 #30

Even post-Brzonkala, it's not clear to me how the court would rule, particularly... Recursion Dec 2012 #18

It wouldn't be a manditory system unless or until the pipoman Dec 2012 #25

I think initiatives like this would do very well at the ballot box SpartanDem Dec 2012 #20

2 problems Angleae Dec 2012 #21

The first pipoman Dec 2012 #23

I'm glad to see someone providing constructive ideas davidpdx Dec 2012 #22

I and others have floated this and similar ideas before.. pipoman Dec 2012 #24

Used gun sales should be through real "bricks and mortars" stores... Kolesar Dec 2012 #27

that is not what SCOTUS says the commerece clause says dsc Dec 2012 #31

The difference, of coarse, pipoman Dec 2012 #33

Don't disagree. But gun owners can go to FFL right now, most choose to take fistful of cash Hoyt Dec 2012 #32

"Most"...Yeah, most FFLs are not interested in doing inhouse transfers.. pipoman Dec 2012 #34

Good excuse to sell to unknown for cash. That is what irresponsible gun owners do. Hoyt Dec 2012 #36

Some will always prefer to be part of the problem.. pipoman Dec 2012 #37

Dont be so sure... Spryguy Dec 2012 #38

Help yourself..insure nothing happens.. pipoman Dec 2012 #39