Reply #33

In the discussion thread: Gun Owners: We WILL have to BAN some guns [View all]

Response to Taverner (Original post)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 07:35 PM

Logical (8,004 posts)

33. Who is "WE"? The house and senate? Really think that will happen?

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

38 replies	Author	Time	Post
Gun Owners: We WILL have to BAN some guns [View all]	Taverner	Dec 2012	OP
Okay. Which ones do you want to ban	rrneck	Dec 2012	#1
Semi-Auto would be a good start	Taverner	Dec 2012	#2
How many guns is that and what does that leave?	dkf	Dec 2012	#3
Don't know and don't know	Taverner	Dec 2012	#4
That would cut the number of guns in private hands in half, roughly	Recursion	Dec 2012	#29
A revolver can be fired faster than 1 round per second.	justanidea	Dec 2012	#5
Sounds good to me	Taverner	Dec 2012	#6
Actually, not the case.	Jim Warren	Dec 2012	#14
The murder rate in the 18th century was significantly higher than today	Recursion	Dec 2012	#28
Ain't gonna happen	derby378	Dec 2012	#7
Well it's going to be the easy way or the hard way	Taverner	Dec 2012	#9
No, not all of it.	Lizzie Poppet	Dec 2012	#18
I don't want to ban ANY guns. I want extensive background checks for ALL guns	RomneyLies	Dec 2012	#8
You know, I can go for most of that	derby378	Dec 2012	#10
If all that was done and DONE WELL	Taverner	Dec 2012	#13
I would be okay with the Sheriff having the serial numbers of my firearms on file	derby378	Dec 2012	#16
One person in prison for five years costs the American taxpayers $250,000	Tx4obama	Dec 2012	#15
I thought gun owners love to talk about how "law abiding" they are.	RomneyLies	Dec 2012	#21
A transparent subterfuge	derby378	Dec 2012	#23
"Well regulated"	RomneyLies	Dec 2012	#24
No, what we "need" to do...	99Forever	Dec 2012	#11
Without it, however, you are left with tyranny	Taverner	Dec 2012	#12
I don't understand what that is supposed to mean...	99Forever	Dec 2012	#17
If you do not compromise, then one party gets their way and the other doesn't	Taverner	Dec 2012	#19
Great.	99Forever	Dec 2012	#22
With no compromise, the status quo remains	davidn3600	Dec 2012	#30
Ban new manufacture/sale... or ownership?	OneTenthofOnePercent	Dec 2012	#20
shrug In 1994 we banned assault weapons at extreme political cost	Recursion	Dec 2012	#25
^ban NRA talking points,...	Kolesar	Dec 2012	#26
No. Those are all four accurate statements.	Recursion	Dec 2012	#27
Why SKS and not AK?	ProgressiveProfessor	Dec 2012	#38
Hit that one out of the ballpark	NickB79	Dec 2012	#32
If you need a semi/auto to hunt wild game. . .	DinahMoeHum	Dec 2012	#31
It's a good idea when you're hunting feral pigs	Recursion	Dec 2012	#34
Who is "WE"? The house and senate? Really think that will happen?	Logical	Dec 2012	#33
If current sales mean anything, gun owners seem to believe you.	HereSince1628	Dec 2012	#35
Every single store I've seen is out. 100% out. It's astounding. (nt)	Recursion	Dec 2012	#36
The entire supply chain has been emptied, even seeing it in reloading supplies	ProgressiveProfessor	Dec 2012	#37

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.