General Discussion

farminator3000

(2,117 posts)

33. hee hee

Sat Dec 22, 2012, 02:56 PM

Dec 2012

how about "keeping your fly unzipped being necessary to a well-regulated populace, the right to BARE your johnson shall not be infringed?"

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

69 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

"Smart guns" show promise, but not readily available on U.S. market [View all] farminator3000 Dec 2012 OP

I like that idea a lot. I like the other idea I have been mulling over too. Jamastiene Dec 2012 #1

also a good idea farminator3000 Dec 2012 #18

We've come to a pretty pass when we're talking about machinery to keep us from CTyankee Dec 2012 #22

not the NRA? farminator3000 Dec 2012 #38

I suppose if one lives in a dystopian world, this seems reasonable. CTyankee Dec 2012 #40

do you have a question? or a statement? farminator3000 Dec 2012 #44

I see the absurdity in a society that feels it necessary to do this to restrain its lunatics. CTyankee Dec 2012 #46

it's absurd that someone made a safe gun? farminator3000 Dec 2012 #50

I am talking about countries where kids don't regularly shoot themselves by accident CTyankee Dec 2012 #53

Now how do you get the looneys to buy that smart gun? shintao Dec 2012 #65

It not nearly as ready as the guy who is going to make money off it claims. ProgressiveProfessor Dec 2012 #2

how could you possibly know that? farminator3000 Dec 2012 #3

Perhaps because I have been tracking it for some time ProgressiveProfessor Dec 2012 #4

Funny... isn't it? -..__... Dec 2012 #8

its easy to post a fox news article from 10 years ago farminator3000 Dec 2012 #14

This message was self-deleted by its author Matt_R Dec 2012 #66

thanks! farminator3000 Dec 2012 #69

How would identifying the user prevent accidents or is there more in the article. Mojorabbit Dec 2012 #23

i said do you have any evidence? farminator3000 Dec 2012 #10

Ou know who else is opposed to them? nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #5

that sounds interesting farminator3000 Dec 2012 #34

I am all for it by the way nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #41

I like this part... -..__... Dec 2012 #6

everything in many cars is computerized farminator3000 Dec 2012 #11

I really like the idea Aerows Dec 2012 #7

the floaters are a problem. farminator3000 Dec 2012 #13

Doesn't sound very practical to me. Honeycombe8 Dec 2012 #9

people wouldn't spend millions of $ studying it if it was not practical farminator3000 Dec 2012 #12

Pets don't have hands. Honeycombe8 Dec 2012 #15

pet monkeys do! farminator3000 Dec 2012 #16

I've read a bit about the hand, when something happened to my hand.... Honeycombe8 Dec 2012 #24

you seem to have missed something i said farminator3000 Dec 2012 #30

There's about 4 inches between my wrist & mid palm. I'm a med ht woman with small hands, size 5 Honeycombe8 Dec 2012 #49

i don't believe you. post a picture with a ruler farminator3000 Dec 2012 #51

People do spend millions in research on things that are not practical Progressive dog Dec 2012 #26

Just like everyone ponying up to disable that seatbelt dinger, eh? Robb Dec 2012 #27

more like cold fusion Progressive dog Dec 2012 #29

i can do that for you farminator3000 Dec 2012 #35

This message was self-deleted by its author Matt_R Dec 2012 #67

that's because research money is intended to make things practical farminator3000 Dec 2012 #31

If you have a fire detector, you paid for that Progressive dog Dec 2012 #61

i actually got my fire detector for free farminator3000 Dec 2012 #63

I like the idea. rrneck Dec 2012 #17

i like the first 13 words farminator3000 Dec 2012 #37

Well, lets have a look. rrneck Dec 2012 #55

i hope you type quickly, because you are overdoing it farminator3000 Dec 2012 #56

You haven't proven me wrong either. rrneck Dec 2012 #57

it is one way- the right way farminator3000 Dec 2012 #59

then again, the ONLY answer is to clasify semiautomatic weapons identically to automatic weapons. RomneyLies Dec 2012 #19

is there really a difference? farminator3000 Dec 2012 #20

This message was self-deleted by its author Matt_R Dec 2012 #68

You have that wrong. Glassunion Dec 2012 #21

righto! farminator3000 Dec 2012 #32

hee hee farminator3000 Dec 2012 #33

The toasters pried themselves from the Colonials' dead hands... backscatter712 Dec 2012 #43

It isn't available because the vast majority of firearms owners don't want it Taitertots Dec 2012 #25

Again, what drivers wanted seatbelts? Robb Dec 2012 #28

did you browse the article? beyond disagreeing with the title? farminator3000 Dec 2012 #36

How about directly from the mouth of the executive director of the VPC in the article Taitertots Dec 2012 #39

try to read better farminator3000 Dec 2012 #42

Basically you just want to ignore anyone who disagrees with what you want to hear from the article. Taitertots Dec 2012 #45

no, you just want to disagree, but you aren't very good at it farminator3000 Dec 2012 #48

You just want to disagree with anyone who isn't telling you what you want to hear Taitertots Dec 2012 #54

you have made some vapor post BS farminator3000 Dec 2012 #60

It would suffer from the same problem as trigger lock regulations. Xithras Dec 2012 #58

Smart guns??? Do they have Android 4.0 built in? Initech Dec 2012 #47

The tobacco industry discovered they could create safer cigarettes. backscatter712 Dec 2012 #52

It'll take longer than expected CJCRANE Dec 2012 #62

right, nobody has a rotary dial phone anymore.. farminator3000 Dec 2012 #64