Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)

23. 1934 Gun Control Act

Reply to former-republican (Reply #21)

Fri Dec 21, 2012, 04:41 PM

Dec 2012

In the current environment it will go nowhere, but it would be a rational part of the solution.

You can own it...and I realize how muck of a PITA it would be.

In the current environment it will go nowhere. In the current environment making extended clips ain't gonna work either.

Full confiscation is fringe, but more guns is the solution should be as fringe.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

37 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

hey s.e. cupp, some guns ARE worse than other guns.... [View all] spanone Dec 2012 OP

It's a fact. earthside Dec 2012 #1

no former-republican Dec 2012 #2

yep. why do you want a semi or automatic weapon? help me here. spanone Dec 2012 #4

Because we shoot them former-republican Dec 2012 #8

really? that's your reason? so you can play with them? spanone Dec 2012 #10

I don't play with them former-republican Dec 2012 #11

the reasons you cited are playing sports. spanone Dec 2012 #13

Not to me , and neither is all the other shooters involved in matches former-republican Dec 2012 #16

games....okay. spanone Dec 2012 #18

That's why gun control will go no where former-republican Dec 2012 #21

1934 Gun Control Act nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #23

I have no problem putting all guns on a form 4 former-republican Dec 2012 #25

good luck, we'll see who 'loses' spanone Dec 2012 #29

"good luck" former-republican Dec 2012 #32

That's exactly it. So they can play with them. RevStPatrick Dec 2012 #15

^^^ This ^^^ +1,000 Agschmid Dec 2012 #27

unfuckingbelievable.... spanone Dec 2012 #30

Change to something else. It's good for society. Hoyt Dec 2012 #36

So how are all guns equally dangerous? rbixby Dec 2012 #5

You don't have to go that far back nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #3

Six rounds a second? letemrot Dec 2012 #14

Yes, 4-6 rounds a second. nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #17

For a semi auto letemrot Dec 2012 #19

At that close range, yes, yes you are nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #20

Ok. You take the semi auto of choice; letemrot Dec 2012 #22

It's not a game nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #24

Post removed Post removed Dec 2012 #26

You are playing a disgusting game nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #28

Really? Cause you and the OP issued the challenge letemrot Dec 2012 #31

Whatever Polly nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #33

my challenge was to ms cupp...thank you..another poster here likes games, talk to him/her spanone Dec 2012 #34

Looks like he isn't welcome for a bit. HangOnKids Dec 2012 #35

If that's supposed to be some sort of fight... Lizzie Poppet Dec 2012 #37

Don't take the sledgehammer to that watermelon! ellisonz Dec 2012 #6

Ok.. Modify ammo to be non lethal letemrot Dec 2012 #7

So we going to stalk each other in the woods letemrot Dec 2012 #12

Certainly she knows how powerful a weapon she needs to drop a little bear cub: bullwinkle428 Dec 2012 #9