General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "Regulate" does NOT mean "take them away" [View all]Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)These license would not be required of law enforcement as long as every department met the required evaluation of those in law enforcement. If the liability is not kept on the weapon then you would be required to give the weapon up and perhaps prison time for failure.
I read on another blog one gun nut said he needed his weapon to prevent being taken over by the government, now just intelligent would one be to think they could win the war with our military, block his owning a rapid fire weapon, not responsible. Also, just who on this site thinks any of those 20 first graders or principle or five teachers was part of a government taking over. If you believe this then another one to lose the privilege of gin ownership.
We could weed out many of the gun nuts with simple questions and perhaps some mental evaluations to get the gin violence curtailed. We regulate speed on the highways and this should be regulated also. The fees for license and training should come from gun owners, it should not be borne by the non gun owners