Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Texas women sue over cavity search. "The officer didn't even change gloves!" (Warning:Very Graphic) [View all]Harmony Blue
(3,978 posts)56. That is a cavity search
Cops don't need to insert their fingers inside clothing if their are not intent on doing that.....
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
120 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Texas women sue over cavity search. "The officer didn't even change gloves!" (Warning:Very Graphic) [View all]
aaaaaa5a
Dec 2012
OP
WHY THE FUCK IS THIS NOT A "Cavity search"? You've said that multiple times with NO explanation.
EOTE
Dec 2012
#35
"One can argue that the level of intrusion is tantamount to a cavity search"
jberryhill
Dec 2012
#19
Very confused by your posts here - HOW DO YOU EXPLAIN THE WOMAN'S ON SCENE COMMENT???
jsmirman
Dec 2012
#49
If the police officer was only searching externalities, why did she put her hand down their pants?
Uncle Joe
Dec 2012
#26
notice - cop didn't search anywhere but private parts - lots of feeling about breast
Liberal_in_LA
Dec 2012
#116
Then when the second lady was being searched, what was her hand doing down there for 12 seconds?
Sivafae
Dec 2012
#86
You can see the second woman flinch when those fingers get were they are going
jberryhill
Dec 2012
#95
You don't know if the officer stuck her fingers up the cavities of the women
Cali_Democrat
Dec 2012
#9
That's not the point. The fact that at minimum its debatable is enough for me. nt
aaaaaa5a
Dec 2012
#11
And it's your amazing dark world powers that allows you to determine that didn't happen?
EOTE
Dec 2012
#84
Probably have put them in stocks in the town square so everyone could have a good
RKP5637
Dec 2012
#104
Ugh. Sounds like something one should have a medical license to do..either one.
libdem4life
Dec 2012
#90
Thank god for the requirement for dash cameras. Progress. We know this crap has been going on
libdem4life
Dec 2012
#113
Prove it WASN'T a cavity search. This is 100 times worse than the "so what is rape" drivel.
libdem4life
Dec 2012
#67
Imagine the husbands, or sons, or daughters or family or neighbors...there is no end
libdem4life
Dec 2012
#94
Because your right to bodily autonomy is second to our right to FIND TEH WEEED
Warren DeMontague
Dec 2012
#109
glad they are suing the troopers directly, glad gloved one has been suspended
Liberal_in_LA
Dec 2012
#115