Friendly forums for passionate Dems!
More than 91 million posts since 2001
Home Latest Greatest Videos Forums Hide ads Join up!
Home Latest Greatest
Videos Forums Help
Hide ads Join up!
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I don't think SS should b...»Reply #20
Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: I don't think SS should be cut at all... HOWEVER [View all]

gkhouston

(21,642 posts)
20. +1000. If the Republicans asked for us to subsidize hookers for them, would that be on the table?
Reply to sabrina 1 (Reply #7)
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 02:42 PM
Dec 2012

btw, what about subsidies for the oil companies?

TopBack to the top of the page AlertAlert this post for a rule violation ShareGet links to this post PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
  EditCannot edit other people's posts RecommendRecommend this post ReplyReply to this post

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.
24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I don't think SS should be cut at all... HOWEVER [View all] berni_mccoy Dec 2012 OP
Just my personal problem with this as I posted elsewhere: Cleita Dec 2012 #1
It will affect me the same as you. RebelOne Dec 2012 #5
You're correct, SS has nothing to do with the defecit and the GOP rustydog Dec 2012 #10
Chained-CPI reduces COLAs by 10%. So in the long-run, SS benefits will be 10% lower. reformist2 Dec 2012 #2
The BLS Calculated 3% over a 10 year period. Where do you get 10% from? berni_mccoy Dec 2012 #3
HERE'S THE MATH. reformist2 Dec 2012 #8
That is Horrible Math. berni_mccoy Dec 2012 #14
Sorry, I meant to say thirty years in both cases. The numbers are correct now. reformist2 Dec 2012 #17
People are up in arms over 0.3%? I know people that have worked 10 years without one raise. nt Comrade_McKenzie Dec 2012 #4
And that is very wrong too. Cleita Dec 2012 #22
SS has nothing to do with the deficit. Nothing. Autumn Dec 2012 #6
I agree, but we should refrain from hyperbole over such a minuscule number. nt Comrade_McKenzie Dec 2012 #9
I don't give a fuck it it turns out to be 10 cents cut from a SS check Autumn Dec 2012 #11
It's not about the deficit. That will be directly returned to SS payments of current workers. berni_mccoy Dec 2012 #15
Social Security should not be a part of these talks Autumn Dec 2012 #18
We don't need lower revenue on paychecks. We need higher paychecks so that the Cleita Dec 2012 #23
Why is SS on the table in discussions about something it had nothing to do with?? sabrina 1 Dec 2012 #7
+1000. If the Republicans asked for us to subsidize hookers for them, would that be on the table? gkhouston Dec 2012 #20
But you know... Bluenorthwest Dec 2012 #12
As I said, I don't think SS should be impacted. berni_mccoy Dec 2012 #16
What ever happened to the littlemissmartypants Dec 2012 #13
this should be in the discussions at all which is why everyone is and should be pissed off No Compromise Dec 2012 #19
If we fold on this, they will keep chipping away until we are back to 1932. Cleita Dec 2012 #21
sorry, that is NOT what I'm reading. cali Dec 2012 #24
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I don't think SS should b...»Reply #20
Home | Latest Discussions | Greatest Discussions | Latest Videos | All Forums

About | Copyright | Privacy | Terms of service | Contact

In Memoriam

© 2001 - 2024 Democratic Underground, LLC. Thank you for visiting.