HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Bearing arms to fend of a... » Reply #12

Reply #12


Response to jody (Reply #11)

Wed Dec 19, 2012, 11:58 AM

12. You're extremely wrong

Steven cited those, but did not find them to be "inherent or inalienable" (and neither do the specific things cited). Stevens only cites them to highlight the omission of a "right to bear arms" absent the purpose of a "well-regulated militia". I'd suggest you bother actually reading the dissents in the case, since you clearly haven't.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 22 replies Author Time Post
DetlefK Dec 2012 OP
Loudly Dec 2012 #1
riqster Dec 2012 #2
KansDem Dec 2012 #3
Bucky Dec 2012 #4
jody Dec 2012 #5
Spider Jerusalem Dec 2012 #8
jody Dec 2012 #9
Spider Jerusalem Dec 2012 #10
jody Dec 2012 #11
LineLineLineLineLineLineReply You're extremely wrong
Spider Jerusalem Dec 2012 #12
jody Dec 2012 #15
Spider Jerusalem Dec 2012 #18
jody Dec 2012 #19
Spider Jerusalem Dec 2012 #20
jody Dec 2012 #22
Marinedem Dec 2012 #6
DetlefK Dec 2012 #7
Xithras Dec 2012 #16
DetlefK Dec 2012 #21
Romulox Dec 2012 #13
Ganja Ninja Dec 2012 #14
cynatnite Dec 2012 #17
Please login to view edit histories.