Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Switching to a Chained CPI for Social Security reduces the general fund deficit by ... [View all]banned from Kos
(4,017 posts)23. There will always be enough Treasuries to buy since SS HAS to buy Treasuries
by force of law and the Treasury must borrow to fund operations. The SS Trust Fund can legally buy nothing else.
And the circular dragon goes on and on since the Treasury MUST issue debt to feed the SS Trust Fund.
Your argument has weakened considerably in the last 15 minutes. Remember that although two sets of books exist consolidation must occur in the end.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Switching to a Chained CPI for Social Security reduces the general fund deficit by ... [View all]
dawg
Dec 2012
OP
Oh that was 24 hours ago. How long do you expect a person to keep their word?
BlueStreak
Dec 2012
#30
Any discussion about Social Security is a distraction. SS may go in the red in 20 years???? Fuck,
rhett o rick
Dec 2012
#9
No. You are wrong. The General Fund pays interest on it's own debts, some of which are owed to the
dawg
Dec 2012
#11
No, the SS Trust Fund earns a coupon (interest) beyond its contributions collected.
banned from Kos
Dec 2012
#14
There will always be enough Treasuries to buy since SS HAS to buy Treasuries
banned from Kos
Dec 2012
#23
If the general fund did not run a deficit, no net new treasuries would ever be issued.
dawg
Dec 2012
#28
Why does ANY deal with the republicans have to contain some form of cutting Social Security??
bluethruandthru
Dec 2012
#19
You're right. That's why I can't figure out why our so-called democratic leaders
bluethruandthru
Dec 2012
#25