HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Bearing arms to fend of a... » Reply #5
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Response to DetlefK (Original post)

Tue Dec 18, 2012, 01:02 PM

5. 2A is about an individual's RKBA for self defense. Congress has all the authority it needs for the

 

militia in Article I, Section 8, clauses 15 & 16.

SCOTUS acknowledged in Heller both opinion and dissent that individuals have a natural, inherent, inalienable/unalienable right to keep and bear arms for self-defense.

The main difference was the opinion said that right was in the Second Amendment and the dissent disagreed but recognized the right in the extract below.

The dissent by recognizing the right but asserting it was not an enumerated right protected by the Second Amendment meant the right was an unenumerated right protected by the Ninth Amendment.

The parallels between the Second Amendment and these state declarations, and the Second Amendment ’s omission of any statement of purpose related to the right to use firearms for hunting or personal self-defense, is especially striking in light of the fact that the Declarations of Rights of Pennsylvania and Vermont did expresslyprotect such civilian uses at the time. Article XIII of Pennsylvania’s 1776 Declaration of Rights announced that “the people have a right to bear arms for the defence of themselves and the state,” 1 Schwartz 266 (emphasis added); §43 of the Declaration assured that “the inhabitants of this state shall have the liberty to fowl and hunt in seasonable times on the lands they hold, and on all other lands therein not inclosed,” id., at 274. And Article XV of the 1777 Vermont Declaration of Rights guaranteed “hat the people have a right to bear arms for the defence of themselves and the State.” Id., at 324 (emphasis added). The contrast between those two declarations and the Second Amendment reinforces the clear statement of purpose announced in the Amendment’s preamble. It confirms that the Framers’ single-minded focus in crafting the constitutional guarantee “to keep and bear arms” was on military uses of firearms, which they viewed in the context of service in state militias.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 22 replies Author Time Post
DetlefK Dec 2012 OP
Loudly Dec 2012 #1
riqster Dec 2012 #2
KansDem Dec 2012 #3
Bucky Dec 2012 #4
LineNew Reply 2A is about an individual's RKBA for self defense. Congress has all the authority it needs for the
jody Dec 2012 #5
Spider Jerusalem Dec 2012 #8
jody Dec 2012 #9
Spider Jerusalem Dec 2012 #10
jody Dec 2012 #11
Spider Jerusalem Dec 2012 #12
jody Dec 2012 #15
Spider Jerusalem Dec 2012 #18
jody Dec 2012 #19
Spider Jerusalem Dec 2012 #20
jody Dec 2012 #22
Marinedem Dec 2012 #6
DetlefK Dec 2012 #7
Xithras Dec 2012 #16
DetlefK Dec 2012 #21
Romulox Dec 2012 #13
Ganja Ninja Dec 2012 #14
cynatnite Dec 2012 #17
Please login to view edit histories.