Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
13. The title would leave the impression that pre-school is a dangerous place, which is wrong.
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 12:37 PM
Dec 2012

Note that the comparison is between gun deaths of pre-schoolers and cops "on-duty".

The correct comparison would be gun deaths of pre-school aged individuals versus cops on and off-duty weighted by populations, e.g. gun deaths annually per 100,000 persons. Otherwise, as noted above, the comparison is pretty meaningless.

Clearly this shows that we need to arm preschoolers Fumesucker Dec 2012 #1
Nice exercise in creative arithmetic slackmaster Dec 2012 #2
How so? Can you be specific? cynatnite Dec 2012 #4
Here's a hint: Are there as many police officers in this country as there are pre-school children? slackmaster Dec 2012 #6
So it's not creative arithmatic... cynatnite Dec 2012 #9
Do you understand the difference between a rate and a raw count? slackmaster Dec 2012 #10
This was not creative arithmatic... cynatnite Dec 2012 #15
Actual numbers, like < 1 mil cops and >60 mil children (under 14) cleanhippie Dec 2012 #20
preschoolers, dude. laundry_queen Dec 2012 #27
Does google not work for you? cleanhippie Dec 2012 #48
Does Google say how ... 99Forever Dec 2012 #53
Hahaha! Now you're moving the goalposts. cleanhippie Dec 2012 #54
Way to shuck and jive. 99Forever Dec 2012 #57
There is no honesty or integrity in the question to begin with. cleanhippie Dec 2012 #60
So you have nothing. 99Forever Dec 2012 #62
Yes, for nothing you get nothing. cleanhippie Dec 2012 #65
This message was self-deleted by its author 99Forever Dec 2012 #67
Damn. I missed your post before you self deleted. cleanhippie Dec 2012 #70
I stop engaging... 99Forever Dec 2012 #71
Ahh, I see. You recognized that all you have left is projection. cleanhippie Dec 2012 #72
Read downthread genius. laundry_queen Dec 2012 #81
I'm not arguing the actual numbers at all... cynatnite Dec 2012 #30
So mr slack... 99Forever Dec 2012 #21
Rates and raw counts of zero would be acceptable to me. slackmaster Dec 2012 #28
Then why are you pimping the NRA talking points? 99Forever Dec 2012 #35
The difference between a statistical rate and a raw count is now an "NRA talking point?" slackmaster Dec 2012 #45
Going to answer the questions or just.. 99Forever Dec 2012 #51
Your questions are insulting, and the math issue is plain as day to anyone who finished sixth grade. slackmaster Dec 2012 #55
Honesty is insulting? 99Forever Dec 2012 #58
No smartguy... 99Forever Dec 2012 #74
Obviously police officers are at much greater risk of getting shot than preschoolers are. slackmaster Dec 2012 #76
Post removed Post removed Dec 2012 #79
You're just wrong, that's why slack didn't answer Bake Dec 2012 #73
Expect To See You Make This Comment, Sir The Magistrate Dec 2012 #36
why do people post stats ProdigalJunkMail Dec 2012 #37
Because they are too proud to admit that they have been caught at a deception, I suppose slackmaster Dec 2012 #46
i am guessing the latter... ProdigalJunkMail Dec 2012 #47
Seems that your "math" pal isn't really interested in... 99Forever Dec 2012 #52
actually, you are the one not interested in apples to apples ProdigalJunkMail Dec 2012 #69
Correct. H2O Man Dec 2012 #64
thank you for stepping in so quickly to protect the reputation of the lowly gun CreekDog Dec 2012 #78
They are almost always killed at home by family members, not at preschool FarCenter Dec 2012 #3
I think the point is that guns kill more children than cops. n/t cynatnite Dec 2012 #5
Yes home is dangerous. Why make it more dangerous with guns? mainer Dec 2012 #7
In 2011 there were 385 homicides of children aged 0 to 4. FarCenter Dec 2012 #11
Yeah, but that "somewhat less than 50%" needn't have happened at all mainer Dec 2012 #16
Your assuming that the perpetrator would not have used other means FarCenter Dec 2012 #42
If that's the case, doesn't it make sense to have better gun control laws to prevent Arkansas Granny Dec 2012 #8
Are you disputing the OP or agreeing with it? I'm having trouble coalition_unwilling Dec 2012 #12
The title would leave the impression that pre-school is a dangerous place, which is wrong. FarCenter Dec 2012 #13
I got you. Absolute numbers of deaths in the respective populations say coalition_unwilling Dec 2012 #17
Totally meaningless stat RZM Dec 2012 #14
So I looked it up laundry_queen Dec 2012 #31
Forget about the naysayers and carpers, this is a powerful statement Fumesucker Dec 2012 #18
Sure, it's powerful if one subscribes to ignorance. cleanhippie Dec 2012 #22
Well, that's about five percent of the population and I think I'm being generous with that Fumesucker Dec 2012 #25
If we have to surrender critical, rational thought and logic to emotion in order to "win" cleanhippie Dec 2012 #49
As I said, that's about five percent of the population that will respond to rational thought Fumesucker Dec 2012 #56
We keep trying. Lowering ourselves to that level is regressive, not progressive. cleanhippie Dec 2012 #59
+1 Lizzie Poppet Dec 2012 #63
Great. So neither side need be taken seriously. cthulu2016 Dec 2012 #23
Politics isn't about facts and logic nearly as much as it is about emotion and tribalism Fumesucker Dec 2012 #26
It's not exaggeration bongbong Dec 2012 #29
Too late Fumesucker Dec 2012 #34
Yep! bongbong Dec 2012 #44
Wow. That's headline is just FALSE. cthulu2016 Dec 2012 #19
I think the disconnect comes in the title of the OP vs. the material the OP cites. The coalition_unwilling Dec 2012 #24
It's orders of magnitude safer to be in a preschool than to be a police officer Recursion Dec 2012 #32
The weight the two categories respective to the relative exposure to danger. Ikonoklast Dec 2012 #38
Amazing bongbong Dec 2012 #33
You know full well the headline doesn't pass statistical muster RZM Dec 2012 #40
Nope bongbong Dec 2012 #43
Hell, Sir, It is More Dangerous To Be a Truck Driver Than A Police Officer.... The Magistrate Dec 2012 #39
Patently false. Lizzie Poppet Dec 2012 #41
It is only 10 times more dangerous to be a cop than a preschooler. Robb Dec 2012 #50
I'd certainly like to see a wider gap, obviously. Lizzie Poppet Dec 2012 #61
This would be a great post if your science wasn't bunk. Do better next time. WastedSaint Dec 2012 #66
no it's not, since there are way more preschoolers than cops. HiPointDem Dec 2012 #68
Math is hard! Logical Dec 2012 #75
I think I see what you did there slackmaster Dec 2012 #77
Statistics failure... there are probably about 10x more preschoolers than cops. OneTenthofOnePercent Dec 2012 #80
How many cops are there vs. how many preschoolers are there in this country? nt Raine Dec 2012 #82
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»It's more dangerous to be...»Reply #13