Reply #34

In the discussion thread: Message to gun owners about your right to bear arms. [View all]

Tue Dec 18, 2012, 01:31 AM

bossy22 (3,192 posts)

34. Where is there a right to privacy?

please give me the amendment number which says you directly says you have a right to privacy?

And you have a reading issue, because if you didn't you would be able to see that i said I DO believe that there is a right to an abortion.

All I'm saying is beware of the arguements you make because they may be used against you. You do not have a monopoly on an idea or a theory. That is what Dershowitz was saying, that if you interpret one amendment significantly different from the other because you don't agree with it, what's stopping someone else from doing the samething to an amendment you do agree with?

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

58 replies	Author	Time	Post
Message to gun owners about your right to bear arms. [View all]	JDPriestly	Dec 2012	OP
You know, if a law clerk was the one who made corporations persons, then we need another law	valerief	Dec 2012	#1
Do any lawyers actually think that the courts would interpret those amendments that way?	Carnage251	Dec 2012	#2
The states are generally considered to be responsible for public safety with their state.	JDPriestly	Dec 2012	#14
actually you have the right to own a musket and make the musket balls in your house	SoonerPride	Dec 2012	#3
and I read the constitution as not protecting abortion	bossy22	Dec 2012	#6
Alan Dershowitz can kiss my ass.	Zoeisright	Dec 2012	#23
Where is there a right to privacy?	bossy22	Dec 2012	#34
Try the Fourth Amendment.	JDPriestly	Dec 2012	#51
My owning a gun and your feelings of safety are mutually exclusive	Egalitariat	Dec 2012	#4
And just how should the government do that?	JDPriestly	Dec 2012	#11
You are the one running around with a deadly weapon. The government	leeroysphitz	Dec 2012	#13
Cars are deadlier, but no one gives a shit. If deadliness were the measure, we'd ban smoking.	Kennah	Dec 2012	#15
We've banned smoking in nearly all public places. Why can't we do the same for guns?	leeroysphitz	Dec 2012	#17
Regulate the sale of cars? Anyone with the cash walks out the door.	Kennah	Dec 2012	#19
Here in Michigan you have to get a dealers liscense if you sell more than a few cars a year.	leeroysphitz	Dec 2012	#40
Regulating private gun sales makes sense, but start talking bans and people resist even that.	Kennah	Dec 2012	#48
In California, you have to prove you have car insurance to register your car.	JDPriestly	Dec 2012	#52
A lie	aandegoons	Dec 2012	#18
Crashes are more survivable today, but punishment for misuse of cars is exceedingly light.	Kennah	Dec 2012	#20
They are only light for the rich.	aandegoons	Dec 2012	#38
That is something which taints many aspects of our society	Kennah	Dec 2012	#47
Not true. Driving without a license gets you into trouble.	JDPriestly	Dec 2012	#53
Hold on there, Bucko. Let us review the regulations and privilege of car ownership and operation	libdem4life	Dec 2012	#24
Absolutly non of that is needed (except the cash/credit part) to purchase/operate	kelly1mm	Dec 2012	#27
I'm from the south and that's appropriate and we had hunting rifles for deer and varmits.	libdem4life	Dec 2012	#28
OK, then any firearm purchased can then stay within the confines of the owner's private property.	Ikonoklast	Dec 2012	#32
I think that is constitutional and I have no problem with that. nt	kelly1mm	Dec 2012	#33
It also seems most problems with firearms stem when they are taken out into public.	Ikonoklast	Dec 2012	#35
Every state is different on cars ...	Kennah	Dec 2012	#37
I believe bi-annual smog checks, getting stopped for faulty headlights, turn signals, etc. qualify	libdem4life	Dec 2012	#46
Smog checks for cars doesn't really translate for guns	Kennah	Dec 2012	#49
It's a mandatory check up to keep your vehicle legal. Without that, you have to park it.	libdem4life	Dec 2012	#50
If people spent several hours every single day shooting their guns, like people drive, it would be a	Flabbergasted	Dec 2012	#26
Really...driving for 20 years vs. unloading a cartridge or two on some kids? Ya think?	libdem4life	Dec 2012	#30
You can't guarantee that. Lawful firearm owners remain so...right up to the moment they aren't.	Ikonoklast	Dec 2012	#22
I have the right to be protected from you	treestar	Dec 2012	#41
Not a gun owner, but I have an idea	lbrtbell	Dec 2012	#5
It can extraordinarily simple to get a gun. Adam Lanza got one from his home...	Flabbergasted	Dec 2012	#29
The imaginary "right" claimed under the 2nd Amendment	Loudly	Dec 2012	#7
The first 4 words of the 2nd Amendment define the SUBJECT of the Amendment.	JoePhilly	Dec 2012	#8
+1000	truebluegreen	Dec 2012	#12
Please describe and identify a "militia" in 2012	libdem4life	Dec 2012	#31
More regulation and limits.	Marrah_G	Dec 2012	#9
I'm a gun owner who has never felt I had a "right" to own guns	Major Nikon	Dec 2012	#10
we have let gun nuts bastardize the 2nd amendment long enough	Skittles	Dec 2012	#16
"Plaintiff A seeks redress from Defendant B on Due Process grounds", said no court ever.	X_Digger	Dec 2012	#21
If the government passes a law supporting gun ownership, the government is playing a role	JDPriestly	Dec 2012	#54
The government grants no rights.	X_Digger	Dec 2012	#57
Tax and regulate the hell out of them. Put the NRA out of business and establish a federal agency.	libdem4life	Dec 2012	#25
establish a federal agency?? you mean like the ATF?? so you think if you have an illegal gun you	crazyjoe	Dec 2012	#44
Yes. A federal department such as the TSA. Regulate as strictly as motor vehicles and dogs.	libdem4life	Dec 2012	#45
It would have to be case by case	former-republican	Dec 2012	#36
Your gun in your home mostly endangers you and your family. In particular, if you have children	JDPriestly	Dec 2012	#55
This morning the first thing I saw when I turned on the early morning news was	Skidmore	Dec 2012	#39
shot guns should be legal, high powered rifles with high capacity clips should be limited to	crazyjoe	Dec 2012	#42
BTW, the supreme court has already ruled on this regarding the gun ban in WashDC. I don't	crazyjoe	Dec 2012	#43
A ban on assault weapons that was upheld would be a good step on the parts of the courts and	JDPriestly	Dec 2012	#56
There was already a much more restrictive assault weapon ban in place in Connecticut	Kennah	Dec 2012	#58

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.