Reply #30

In the discussion thread: Message to gun owners about your right to bear arms. [View all]

Response to Flabbergasted (Reply #26)

Tue Dec 18, 2012, 12:47 AM

libdem4life (1,783 posts)

30. Really...driving for 20 years vs. unloading a cartridge or two on some kids? Ya think?

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

58 replies	Author	Time	Post
Message to gun owners about your right to bear arms. [View all]	JDPriestly	Dec 2012	OP
You know, if a law clerk was the one who made corporations persons, then we need another law	valerief	Dec 2012	#1
Do any lawyers actually think that the courts would interpret those amendments that way?	Carnage251	Dec 2012	#2
The states are generally considered to be responsible for public safety with their state.	JDPriestly	Dec 2012	#14
actually you have the right to own a musket and make the musket balls in your house	SoonerPride	Dec 2012	#3
and I read the constitution as not protecting abortion	bossy22	Dec 2012	#6
Alan Dershowitz can kiss my ass.	Zoeisright	Dec 2012	#23
Where is there a right to privacy?	bossy22	Dec 2012	#34
Try the Fourth Amendment.	JDPriestly	Dec 2012	#51
My owning a gun and your feelings of safety are mutually exclusive	Egalitariat	Dec 2012	#4
And just how should the government do that?	JDPriestly	Dec 2012	#11
You are the one running around with a deadly weapon. The government	leeroysphitz	Dec 2012	#13
Cars are deadlier, but no one gives a shit. If deadliness were the measure, we'd ban smoking.	Kennah	Dec 2012	#15
We've banned smoking in nearly all public places. Why can't we do the same for guns?	leeroysphitz	Dec 2012	#17
Regulate the sale of cars? Anyone with the cash walks out the door.	Kennah	Dec 2012	#19
Here in Michigan you have to get a dealers liscense if you sell more than a few cars a year.	leeroysphitz	Dec 2012	#40
Regulating private gun sales makes sense, but start talking bans and people resist even that.	Kennah	Dec 2012	#48
In California, you have to prove you have car insurance to register your car.	JDPriestly	Dec 2012	#52
A lie	aandegoons	Dec 2012	#18
Crashes are more survivable today, but punishment for misuse of cars is exceedingly light.	Kennah	Dec 2012	#20
They are only light for the rich.	aandegoons	Dec 2012	#38
That is something which taints many aspects of our society	Kennah	Dec 2012	#47
Not true. Driving without a license gets you into trouble.	JDPriestly	Dec 2012	#53
Hold on there, Bucko. Let us review the regulations and privilege of car ownership and operation	libdem4life	Dec 2012	#24
Absolutly non of that is needed (except the cash/credit part) to purchase/operate	kelly1mm	Dec 2012	#27
I'm from the south and that's appropriate and we had hunting rifles for deer and varmits.	libdem4life	Dec 2012	#28
OK, then any firearm purchased can then stay within the confines of the owner's private property.	Ikonoklast	Dec 2012	#32
I think that is constitutional and I have no problem with that. nt	kelly1mm	Dec 2012	#33
It also seems most problems with firearms stem when they are taken out into public.	Ikonoklast	Dec 2012	#35
Every state is different on cars ...	Kennah	Dec 2012	#37
I believe bi-annual smog checks, getting stopped for faulty headlights, turn signals, etc. qualify	libdem4life	Dec 2012	#46
Smog checks for cars doesn't really translate for guns	Kennah	Dec 2012	#49
It's a mandatory check up to keep your vehicle legal. Without that, you have to park it.	libdem4life	Dec 2012	#50
If people spent several hours every single day shooting their guns, like people drive, it would be a	Flabbergasted	Dec 2012	#26
Really...driving for 20 years vs. unloading a cartridge or two on some kids? Ya think?	libdem4life	Dec 2012	#30
You can't guarantee that. Lawful firearm owners remain so...right up to the moment they aren't.	Ikonoklast	Dec 2012	#22
I have the right to be protected from you	treestar	Dec 2012	#41
Not a gun owner, but I have an idea	lbrtbell	Dec 2012	#5
It can extraordinarily simple to get a gun. Adam Lanza got one from his home...	Flabbergasted	Dec 2012	#29
The imaginary "right" claimed under the 2nd Amendment	Loudly	Dec 2012	#7
The first 4 words of the 2nd Amendment define the SUBJECT of the Amendment.	JoePhilly	Dec 2012	#8
+1000	truebluegreen	Dec 2012	#12
Please describe and identify a "militia" in 2012	libdem4life	Dec 2012	#31
More regulation and limits.	Marrah_G	Dec 2012	#9
I'm a gun owner who has never felt I had a "right" to own guns	Major Nikon	Dec 2012	#10
we have let gun nuts bastardize the 2nd amendment long enough	Skittles	Dec 2012	#16
"Plaintiff A seeks redress from Defendant B on Due Process grounds", said no court ever.	X_Digger	Dec 2012	#21
If the government passes a law supporting gun ownership, the government is playing a role	JDPriestly	Dec 2012	#54
The government grants no rights.	X_Digger	Dec 2012	#57
Tax and regulate the hell out of them. Put the NRA out of business and establish a federal agency.	libdem4life	Dec 2012	#25
establish a federal agency?? you mean like the ATF?? so you think if you have an illegal gun you	crazyjoe	Dec 2012	#44
Yes. A federal department such as the TSA. Regulate as strictly as motor vehicles and dogs.	libdem4life	Dec 2012	#45
It would have to be case by case	former-republican	Dec 2012	#36
Your gun in your home mostly endangers you and your family. In particular, if you have children	JDPriestly	Dec 2012	#55
This morning the first thing I saw when I turned on the early morning news was	Skidmore	Dec 2012	#39
shot guns should be legal, high powered rifles with high capacity clips should be limited to	crazyjoe	Dec 2012	#42
BTW, the supreme court has already ruled on this regarding the gun ban in WashDC. I don't	crazyjoe	Dec 2012	#43
A ban on assault weapons that was upheld would be a good step on the parts of the courts and	JDPriestly	Dec 2012	#56
There was already a much more restrictive assault weapon ban in place in Connecticut	Kennah	Dec 2012	#58

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.