Response to Taverner (Original post)
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 11:55 AM
HughBeaumont (20,972 posts)
35. I posted this a while ago regarding this very subject (at least as far as the Kennedys go) . . . .
The Criminal Illuminati Agency wasn't letting ANY highly popular left-leaning Democratic family become a political dynasty.
Giving JFK (who stood up to Steel bosses and the nuclear-war-happy MIC) two terms would have been counterproductive to the Republican/MIC/Corptocracy's long term plans.
An RFK win would have seriously swayed America to, you know, NOT be the "USA USA USA"-chanting, jingo-drugged, fearful, completely-corporate-dependent, easily swayed, accepting of lower and lower standards, obedient nation that it is today.
Conspiratorial? Think about it.
When did American wages start getting suppressed? 1973.
When did energy start becoming an overwhelming concern? the early 70s.
What happened in the 60s that you would never see happen today? People protested against the Republican/MIC folly wars and it got televised. Protests are no more than a belch, a blip on today's entertainment-based "news".
When did the Republican party team up with corporations to institute this permanent plague of power and wealth transfer from the poor to the rich (reciprocated with risk, cost of living and tax burden transfer to the poor)? The 1970s
When did this grand plan get permanently nailed? REAGAN.
Since 1968, there have only been THREE Democratic presidents. And no offense to Carter, but it's not like any of them can really be considered truly "Democratic" in a liberal sense, especially not the last two. Being fully on board with Republican "Trickle Down" & Deregulation bullshitnomics isn't Democratic, it's caving to the needs of the ruling class. These were always "approved" Democrats . . . never even the slightest bit liberal, always moderate to Eisenhower Republican at best.
It's no accident that we're likely never going to have a progressive President.
The only dynasty in this country is, and will always be, BUSH. Whether we like it or not.
We're not meant to ask "what could have been". We're only plagued with accepting "how it's going to be from now on". The Kennedys were never meant to thrive. They had ideas, brains, plans and vision that would have swayed America to become an organized working ideal that government and corporations feared.
Instead, the U.S. since the late 60s set the trend in arch-conservative corporate-based "governance" with a glacial but ubiquitous power-grab and continues stridently to make life as miserable and as "stay-put" to it's obedient, timid and completely dependent wage slaves as possible.
Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
|Lydia Leftcoast||Dec 2012||#7|
|Lydia Leftcoast||Dec 2012||#24|
|The Straight Story||Dec 2012||#12|
|Lydia Leftcoast||Dec 2012||#26|
I posted this a while ago regarding this very subject (at least as far as the Kennedys go) . . . .
Please login to view edit histories.