Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Sex offender Sandusky limited in prison due to safety concerns [View all]Aristus
(66,309 posts)4. Does the guy not know how many cons are fathers?
They don't take kindly to child molesters...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
59 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yes, it would. We are not primitive bent on revenge. The objective of our system is
sabrina 1
Dec 2012
#32
I think you are on the wrong site. Jim Robinson would happily welcome your views to his site. nt
madinmaryland
Dec 2012
#39
Thank you. This is a test of our commitment to the principles we claim to hold dear.
sabrina 1
Dec 2012
#33
If he was released into the general prison population, I wouldn't bet on his life expectancy.
hobbit709
Dec 2012
#8
Ah, but you see, the need to satisfy one's bloodlust knows neither party nor
coalition_unwilling
Dec 2012
#57
I think Sandusky should be given the same consideration he gave his victims
underthematrix
Dec 2012
#51