Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Mangoman

(100 posts)
7. This sounds perfectly rational to me
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 01:03 PM
Dec 2012

If a dog owner is willing to sacrifice their dogs life just because they refused to comply with a few simple regulations , then they shouldn't be dog owners to begin with

What's with people ?

Sikeston MO begins pit bull roundup [View all] The Straight Story Dec 2012 OP
People in Missouri killing living beings based solely on looks? Occulus Dec 2012 #1
Look for a certain newsworthy event in Sikeston, Missouri in 1942. excringency Dec 2012 #11
It's the cotton belt proud2BlibKansan Dec 2012 #28
they can keep the dogs if they comply with regulations Enrique Dec 2012 #2
I'm without words. 99Forever Dec 2012 #3
would you go so far as to comply with the town's regulations Enrique Dec 2012 #4
We hold a private kennel license.. 99Forever Dec 2012 #8
then why would it "get ugly"? Enrique Dec 2012 #9
Are you seeking an argument from me? 99Forever Dec 2012 #15
+100 Myrina Dec 2012 #29
The problem with complying is that they (the city) have no idea what they are enforcing. jackbenimble Dec 2012 #42
" If someone is going to be irresponsible with a pitbull they will be just as irresponsible hedgehog Dec 2012 #48
The "other side to the story" is that many "pit bulls" aren't pits at all Occulus Dec 2012 #14
Exactly PD Turk Dec 2012 #21
As I see it... 99Forever Dec 2012 #22
but that's the crux of the problem PD Turk Dec 2012 #32
That isn't at all what I was saying. 99Forever Dec 2012 #45
This makes me so angry that I CAN NOT formulate a reply that is not angry Drale Dec 2012 #5
I've had several neighbors with many different kinds of dogs madokie Dec 2012 #6
This sounds perfectly rational to me Mangoman Dec 2012 #7
A possible loophole: service dogs KamaAina Dec 2012 #10
Another loophole is to ... Mangoman Dec 2012 #12
That one's not that simple, nor, it seems, terribly effective. KamaAina Dec 2012 #13
she's black Enrique Dec 2012 #16
I had a feeling. KamaAina Dec 2012 #19
Are you implying Mangoman Dec 2012 #27
Well, actually, she's implying that KamaAina Dec 2012 #31
Yay MIRT!!! uppityperson Dec 2015 #58
'pit bull type' dogs PD Turk Dec 2012 #17
I hope there isn't a Target in Sikeston KamaAina Dec 2012 #20
no kidding PD Turk Dec 2012 #26
Good lord. A bull terrier? Recursion Dec 2012 #24
Yeah PD Turk Dec 2012 #36
I feel that Berserker Dec 2012 #40
Pick out the Pitbull kooljerk666 Dec 2012 #52
Less then 7,000 households Marrah_G Dec 2012 #18
Ooh... "pit bull type" dogs... even better (nt) Recursion Dec 2012 #23
More breed specific stupidity. MadHound Dec 2012 #25
this is unconstitutional under the takings clause. nt Deep13 Dec 2012 #30
I thought the Takings Clause Mangoman Dec 2012 #33
Any kind of property without due compensation. nt geek tragedy Dec 2012 #34
No, "property" which can be real or personal. nt Deep13 Dec 2012 #35
See post #37... Lady Freedom Returns Dec 2012 #38
Yep Mangoman Dec 2012 #53
Being from Missouri at one time, this does not surprising. Lady Freedom Returns Dec 2012 #37
You could say the exact same thing about any state in the union. n/t jackbenimble Dec 2012 #43
I just have 33 years experience in Missouri. Lady Freedom Returns Dec 2012 #54
this is disgusting TorchTheWitch Dec 2012 #39
No comment. n/t flvegan Dec 2012 #41
And in related news, Florida wants the pit bulls Bake Dec 2012 #44
Good Taste & funny.............. kooljerk666 Dec 2012 #56
wow! that is drastic. brokechris Dec 2012 #46
Shit Lycanthropy Dec 2012 #47
the city manager of Sikeston MO claims the brokechris Dec 2012 #49
I am very ambivalent on the subject of pit bulls. hedgehog Dec 2012 #50
My town only allows you to have 4 cats lbrtbell Dec 2012 #51
Joplin Mo is somewhat the same. Lady Freedom Returns Dec 2012 #55
Post removed Post removed Dec 2015 #57
SPAM! Agschmid Dec 2015 #59
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Sikeston MO begins pit bu...»Reply #7