Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Should it be against the law for news networks to lie? [View all]nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)85. Yes, and we all know who their medium for this was
And the gray lady did he right thing with miller after the fact. There were some screaming doubts, see Sly Hersh, but overall the media fell inline. There was little questioning, alas that is part of the problem
Going back to my simple local example. We tend to believe government, and when it comes to evacuations you tend to believe fire people. But in matters f war and peace...we all need to question it...starting with the media. This is rarely done.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
186 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I fully agree with you on your "shoulds" but there is a big difference between self-enforced...
slackmaster
Dec 2012
#12
That's a great example. Even assurance of objective truth would not eliminate spin and bias.
slackmaster
Dec 2012
#57
The items in your last paragraph are all perfectly acceptable forms of journalism...
slackmaster
Dec 2012
#77
Unequivocal yes. Alternatively, if that conflicts with the 1st amendment, then
closeupready
Dec 2012
#2
I think there used to be a strongly worded federal statute against lying by the media
left on green only
Dec 2012
#32
That's always the one problem, who is the one with unequivocal truth. Often governments lie
RKP5637
Dec 2012
#94
I really think too that breaking up media conglomerates would be a major step in
RKP5637
Dec 2012
#95
maybe if we somehow made a law that only canadians could enforce this law it might work.
unblock
Dec 2012
#23
first, there's simply no way to legislate out propaganda. the best propaganda involves twisting
unblock
Dec 2012
#48
There is a way. The Canadians have found it. Also, the Brits make a serious and legal
Cleita
Dec 2012
#65
well the broad problems are an excess of corporate influence and wealth concentration
unblock
Dec 2012
#123
I think it's because people who can't properly quote George Santayana are doomed to paraphrase him
slackmaster
Dec 2012
#16
iirc, that "fib" didn't fall under the incitement to riot or libel or other restrictions.
unblock
Dec 2012
#151
lying in advertising induces overvaluation of a product in an effort to pry away money.
unblock
Dec 2012
#67
People generally dislike civil rights when people they don't like benefit from them. (nt)
Posteritatis
Dec 2012
#105
So a "news" station reporting that, say, Iranians killed John Lennon, would just be "free speech"?
WinkyDink
Dec 2012
#164
I think they should be able to lie, but not when they're calling themselves "News"
gollygee
Dec 2012
#28
"Congress Shall Make No Law...abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press"
brooklynite
Dec 2012
#35
I'm amazed at how many DU'ers in this poll are ready to throw that out the window.
TeamPooka
Dec 2012
#179
Where is the separating line between a "gross exaggeration" and a "lie"?
PennsylvaniaMatt
Dec 2012
#68
They have the same First Amendment rights the Hearst propaganda network, the Chandler propaganda...
slackmaster
Dec 2012
#75
If the news programming, advertised as such, is leasing airwaves from the us...
LanternWaste
Dec 2012
#82
yes. it's a great responsibility they bare. they should be held to the highest standard.
spanone
Dec 2012
#100
It seems many of the great Dystopian writers of the Cold War era were right
slackmaster
Dec 2012
#138
Lying propaganda outlets should not be allowed to call themselves "news".
backscatter712
Dec 2012
#124
Free over-the-air broadcasts are riding the people's airwaves and can be lawfully regulated. Cable
TransitJohn
Dec 2012
#125
Criminal Anti-Defamation Laws have been a useful tool for censorship and opression
ThoughtCriminal
Dec 2012
#129
Should the liberal media be prosecuted for spreading all their left-wing anti-American lies?
Douglas Carpenter
Dec 2012
#130
As my 8th grade US History teacher explained, the far left and the far right are indistingushable...
slackmaster
Dec 2012
#137
I'm fascinated and pleased that not one person has voted Undecided in the poll yet
slackmaster
Dec 2012
#140
I have, over the last year, been forced to re-examine my views of the internet left
cthulu2016
Dec 2012
#146
unfortunately, as this poll proves -at best DU is only marginally more gifted with critical thinking
Douglas Carpenter
Dec 2012
#177
Can you imagine all the super pacs Rove & Kochs would fund trying to bring down msnbc?
jillan
Dec 2012
#153
You can already do that, but you have to prove a few things in order to win in court...
slackmaster
Dec 2012
#162
“And yet,to say the truth, reason and love keep little company together nowadays.”
guardian
Dec 2012
#170
"In Pravda there is no news, in Izvestia there is no truth." Used to be a joke.
WinkyDink
Dec 2012
#176
Actually, having government act as the arbiter of truth and of newsworthiness is exactly...
slackmaster
Dec 2012
#178
"Yes" voters - If George Zimmerman wins his lawsuit against MSNBC for their selective editing...
slackmaster
Dec 2012
#185