Reply #45

In the discussion thread: Obama will not veto National Defense Authorization Act [View all]

Response to bhikkhu (Reply #9)

Wed Dec 14, 2011, 09:35 PM

spanone (72,137 posts)

45. it's easier to whiz on Obama than read an article.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

91 replies	Author	Time	Post
Obama will not veto National Defense Authorization Act [View all]	Javaman	Dec 2011	OP
Why don't you trust secret panels	noise	Dec 2011	#1
:rofl:	limpyhobbler	Dec 2011	#6
Well, it will be our freedom loving military doing the deciding who is to be kidnapped.	Tierra_y_Libertad	Dec 2011	#21
How did you know that the secret panels are secret?	MannyGoldstein	Dec 2011	#67
I didn't see the not, this is bad news.	sarcasmo	Dec 2011	#2
There is NO reason to veto it, please see comment #11 :) n/t	Tx4obama	Dec 2011	#12
Tex 4 Obama, please explain.	Mimosa	Dec 2011	#16
Here is Section 1032 - American citizens in The USA are exempt	Tx4obama	Dec 2011	#36
This message was self-deleted by its author	Tx4obama	Dec 2011	#37
It's not clear cut	Aerows	Dec 2011	#40
Here is Section 1031 - which includes the Feinstein amendment language (e) 'bolded'	Tx4obama	Dec 2011	#41
Read that analysis	Aerows	Dec 2011	#44
it says throwing Americans in jail forever is OPTIONAL.	provis99	Dec 2011	#50
Your link timed out. The problems are with section 1031, not 1032, as I understand it.	JDPriestly	Dec 2011	#66
Obama just totally lost my vote	peacebird	Dec 2011	#3
again?	jefferson_dem	Dec 2011	#5
Hubby says he will not vote for him period. I fluctuate between no and he's better than repukes	peacebird	Dec 2011	#91
Why? n/t	bhikkhu	Dec 2011	#8
Another reason to Primary Obama	RC	Dec 2011	#4
Epic Obama FAIL.	Odin2005	Dec 2011	#7
Why?	bhikkhu	Dec 2011	#9
They are ignoring sections 1031 and 1032 which explicitly excludes	AtomicKitten	Dec 2011	#20
Yes you are correct. See comments #36 and #41 for the text of those two sections. n/t	Tx4obama	Dec 2011	#42
There is NOTHING which "explicitly excludes" detaining US Citizens	SaintPete	Dec 2011	#74
Here --	AtomicKitten	Dec 2011	#82
I don't think you read past my subjec line	SaintPete	Dec 2011	#86
I was being ironic.	AtomicKitten	Dec 2011	#88
That's Not Correct!	SaintPete	Dec 2011	#89
No response to post #89?	SaintPete	Dec 2011	#90
it's easier to whiz on Obama than read an article.	spanone	Dec 2011	#45
There is NO reason to veto it, please see comment #11 :) n/t	Tx4obama	Dec 2011	#14
there is NO reason to vote for it..nt	xiamiam	Dec 2011	#51
So, you're against 'the whole DoDA bill'? or just sections 1031 and 1032	Tx4obama	Dec 2011	#53
Really?	green917	Dec 2011	#76
"Don't buy into the hysteria"	savalez	Dec 2011	#10
He's the only one I've heard that people are discussing	Aerows	Dec 2011	#72
He spent another hour on it today.	savalez	Dec 2011	#79
There is NO reason to veto it.	Tx4obama	Dec 2011	#11
You like the idea of the military being able to pick of "suspects" anywhere in the world?	Tierra_y_Libertad	Dec 2011	#19
Oh... so it's ok as long as they aren't US citizens...	SomethingFishy	Dec 2011	#24
That appears to be the defense	noise	Dec 2011	#27
heh, it's very clever wording but still bad	spooked911	Dec 2011	#28
Glad they added (e)	sarcasmo	Dec 2011	#39
Bernie Sanders thinks there is	Aerows	Dec 2011	#73
At least that was fixed.	AverageJoe90	Dec 2011	#83
AP article from today	Aerows	Dec 2011	#13
Yes, apparently the AP is misreporting it. Perhaps they did not read the Feinstein amendment.	Tx4obama	Dec 2011	#29
Are you saying it isn't done without this legislation?	bhikkhu	Dec 2011	#30
And Section 1032 exempts/excludes U.S. citizens that live in The USA.	Tx4obama	Dec 2011	#35
This is horribly written legislation	Aerows	Dec 2011	#47
ding!	FirstLight	Dec 2011	#48
Probably........	AverageJoe90	Dec 2011	#84
ACLU was recommending against it on Dec. 9th	TBF	Dec 2011	#15
The ACLU just released this tonight.	ForgoTheConsequence	Dec 2011	#22
Thank you -	TBF	Dec 2011	#25
Unless congress declares war on the OWS movement, I think we're ok	bhikkhu	Dec 2011	#31
Congress didn't declare war on Japanese-Americans during WWII.	OnyxCollie	Dec 2011	#54
they sure didn't, and they have been preparing for unrest	TBF	Dec 2011	#60
This bill wouldn't have allowed it.	bhikkhu	Dec 2011	#78
Uh, you do know that second-generation Japanese Americans,	OnyxCollie	Dec 2011	#81
Ah, but you need to think	Berlin Expat	Dec 2011	#70
What I see as more likely is that the fear of indefinite detention modifies people's behaviors	bhikkhu	Dec 2011	#80
bingo..nt	xiamiam	Dec 2011	#52
Here's	ProSense	Dec 2011	#17
Is that a flip-flop? Flop-flip? Or, just a SOP politician's lie?	Tierra_y_Libertad	Dec 2011	#18
This is pissing a lot of people off. nt	DocMac	Dec 2011	#23
yeah, because it's outrageous and terrible and un-American	spooked911	Dec 2011	#33
I think the only reason people are pissed is because they have NOT read the bill	Tx4obama	Dec 2011	#43
There are several people who have copied and pasted parts of the bill	Aerows	Dec 2011	#46
I think you're wrong-- I think people are pissed because they see a system way out of control	spooked911	Dec 2011	#57
We are pissed off because we HAVE read the bill, and we know about KBR's contract to build detention	TBF	Dec 2011	#61
Actually, I'm pissed because I HAVE read the bill	SaintPete	Dec 2011	#75
I agree.	DocMac	Dec 2011	#49
Well, to hell with him and every traitor that voted "aye". There should be consequences for	TheKentuckian	Dec 2011	#26
we're into deep deep corruption levels	spooked911	Dec 2011	#34
lindsey graham 'shut up' video	limpyhobbler	Dec 2011	#32
An analysis	Aerows	Dec 2011	#38
thanks-- that was my impression too	spooked911	Dec 2011	#58
Thanks for the link.	AverageJoe90	Dec 2011	#85
He should veto it based on spending alone... nt	Modern_Matthew	Dec 2011	#55
Not what it seems:	caseymoz	Dec 2011	#56
I feel like it's 2006 and deja vu all over again.	Vinca	Dec 2011	#59
Thank you.	TBF	Dec 2011	#62
This is really, really, really, really...	thescreaminghead	Dec 2011	#63
The assholes have the votes to override a veto.	era veteran	Dec 2011	#64
DC "Democrats" stand for NOTHING:	blkmusclmachine	Dec 2011	#65
Shocked! Not....	blackspade	Dec 2011	#68
Huge surprise there	NorthCarolina	Dec 2011	#69
Is this America anymore?	roamer65	Dec 2011	#71
It's As If Obama Is Going Out Of His Way To Lose My Vote.	Paladin	Dec 2011	#77
With 87 votes in place, it would have been a waste of time to even consider it	tjwash	Dec 2011	#87

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.