Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

kelliekat44

(7,759 posts)
16. Is there anyway we (the 98%) can revolt against the media and drown out their propaganda for the RW?
Mon Dec 3, 2012, 10:43 AM
Dec 2012

We need to declare war our media somehow. They are pimping for the GOP night and day except for a selected few. The real media problem is, as is the political problem, local. Local media gets away with telling more lies and half-truths than the national media. We need people in the trenches of local newspapers and editorials. Exposure is the best way to do this but how else do you expose them except to buy ads in the very media we are trying to expose?

Sacrifice Zones.... Junkdrawer Dec 2012 #1
I misinterpreted "GW" at first... Bibliovore Dec 2012 #7
Du rec. Nt xchrom Dec 2012 #2
It should also reveal.. butterfly77 Dec 2012 #3
it heaven05 Dec 2012 #11
Is there anyway we (the 98%) can revolt against the media and drown out their propaganda for the RW? kelliekat44 Dec 2012 #16
The only thing I can think of is too.. butterfly77 Dec 2012 #20
We do have "Democracy Now." dotymed Dec 2012 #23
Good read except that Sandy was hardly minimal stress n/t malaise Dec 2012 #4
I read it as "it would have crumbled under minimal stress, Sandy came and worse is to come." n/t Junkdrawer Dec 2012 #5
I read it the way you did. Sandy, by the record 940 barometric pressure alone, was a Cat 3 storm... OldDem2012 Dec 2012 #8
Stunned. lapislzi Dec 2012 #18
The Weather Channel had a lot of it. starroute Dec 2012 #24
We don't need no stinking infrastructure, we've got billionaires! Egalitarian Thug Dec 2012 #6
When a country's priority is feeding the war machine real people will suffer. think Dec 2012 #9
Hyperbole. How many people died in Katrina? pnwmom Dec 2012 #10
Hyperbole? Could you please point out where Hedges is exaggerating truth2power Dec 2012 #21
He exaggerated the impact by comparing it to Katrina. Very few lives were lost pnwmom Dec 2012 #25
The impact of this storm wasn't even close to the impact of Katrina George II Dec 2012 #12
I don't think that's his point...... marmar Dec 2012 #13
As we keep chasing growth with Drill Baby Drill, Nature keeps erasing our "gains"... Junkdrawer Dec 2012 #15
Then he should make his point better ShadesOfBlue Dec 2012 #19
No, it's not Katrina -- but it's a lot more than"lingering problems" starroute Dec 2012 #27
Bingo! We are all on our own now. Unless you're a 1%er, you are coalition_unwilling Dec 2012 #29
When was it ever not the case? dkf Dec 2012 #30
They need to protect us from phantoms in the ME! Hush up! grahamhgreen Dec 2012 #14
No. It wasn't Katrina again. It was Sandy...nt SidDithers Dec 2012 #17
Another excellent piece by Hedges. blackspade Dec 2012 #22
It always amazes me how people have the unrealistic expectation that Skidmore Dec 2012 #26
It's about the indifference starroute Dec 2012 #28
And add this complaint about Bloomberg actively blocking aid starroute Dec 2012 #34
What is an example of a better response to a disaster like that? dkf Dec 2012 #31
Emphatic K&R! Full article is well worth the read, imho - n/t coalition_unwilling Dec 2012 #32
Hedges, All Over Again allrevvedup Dec 2012 #33
Please also read this, about where the *real* battle is being waged starroute Dec 2012 #35
"Many of the 305,000 houses in New York destroyed by Sandy will never be rebuilt." dixiegrrrrl Dec 2012 #36
They opened some parts of the closed Fort Monmouth to house displaced families -- only 50 takers. FarCenter Dec 2012 #37
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Chris Hedges: Katrina, Al...»Reply #16