Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Obama will not veto National Defense Authorization Act [View all]TheKentuckian
(25,020 posts)26. Well, to hell with him and every traitor that voted "aye". There should be consequences for
violating their oaths of office but since both parties and all three branches are in it over their eyeballs the entire system is well past wrecked and essentially irretrievable.
If this is the kind of leadership the American people wanted, I'm sure Bush/Cheney would have been willing to stay on as Emperor and High Regent or whatever and we could drop the illusion of democracy altogether.
Same direction, less inept, and able to play pied piper to segments that would revolt against Darth and Stupid.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
91 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Well, it will be our freedom loving military doing the deciding who is to be kidnapped.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Dec 2011
#21
Here is Section 1031 - which includes the Feinstein amendment language (e) 'bolded'
Tx4obama
Dec 2011
#41
Your link timed out. The problems are with section 1031, not 1032, as I understand it.
JDPriestly
Dec 2011
#66
Hubby says he will not vote for him period. I fluctuate between no and he's better than repukes
peacebird
Dec 2011
#91
Yes you are correct. See comments #36 and #41 for the text of those two sections. n/t
Tx4obama
Dec 2011
#42
You like the idea of the military being able to pick of "suspects" anywhere in the world?
Tierra_y_Libertad
Dec 2011
#19
Yes, apparently the AP is misreporting it. Perhaps they did not read the Feinstein amendment.
Tx4obama
Dec 2011
#29
What I see as more likely is that the fear of indefinite detention modifies people's behaviors
bhikkhu
Dec 2011
#80
I think the only reason people are pissed is because they have NOT read the bill
Tx4obama
Dec 2011
#43
I think you're wrong-- I think people are pissed because they see a system way out of control
spooked911
Dec 2011
#57
We are pissed off because we HAVE read the bill, and we know about KBR's contract to build detention
TBF
Dec 2011
#61
Well, to hell with him and every traitor that voted "aye". There should be consequences for
TheKentuckian
Dec 2011
#26