Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
Tue Nov 27, 2012, 10:09 PM Nov 2012

Porn stars: NO more damaged than the rest of us [View all]

http://www.salon.com/2012/11/28/study_porn_stars_arent_damaged/

A report finds adult actresses are happier than the rest of us -- and that being naked might lead to self-esteem
BY TRACY CLARK-FLORY

A common stereotype of a female porn star is an insecure, sexually abused, mentally ill and/or drug-addled woman. It’s one supported by anecdotes (most memorably by Linda Lovelace’s harrowing autobiography) and rhetoric (the feminist scholar Catharine MacKinnon went so far as to claim that all porn actresses were sexually abused as children). But as for actual research? Eh, not so much.

Now, a new study claims to have debunked this truism, which is known as the “damaged goods hypothesis.”

Some performers were amused by the news. “As a happy, healthy female porn performer, my reaction is: thanks, science, thanks so much for proving I am real,” says writer and porn performer Lorelei Lee in an email.


Link to actual study http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00224499.2012.719168
211 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Porn stars: NO more damaged than the rest of us [View all] La Lioness Priyanka Nov 2012 OP
. Occulus Nov 2012 #1
Scoot over neverforget Nov 2012 #10
Scoot further over LadyHawkAZ Nov 2012 #11
Hey, make room on the couch! hifiguy Nov 2012 #17
Scoot over! opiate69 Nov 2012 #24
Scrunch up, you guys! nolabear Nov 2012 #29
I brought another sofa with me. Gore1FL Nov 2012 #44
I got some floor cushions. Javaman Nov 2012 #88
Here, I brought more popcorn mn9driver Nov 2012 #45
I brought a friend. UnrepentantLiberal Nov 2012 #54
You guys crack me up... Jeff In Milwaukee Nov 2012 #152
Can we get healthier snacks? Yavin4 Nov 2012 #28
Yuk!! Well... Ok.. But just keep 'em down your end of the couch! opiate69 Nov 2012 #30
Make some room, I've brought humous, babaganoush, falafals and pitta to go with those Turborama Nov 2012 #73
I don't know what we're scooting over for, but that makes me hungry. rainin Nov 2012 #183
HUMMUS!!! Odin2005 Nov 2012 #185
Nice post, Mayor Bloomberg Bucky Nov 2012 #155
Did you bring the bourbon? nt msanthrope Nov 2012 #90
I never leave home without it! ;) opiate69 Nov 2012 #91
For those of us dying for a smoke after such a long session... Turborama Nov 2012 #195
You are my new favoritist person! opiate69 Nov 2012 #196
Hey! Don't bogart the butter! Initech Nov 2012 #110
I know! Aerows Nov 2012 #132
Why is it the spectators always show up first? Duer 157099 Nov 2012 #126
Because... opiate69 Nov 2012 #128
Oh Duer 157099 Nov 2012 #135
lol opiate69 Nov 2012 #141
looks to me like the audience is the performance, seabeyond Nov 2012 #139
lol. that was a good one sea. opiate69 Nov 2012 #142
And the rest of us too! Aerows Nov 2012 #172
Scooch over Aerows Nov 2012 #131
Saw this mentioned by Violet Blue on TinyNibbles the other day. GoneOffShore Nov 2012 #2
LOL La Lioness Priyanka Nov 2012 #3
this is the first data driven article about porn stars La Lioness Priyanka Nov 2012 #4
I find it fascinating since it is an actual study Warpy Nov 2012 #55
yeah, so do i. i find data to be better than stereotypes La Lioness Priyanka Nov 2012 #56
Or "the rest of us" are just as damaged as "porn stars" Cerridwen Nov 2012 #5
all published studies have to have a disclaimer & all research has limits La Lioness Priyanka Nov 2012 #8
This message was self-deleted by its author seaglass Nov 2012 #78
When you study a specific population like this, it is usual convenience sampling La Lioness Priyanka Nov 2012 #79
well, Jenna Jameson is more damaged than us. progressoid Nov 2012 #6
true La Lioness Priyanka Nov 2012 #9
She just wanted to support a pair of even bigger boobs than her own... regnaD kciN Nov 2012 #181
Deranged and deslusional is not the same as damaged. cleanhippie Nov 2012 #47
Being in the 1%, it's somewhat logical for HER, hughee99 Nov 2012 #68
She was gang raped as a teen and her mother died when she was 2 n/t TexasBushwhacker Nov 2012 #71
*Grabs Popcorn* Odin2005 Nov 2012 #7
Interesting, although not surprising. Thanks for posting. n/t LadyHawkAZ Nov 2012 #12
yeah i can't say i was shocked La Lioness Priyanka Nov 2012 #13
interesting RainDog Nov 2012 #19
have you seen the documentary on happiness? La Lioness Priyanka Nov 2012 #43
haven't seen it. thanks! n/t RainDog Nov 2012 #115
Oh, interesting find! Thanks KittyWampus Nov 2012 #140
There is an enormous amount of freedom that goes along with complete Zorra Nov 2012 #14
and it's a relatively well controlled industry La Lioness Priyanka Nov 2012 #15
The moralist brigade isn't going to like this.... SpartanDem Nov 2012 #16
No, they won't. They are convinced nobody would enter porn on their own volition... Taverner Nov 2012 #119
I would've gone into porn if it wasn't for Guy Whitey Corngood Nov 2012 #18
Don't sell yourself short. There's a niche market for everything. Gidney N Cloyd Nov 2012 #23
however, the size of your salary is relative to the size of your.... trailmonkee Nov 2012 #25
... portfolio. n/t jtuck004 Nov 2012 #31
...tracts of land... n/t LadyHawkAZ Nov 2012 #33
Always love an excuse to post Monty Python--- msanthrope Nov 2012 #92
That movie will never get old. n/t LadyHawkAZ Nov 2012 #116
There is no time when the posting of Python hifiguy Nov 2012 #130
Shoe? n/t cherokeeprogressive Nov 2012 #35
Thanks to the internet, I've had the chance to converse with quite a few adult entertainers MrScorpio Nov 2012 #20
+1 Canuckistanian Nov 2012 #21
Wait, do they like a lot of sex or do they like getting paid for it R B Garr Nov 2012 #143
Being naked MNBrewer Nov 2012 #22
being part of the radical faeries is a very freeing experience La Lioness Priyanka Nov 2012 #46
to many mosquitoes! AngryAmish Nov 2012 #89
Not in the WINTER, I hope! Odin2005 Nov 2012 #187
WTF Skittles Nov 2012 #26
LOL La Lioness Priyanka Nov 2012 #36
we turned it off for you temporarily so you could see the World snooper2 Nov 2012 #87
lol La Lioness Priyanka Nov 2012 #103
gawd, I will fucking pass on THAT! Skittles Nov 2012 #144
That is going to torque a few jaws around here. hobbit709 Nov 2012 #27
Because they were in the middle of ... Kennah Nov 2012 #39
OMG - "torque my jaw"! I haven't heard anyone use that phrase (or any variant of) chalky Nov 2012 #113
A survey of 177 porn actors. ismnotwasm Nov 2012 #32
there is no perfect study La Lioness Priyanka Nov 2012 #37
"177 is a pretty good sample size for this" Kennah Nov 2012 #42
This message was self-deleted by its author seaglass Nov 2012 #96
oh, bullshit kwassa Nov 2012 #34
i dont think this study is saying that porn is real sexuality La Lioness Priyanka Nov 2012 #40
Give kwassa a break, thats the first outrage post of this thread so far! cleanhippie Nov 2012 #49
They're all busy in Meta right now n/t LadyHawkAZ Nov 2012 #53
. UnrepentantLiberal Nov 2012 #58
lol obamanut2012 Nov 2012 #108
LOL closeupready Nov 2012 #117
DUzy! Odin2005 Nov 2012 #188
going way out of the way to make a personal attack? kwassa Nov 2012 #65
Going way out of the way to be outraged? cleanhippie Nov 2012 #84
I doubt that, too. kwassa Nov 2012 #67
well if it makes certain people feel better shouldnt we let them have at it loli phabay Nov 2012 #74
? LadyHawkAZ Nov 2012 #50
I am claiming it is one study. kwassa Nov 2012 #157
Well good luck with that line of thought here riderinthestorm Nov 2012 #165
Thank you. kwassa Nov 2012 #176
There probably will be, now that someone's done this one LadyHawkAZ Nov 2012 #170
If there is additional evidence, I will believe it, too. kwassa Nov 2012 #174
So why will you believe it if they do more LadyHawkAZ Nov 2012 #178
No. kwassa Nov 2012 #180
Because I believe in facts too LadyHawkAZ Nov 2012 #191
You do? what you call facts are only your assumptions, based on ...... nothing, really. kwassa Nov 2012 #197
... LadyHawkAZ Nov 2012 #198
and why do you think this study is true? kwassa Nov 2012 #199
I don't LadyHawkAZ Nov 2012 #200
Out of curiosity, what would it take to convince you? Orrex Nov 2012 #51
More studies that replicate the results. kwassa Nov 2012 #159
Terrific answer Orrex Nov 2012 #162
Is that like Monster Raving Looney? AtheistCrusader Nov 2012 #61
lots of people do porn nowadays from all walks of life. not always for money loli phabay Nov 2012 #76
Pics or it didn't happen! Gore1FL Nov 2012 #97
lol not sure you could handle them honey loli phabay Nov 2012 #109
At my age, probably not! n/t Gore1FL Nov 2012 #182
There are those who do it for fun, and those who do it because they are desperate for cash. kwassa Nov 2012 #160
yup it runs the gamit. some for fun some for cash some for desperation loli phabay Nov 2012 #175
DU3 is all about transparency Warren DeMontague Dec 2012 #210
until you get into home made porn like Paris Hilton... snooper2 Nov 2012 #111
The study may or may not be "valid".. sendero Nov 2012 #169
a leap of faith on your part kwassa Nov 2012 #177
I iknow your words.. sendero Nov 2012 #190
Read my words back to me. kwassa Nov 2012 #193
So Look what you're doing here- reflexively insulting these people. Warren DeMontague Dec 2012 #209
No, I'm not. kwassa Dec 2012 #211
So then, we're all fucked Kennah Nov 2012 #38
LOL. La Lioness Priyanka Nov 2012 #41
Or we should be mindwalker_i Nov 2012 #64
I've never worked in porn, but I've been screwed at lots of jobs. Does that count? Orrex Nov 2012 #48
i was wondering what the self esteem and happiness amount La Lioness Priyanka Nov 2012 #59
LOL! Orrex Nov 2012 #70
Do you have a video or pics of it happening? Drale Nov 2012 #104
An enlightening read SariesNightly Nov 2012 #52
welcome La Lioness Priyanka Nov 2012 #57
I just saw this study mentioned on Jezebel tammywammy Nov 2012 #60
Sure, now they are. It's a legitimate career path. MrSlayer Nov 2012 #62
you may have a point there. a well regulated industry, especially with its La Lioness Priyanka Nov 2012 #63
the industry has also changed with the internet with amateur porn everywhere loli phabay Nov 2012 #75
Revelation! Life sucks for everyone! Eyes of the World Nov 2012 #66
i think men and women should both be involved in protecting workers La Lioness Priyanka Nov 2012 #81
very, um, interesting. haha jeanlibny594283 Nov 2012 #69
Seems like a good place for some words from hifiguy Nov 2012 #72
there was another study recently released that said La Lioness Priyanka Nov 2012 #80
I've seen that discussed here and on Andrew Sullivan's site. hifiguy Nov 2012 #114
pretty much La Lioness Priyanka Nov 2012 #145
I think a study should be made on people who like to watch bad acting. trumad Nov 2012 #77
"Hey, What are you do-ink?" "Oh, Oooooooooooooooooooooooooo" FSogol Nov 2012 #82
i think there is actual a lot more data on people who view porn La Lioness Priyanka Nov 2012 #86
Interesting, and suggests that porn is not really "exploitation". Nye Bevan Nov 2012 #83
i think all work can be exploitative La Lioness Priyanka Nov 2012 #85
Bingo. I'd say that the folks who work for minimum wage hifiguy Nov 2012 #112
+1 lumberjack_jeff Nov 2012 #167
It's exploitation if the workers don't own the means of production! Silent3 Nov 2012 #94
I think thats a good moral for many things in like Drale Nov 2012 #105
A small, self-selected sample out of how many professional and amateur internet porn "stars"? riderinthestorm Nov 2012 #93
The methodology report is actually good about listing the limitations of the study Gormy Cuss Nov 2012 #98
Agreed on all points but it hasn't stopped the OP and 95% of poster on this thread from generalizing riderinthestorm Nov 2012 #100
no one industry is fully of happy people. or people with high self esteem La Lioness Priyanka Nov 2012 #102
With all due respect, its hard to extrapolate any hard data from this study. riderinthestorm Nov 2012 #149
a study is not from the left or the right La Lioness Priyanka Nov 2012 #150
I mean presented from left wing or right wing sources. riderinthestorm Nov 2012 #156
yes, this is probably true La Lioness Priyanka Nov 2012 #158
Okay. Whatever. Take the study and run with it.... nt riderinthestorm Nov 2012 #161
i meant that sincerely La Lioness Priyanka Nov 2012 #163
You purport to be a social scientist in real life but are pushing the notion that this single study riderinthestorm Nov 2012 #168
this is very, very limited science. kwassa Nov 2012 #164
it's a lot better than drawing your outcomes from stereotypes La Lioness Priyanka Nov 2012 #166
There is more than that. kwassa Nov 2012 #179
so you are willing to believe the damaged hypothesis La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2012 #204
why do you keep calling women damaged? as if they are only goods. please stop. nt seabeyond Dec 2012 #205
OH MY GOD. can you people read? this study is trying to prove the damaged goods hypothesis La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2012 #206
I'll go out further on the limb and state that one can't extrapolate ANYTHING from this study. Gormy Cuss Nov 2012 #184
Yes well clearly SOME things are DU approved for scientific rigor, and not others nt riderinthestorm Nov 2012 #186
Interesting choice for a subject line, given how incredibly narrow the focus. redqueen Nov 2012 #107
From the link in your sig LadyHawkAZ Nov 2012 #118
Where is my OP stating things in all caps, hm? redqueen Nov 2012 #122
True. Thread titles like "Prostitution is Violence" LadyHawkAZ Nov 2012 #123
My personal opinion about an industry is not analogous to a narrow 'study' posted with a misleading redqueen Nov 2012 #124
That you and others will find some reason to discredit a study LadyHawkAZ Nov 2012 #127
You think the sample size is the problem? redqueen Nov 2012 #129
'my bad for reading what you wrote LadyHawkAZ Nov 2012 #133
It's the Faux Snooze effect. hifiguy Nov 2012 #138
Anyone who submits a scientific study hifiguy Nov 2012 #134
Stating that A is equal to B is NOT an opinion, that's you expressing something as fact. EOTE Nov 2012 #136
the no in all caps was actually a typo, that i didnt bother to correct La Lioness Priyanka Nov 2012 #146
Point taken re: all caps. It seemed since it was in both posts it was intentional. redqueen Nov 2012 #147
"Google experts"... opiate69 Nov 2012 #153
A similar observation, as a new resident of Nevada - WilmywoodNCparalegal Nov 2012 #95
Not buying it x2 vancouverite Nov 2012 #99
Personal myths over scientific evidence, wow that worked before.... Taverner Nov 2012 #120
Well she looks happy Botany Nov 2012 #101
This is a great OP obamanut2012 Nov 2012 #106
Yep Taverner Nov 2012 #121
i wrote another one on research methodology La Lioness Priyanka Nov 2012 #148
OOOOOOO obamanut2012 Nov 2012 #201
After carefully reading this op and all the responses, I am shocked to find there is retread Nov 2012 #125
There's gambling in the back room at Rick's, too! hifiguy Nov 2012 #137
Lol Systemshock212 Nov 2012 #151
Care to elaborate? hifiguy Nov 2012 #171
Uh oh. Some of the agenda pushers won't like that very much bluestateguy Nov 2012 #154
Is this a celebration of porn stars... or an indictment of the rest of our psyches? Bucky Nov 2012 #173
... TeeYiYi Nov 2012 #189
I dunno this is like the argument that prostitutes like their job treestar Nov 2012 #192
this study is not really about job satisfaction La Lioness Priyanka Nov 2012 #203
It's complicated leftlibdem420 Nov 2012 #194
Well, that's good. It's nice to have TwilightGardener Nov 2012 #202
This has been an interesting thread. Any discussion of porn always starts a flamewar! LongTomH Dec 2012 #207
all this study is really doing is really significantly questioning La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2012 #208
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Porn stars: NO more damag...